Violence at Neo Nazi protest.

Started by Robtard58 pages
Originally posted by Bashar Teg

Aww, Trump won back the hearts of the KKK and it took less than 24 hours. Didn't think they were such a fickle bunch, tbh.

Originally posted by Robtard
Aww, Trump won back the hearts of the KKK and it took less than 24 hours. Didn't think they were a fickle bunch, tbh.

confirmed: the president is a terrorist sympathizer.

Can't be too hard on the KKK and Nazis.

i'm still not convinced trump has a chance of winning the 1938 election.

:edit: i mean *2017. whoops.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i'm still not convinced trump has a chance of winning the 1938 election.

:edit: i mean *2017. whoops.


The 2017 presidential election... right...

I don't think anyone has a chance of winning the 2017 presidential election tbh

Well, maybe Pence.

Originally posted by BackFire
Can't be too hard on the KKK and Nazis.

Jews will not replace them; it's their street

Originally posted by Emperordmb
The 2017 presidential election... right...

I don't think anyone has a chance of winning the 2017 presidential election tbh

i suppose i deserve a citation for careless posting. thanks officer.

Originally posted by jaden101
https://video.vice.com/en_us/video/charlottesville-race-and-terror-vice-news-tonight-on-hbo/59921b1d2f8d32d808bddfbc

Interesting watch.

Man that Christopher Cantwell is a problem.........."The fact that none of our people killed anyone unjustly........"

That is some scary shit, lets dump antifa and the white nationals on an island far far away and charge pay per view............

Scary state of affairs with our radical groups.

Originally posted by Robtard
Jews will not replace them; it's their street

TBF, SJWs have refered to multiple jews as being white supremisists and Nazis publically so within that specific sense, I suppose they have a case for saying that Jews will not replace them lol

Originally posted by darthgoober
TBF, SJWs have refered to multiple jews as being white supremisists and Nazis publically so within that specific sense, I suppose they have a case for saying that Jews will not replace them lol

Wut?

But it honestly looks like you're trying to mitigate how awful a large group of White Supremacist gathering together to chant hatred actually is with some whatever "SJW" whataboutary.

Originally posted by Robtard
Wut?

But it honestly looks like you're trying to mitigate how awful a large group of White Supremacist gathering together to chant hatred actually is with some whatever "SJW" whataboutary.


No it was a joke. I said in that specific sense because in any other sense it's outright stupid to chant.

chanting is the only way blind people will know who's protesting. you got something against blind people?

Originally posted by Emperordmb
bullshit

A large part of the reason he won was a combination of reactionary forces against the establishment, and the fact that he was running against Hillary Clinton of all people.

The mediia spending every moment of every day on him instead of lionizing alternatives probably didn't help.

Lets be honest, the bars so low now many people are used to idolizing pieces of garbage. How many celebrities build up career despite being womanizing, drug addicted, vulgar narcissists?

Trumps exactly the kind of "winned" Hollywood's been pushing for decades now.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
chanting is the only way blind people will know who's protesting. you got something against blind people?

Probably why they throw the Nazi salute too, otherwise how would the deaf people know just how many of them support the idea rather than just happen to be walking next to someone with a flag? Well if nothing else, I suppose it could be said that they go out of their way to clue in the handicapped 😆

Originally posted by Robtard
?
it was terrorism. who was saying it wasn't?

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Actually that is a Lie. There was a Large Group that were against Slavery. They were called Abolitionists. You need to stop reading Leftist Revised History...aka Lies. [/B]
it's not about whether or not there were people in the south that disagreed with slavery... that wasn't my point. the people in power in the south who lead the revolt were very much concerned that lincoln was going to abolish slavery, which was a big part of why they decided to secede in the first place. there was also disagreement over the status of slavery in newly attained territories in the west. i dunno why people still can't come to grips with the fact that the southern leadership cared about slavery. it was an immensely profitable enterprise at the time.

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
it's not about whether or not there were people in the south that disagreed with slavery... that wasn't my point. the people in power in the south who lead the revolt were very much concerned that lincoln was going to abolish slavery, which was a big part of why they decided to secede in the first place. there was also disagreement over the status of slavery in newly attained territories in the west. i dunno why people still can't come to grips with the fact that the southern leadership cared about slavery. it was an immensely profitable enterprise at the time.
and now the alt-righters turn on each other.

i'm an 'alt-righter?'

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
i'm an 'alt-righter?'

Probably.