darthgoober
Senior Member
Originally posted by "Id"
Thor fans still post here. You just don't see them jump into topics anymore.Besides the Carvman are there any active Hulk fans that still post here?
Surfer fans are gone...Ambient, Darth, Naija etc...
Without anyone to compete, Superfans rolling up on fools.
Originally posted by carver9
It's crazy because the (sorry Bada) mods look at me as the problem when the problem is soooooo much bigger than me. A single person can not do as much damage to a website as what has happened here. No matter how much I can't stand H1, I have never thought in my head that I am leaving KMC because of him. The problem is bigger than me. Especially when you have grade A debaters leaving and lurking around without even posting (Rage, Scoobles, Goober, celey has started to back away from posting as much, and the list goes on) because of these same issues.
Hey I'm still around, I just don't bother anymore for the most part lol
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
And that's why I see the 'Superfans' seeming to run others off.Five, three years ago, a Hulk/Superman thread would be competitive. At the same time, new scans could be relied on on a weekly basis.
Now? Superfans can use showings from OWAW, Final Crisis, PLUS NU52 etc. Hulk fans have to rely on old scans (if they want to be competitive) at which point it's nothing new, or they're forced to use Cho, who is nowhere near Banner levels.
Whilst every week, Superman garners more feats.
So it looks like Superfans are stifling the forum, when it's actually just the reliability of new evidence and proofs (which keeps things fresh) that is also to blame.
Here's the thing though, there's nothing wrong with their old feats. Feats don't have to be new to be valid and newer feats aren't actually MORE valid than older feats. The "current versions of characters" stipulation in the rules has been corrupted to mean as such by many, but that's not actually what that stipulation is talking about. What that stipulation has always meant, is that if "Thor" is listed as the thread participant then right now it means Jane Thor by default. It doesn't mean that in a thread featuring Odinson w/hammer is about "Odinson as he was portrayed for a year and a half before losing the hammer".
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Yeah he has, but new 52 Superman suddenly gaining all the feats of pre 52 is.....a good boost, won't you say? And vice versa.OWAW Superman, who without the sundip can bench the Earth for five days etc etc.
Originally posted by -Pr-
Some low showings don't invalidate their power, or what Superman was able to do.Especially with how DC, as DS said, just combined two versions of Superman, giving him the feats of both. It's a ridiculous boost.
A "boost"? Nope, not in the slightest. It certainly gives him a more expansive library of feats, but not a higher quality of them. Do you really think that his Earth weight feat is more impressive than lifting the supposedly infinite weight of that book?
I'm tempted to actually explain in depth on what the problems plaguing KMC are(again lol), but honestly I don't think anyone cares anymore. It has less to do with Superfans directly though than it does a number of double standards that have become the accepted norm on the forum that stifle good debates right from the outset.