Darth Malak vs. Ahsoka Tano (Rebels)

Started by Rockydonovang8 pages

Originally posted by thesithmaster
Rebels Maul>Ahsoka. Denying canonical statements is pathetic.

It's too bad there's none that exist that say maul>ahsoka

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
It's too bad there's none that exist that say maul>ahsoka

It's too bad there is and you keep twisting it to suit your purposes. Maul was "potentially" amped. He beat three Inquisitors harder than Ahsoka beat two (not the same team, the team Maul faced also had Eighth Brother) and Ahsoka took 40 seconds to dispatch SS in a 1v1, Maul immediately Force Pushed Eighth Brother away in two moves and stomped SS. Maul's feats are better. And he fought Ahsoka to a standstill despite she using Djem So which gives her an advantage over Juyo.

Maul being the "logical choice" to pair with Ezra makes the most sense considering not only is Maul indisputably one of the two strongest people in that group and Ezra the weakest, but because Maul could also protect Ezra better being intimately familiar with the layout and mechanisms of the temple, and because Maul is the only one who really knew what to do with the holocron that Ezra was carrying.

Originally posted by thesithmaster
He beat three Inquisitors harder than Ahsoka beat two (not the same team, the team Maul faced also had Eighth Brother) and Ahsoka took 40 seconds to dispatch SS in a 1v1, Maul immediately Force Pushed Eighth Brother away in two moves and stomped SS. Maul's feats are better. And he fought Ahsoka to a standstill despite she using Djem So which gives her an advantage over Juyo.

Joker has already countered you on this. Why don't you respond to his counters instead of going on as if he'd never made them?

They're about to fight, though. Maul is the best guy to protect Ezra IN A FIGHT. Which means, that in a fighting sense, Maul>Ahsoka.

I countered that point plenty of times and you didn't respond, so please shut the **** up, lmao.

I love when people lose debates and then still continue to spew the same shit in other threads without countering the unaddressed points. Like, at least have the courtesy to keep your debunked views to yourself if you can't argue them for shit.

Yeah right. Debunked views. Sure. If they're gonna fight, and Maul is best suited to protect the weak link, I think it's pretty obvious that they're saying Maul is the superior fighter of the group.
And Maul>>THREE Inquisitors, Ahsoka>TWO Inquisitors isn't ABC Logic. The teams weren't the exact same. At least learn what ABC Logic is before calling other people's arguments ABC Logic.
You can yell around "I won", but you just denied a canonical statement because of apparent environmental advantage when the episode makes clear Maul has been in that underworld location all the time. Debunk this.
If Maul has a canonical statement putting him as superior to Ahsoka, we cannot deny it. End.

As usual peddling bs. Maul never beat the three inqusiors, Ahsoka outclassed the two inqusitors and was confirmed to ""never be in danger" facing them.

If said canonical statement said anything other than Maul was the best to protect Ezra, you might have a point, but it didn't, so it's pointless to bring up here

Originally posted by thesithmaster
Yeah right. Debunked views. Sure. If they're gonna fight, and Maul is best suited to protect the weak link, I think it's pretty obvious that they're saying Maul is the superior fighter of the group.
And Maul>>THREE Inquisitors, Ahsoka>TWO Inquisitors isn't ABC Logic. The teams weren't the exact same. At least learn what ABC Logic is before calling other people's arguments ABC Logic.
You can yell around "I won", but you just denied a canonical statement because of apparent environmental advantage when the episode makes clear Maul has been in that underworld location all the time. Debunk this.
If Maul has a canonical statement putting him as superior to Ahsoka, we cannot deny it. End.
You're hopeless, lol. I've addressed all of this nonsensical trash before and you ignored it, so I'm not wasting my time with you anymore.

Now you know what it's like trying to defend ahsoka on cv joker

"Nonsensical trash" hasn't been addressed. You believe you have, but that doesn't make it a reality. But given people will just say my arguments are trash because I don't bow to Lady Tano, then I'm just letting it be. Bye-bye.
And Maul wasn't beating the Inquisitors? Yeah. He just kicked SS in the face, knocking her out for some time, landed two hits on FB which left him vulnerable weren't it for Maul being forced to dodge a strike from another Inquisitor, then Maul just did with EB the same he did with SS. Not beating them at all. No.

You're dense, lmfao.

Quote and respond to joker's arguments(and I mean all of what he said, not cropped quotes) or drop the bluster.

Rather than addressing anything he's said you've simply repeated what you've already said and what Joker already responded to

I'm not going to counter because it's likely I won't even get a response. I'm not going to waste my time on this.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Quote and respond to joker's arguments(and I mean all of what he said, not cropped quotes) or drop the bluster.

Rather than addressing anything he's said you've simply repeated what you've already said and what Joker already responded to

And completely misconstruing what I was saying.

Originally posted by thesithmaster
I'm not going to counter because it's likely I won't even get a response. I'm not going to waste my time on this.
LMFAO WHAT, why wouldn't you get a response?

Thesithmaster, what's your zodiac sign?

Not seeing why Joker should respond when you've failed to do so

👆

Originally posted by |King Joker|
And completely misconstruing what I was saying.

LMFAO WHAT, why wouldn't you get a response?

Umm... because you said you didn't want to waste time on this? In this page?

And my Zodiac sign is Cancer.