Originally posted by Robtard
Which is great and in the scheme of things I agree, shout it out, just don't get violent. But again, why is it always the "Antifa" are the violent attackers when this country literally has a history of violence from White Supremacist?
It's already well known that white supremacists can be very violent. lol He says they aren't?
Originally posted by dadudemon
Right, no pun intended. This is the crux of the problem. If you voted for Trump, and you say you did, and any of those shitheads are around, prepare to receive a gang-style beat down.Libtard logic: "Trump is sexist and racist and abusive towards women. Therefore, anyone who voted for trump is sexist and racist and abusive towards women. I know! Let's be abusive to people who voted for Trump! Perfect reaction! It makes absolute sense!"
Lol. You should visit the Flag/statue thread. If you like those things, you're a racist
Originally posted by Robtard
Which is great and in the scheme of things I agree, shout it out, just don't get violent. But again, why is it always the "Antifa" are the violent attackers when this country literally has a history of violence from White Supremacist?
Originally posted by Robtard
They're still a Nazi. Duh.Fun fact: The largest group to receive social benefits (food stamps, medicaid, welfare etc) are White people who identify as Conservative :0
It makes sense that the largest racial demographic would also have the most poor people, but what study shows that conservatives receive more social benefits than liberals?
Originally posted by darthgoober
Antifa ISN'T always the violent attackers. But in recent times they are the ones showing up at major concervitive events with the intent to get the event shut down. Nazis don't actually assemble en masse all that often. The left seems to have protested events of the right far more often than vice versa in recent times and Antifa always seems to show up at a large portion of these protest with the express intent of using far more than words to support their cause.
No, correct on the Nazis/KKK/Alt-Right assembling, not until recently a least. Wonder what happened.
That doesn't do away with the historic violent nature of White Supremacist though. You don't get to spread an imagine of hatred and violence and then go "just look the other way, okay." Don't care how you try rebranding yourselves with a "White Nationalism" moniker.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Isn't it interesting how some people are doing everything they can to excuse/down-play the violence one side commits, all the while screaming about the other side's admittedly worse violence.
Bingo.
Originally posted by Robtard
You outright blamed her death on both sides for one, sport. "Antifa" didn't get in a car, seek out a peaceful group away from the shitshow and then plow into said group. One person/side did. This is a fact; you can't stand it.
Both sides were responsible for the violence. The violence.
There were violent clashes on both sides. It is not wrong to say both sides are culpable in the violence.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
and one side was responsible for the terrorism and murder. so you and your bros just keep trying to wave your hand and causally dismiss that. try very very hard.
What is your definition of terrorism? Since it doesn't just involve murder. I'd argue both sides did shit that could be defined as that. One side committed murder.
This does not magically erase the violence and destruction.
New Jersey has labeled them terrorists, but you just shrug it off and say it's to appease the alt right.
Originally posted by Surtur
Both sides were responsible for the violence. The violence.There were violent clashes on both sides. It is not wrong to say both sides are culpable in the violence.
So we're also now pretending that you didn't initially blame her death on both sides? Seems I missed a few memos. My bad.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
and one side was responsible for the terrorism and murder. so you and your bros just keep trying to wave your hand and causally dismiss that. try very very hard.
One side was responsible for a murder this is true.
Both were responsible for violence and terrorism
Terrorism: the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims. This sounds like both groups yes?
Originally posted by Robtard
No, correct on the Nazis/KKK/Alt-Right assembling, not until recently a least. Wonder what happened.That doesn't do away with the historic violent nature of White Supremacist though. You don't get to spread an imagine of hatred and violence and then go "just look the other way, okay." Don't care how you try rebranding yourselves with a "White Nationalism" moniker.
Very true but people have been wary of white supremacists for a long time, most of the country already rightly hates them and tries to keep a close eye on their actions. Antifa is something fairly new and currently more active than white supremacists which is why people are so quick to bring them up and point them out. White supremacist are already under intense scrutiny by pretty much the whole country. What people are actually wanting in regards to Antifa is more scrutiny because nowadays they the bigger problem in regards to frequency of violent occurrence even though they haven't yet matched the white supremacist in regards to the magnitude of individual violence. People who are concerned with Antifa don't want to wait for them to show willingness to kill in the streets because they assemble more often in greater numbers, work hard to conceal their identities(which means they'll be harder to bring to justice), and their professed cause is popular even though their words and actions fail to match up.
Originally posted by Robtard
So we're also now pretending that you didn't initially blame her death on both sides? Seems I missed a few memos. My bad.
I said both sides were culpable for the violence. The car thing was not the only violence.
Again: these people, in Boston, admitted they were communists and not patriots. They are so anti nazi they burn the flag of the country that helped beat the nazis.
Originally posted by NewGuy01
It makes sense that the largest racial demographic would also have the most poor people, but what study shows that conservatives receive more social benefits than liberals?
Pew Research group my terrorist loving friend:
So have nearly equal shares of self-identifying conservatives (57%), liberals (53%) and moderates (53%). The programs were Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, welfare, unemployment benefits and food stamps.
Originally posted by Robtard
You'd have to research each statue individually, I would imagine.Unless TheBlaze has already told you it was 'dem Liberals'?
Nope, blaze hasn't told me anything. Just wondering which party, overall, pushed for these kind of statues.
Like the Jefferson Memorial, who wanted it?
HYG:
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
VIDEO: Why Do These Confederate Monuments Fall Apart So Easily?
Unless that guy is just a another "lying liberal cuck", seems these statues mainly went up duing two periods of American history. Jim Crow and the Civil Rights movement. Clearly it was Liberals.
Here's a handy screen-cap for you, my Liberal Derangement Syndrome suffering friend: https://ibb.co/hfe5U5