Triggered: Stories to make you mad.

Originally posted by Surtur
It would take an elite woman just to compete with an above average man I'm sure you'd agree. And I'm also sure you agree there is a massive difference between an above average male athlete and one at the top of their sport. Hell just being merely above average usually is never enough to really make it professionally. Even the dude finishing dead last in an Olympic race probably is still above being merely an above average athlete. He's just the shittiest out of a handful of elite athletes.

And I think an elite male athlete would probably destroy a female one. Like, Serena Williams or whoever is the #1 woman in tennis now...if we put them up against the current #1 guy in tennis what do you think is gonna happen? WNBA champions play the NBA champions, what happens? Now do soccer. Now do running. Now do weight lifting.

Shit speaking of tennis, while it was before my time perhaps you remember the battle of the sexes? There was two different matches, one guy who was 55 against two different women. The first woman he beat and she had been #1 for 7 years at the time. And he was fifty frickin five. The 2nd woman won. So two elite female athletes in their prime went up against a washed up formerly elite male athlete in his 50's and only won 50% of the time. And that should be the story people tell whenever someone tries to argue about this nonsense.

Regarding your comment about Serena Williams probably losing against a top-tier male athlete, we already know that she in fact wouldn't stand a chance in Hell. She already went up against a male tennis player who wasn't even ranked in the top 100 of male tennis and she got her ass handed to her. I think she may have scored once or twice in all the games they played.

He utterly annihilated her and guess how seriously he took the matchup based on his training before playing it? He didn't practice, like, AT ALL. He even joked that he had a couple of beers before playing her yet he still casually destroyed her. I could only imagine what a male player in the top ten would do to her and she is basically the best that women's tennis has to offer at the moment.

Serena even admitted later on after that match when she was on a talk show that she's glad she doesn't have to compete against men because it's like a totally different game.

Yeah, I don't buy it.

These kids are likely victims of activism, or medicine. Somebody is pushing them to "come out" as young as they possibly can.

Originally posted by cdtm
Not so much amateur wrestling, for some reasons the odds are fairly evened out if you adjust for weight.

Oh please, dude... wrestling is like one of the main sports where women wouldn't stand a chance against men. It's retarded for you to suggest that females can legit compete with males in that particular sport. Don't spin it with that "adjusting for weight," nonsense.

Originally posted by Surtur
It would take an elite woman just to compete with an above average man I'm sure you'd agree. And I'm also sure you agree there is a massive difference between an above average male athlete and one at the top of their sport. Hell just being merely above average usually is never enough to really make it professionally. Even the dude finishing dead last in an Olympic race probably is still above being merely an above average athlete. He's just the shittiest out of a handful of elite athletes.

And I think an elite male athlete would probably destroy a female one. Like, Serena Williams or whoever is the #1 woman in tennis now...if we put them up against the current #1 guy in tennis what do you think is gonna happen? WNBA champions play the NBA champions, what happens? Now do soccer. Now do running. Now do weight lifting.

Shit speaking of tennis, while it was before my time perhaps you remember the battle of the sexes? There was two different matches, one guy who was 55 against two different women. The first woman he beat and she had been #1 for 7 years at the time. And he was fifty frickin five. The 2nd woman won. So two elite female athletes in their prime went up against a washed up formerly elite male athlete in his 50's and only won 50% of the time. And that should be the story people tell whenever someone tries to argue about this nonsense.

Although this is still note enough to defeat the male counterpart.

That said we do correct for weight all the time in mens sports and occasionally a little guy can go up the weight classes, like Evander Holyfield (not a little guy) but not a true heavyweight either.

Way back when many races had women on the battlefield fighting alongside men. Joan of Arc, Boodika etc

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Oh please, dude... wrestling is like one of the main sports where women wouldn't stand a chance against men. It's retarded for you to suggest that females can legit compete with males in that particular sport. Don't spin it with that "adjusting for weight," nonsense.

Seen it with my own eyes.

Not "butch" women either, this was a very, very pretty girl. Like "Cast of Friends" hot.

But the boys she beat were 100 lbs or so.

The boys were 100 lbs? How old were these kids?

Originally posted by Surtur
The boys were 100 lbs? How old were these kids?

High school.

They exist. Not nearly as many of them, so that may have something to do with girls being competitive, what with the smaller talent pool.

Originally posted by cdtm
High school.

They exist. Not nearly as many of them, so that may have something to do with girls being competitive, what with the smaller talent pool.

Originally posted by cdtm
High school.

They exist. Not nearly as many of them, so that may have something to do with girls being competitive, what with the smaller talent pool.

Was the boy who got beat skilled at all? Also I assume you mean like 14 yr. olds?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
would let her win, could they wrassle with boners?

That's just a #MeToo moment waiting to happen.

Originally posted by Surtur
That's just a #MeToo moment waiting to happen.

It's creepy that you kept trying to spar with her.

#NoMeansNo

Originally posted by Surtur
It's creepy that you kept trying to spar with her.

#NoMeansNo

He was 12 and flooded with "make babies" hormones. He gets a pass.

Oh and when it comes to hormone blockers...I don't think as of yet we have had any studies of the long term effects of these things.

So how can anyone give informed consent to take these things?

Chief Justice Roberts Issues Stunning Rebuke Against Schumer for ‘Threatening Statements’ Against Gorsuch, Kavanaugh (UPDATE: Schumer Responds)

Who knew Chuck Schumer could be trashier than Amy Schumer?

Who knew Chuck Schumer could be trashier than Amy Schumer?

Reap the whirlwind.......the not so veiled threats.........who would have known they would actually get even worse then paying Ford to lie........

Originally posted by Surtur
While I don't plan to buy it I do hope the company publishing Woody Allen's memoirs does not cave to people whining about it.

Don't wanna read it don't buy it. Why deny others the chance if they want?

And anyone ready to die on this hill go read what Moses Farrow has said about his mother and the whole situation.

This probably could go here too. Ronan Farrow, Woody's "son", has left his publisher cuz they decided to publish Woody's memoirs. Also whined they didn't tell him and didn't call his sister Dylan to fact check.

But, what? How does one "fact check" in this case?

Publisher: Your dad says he didn't molest you.
Dylan: He did
Publisher: I've literally learned no new information here, thanks!

To be clear I feel his relationship with Soon-Yi was creepy, but I also don't feel he is a pedophile. This is not a Harvey Weinstein or a Roman Polanski.

Oh and speaking of Polanski, Ronan's momma Mia testified on his behalf in 2005. Lol. But yeah throw a fit over a memoir being published. Mia comes off as crazy as f*ck based on what some of her kids have said.

Lol they caved.

Like the part about education and healthcare. You don’t have to either agree or disagree, but it does prove Politicians are really are 2 face and useless individuals to society.
YouTube video

The problem is we have companies paying below minimum as it is.

Under the table/undocumented for example.

Keep things legal and local, companies would have no choice but to take the loss. You can only automate so much, and wages won't really affect their decision to automate where they can.