POLL - Darth Maul: TPM vs Rebels

I don't need "absolute evidence" when The opposing stance is supported by "no evidence"

Also, I don't think there's anyone save for maybe AZ who takes singular evidence as irrefutable, however singular evidence will always make for a stronger case than evidence that is solely based on a fan interpretation of a scene.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
I don't need "absolute evidence" when The opposing stance is supported by "no evidence"

Originally posted by DarthAnt66

Is that really all you took from my post?

Unfortunately, you ended up mischaracterizing my argument rather than actually responding to it. No evidence is absolute, however we don't ignore evidence just because it's not irrefutable. You actually have to refute evidence or provide more/stronger contradictory evidence for us to dismiss aforementioned evidence.

(Except yours isn't even evidence)

(Evidence doesn't suddenly stop being evidence because you don't like it. Is there a reason we're talking in parenthesis?)

No, because it's actually not. As I explained, the quote has no authority.

Make up your mind Ant, is this debate going to be contained in parenthesis or not?

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
I don't need "absolute evidence" when The opposing stance is supported by "no evidence"

Palpatine’s expressions of struggle would be evidence.

The fact that there was a fight with no signs of toyzing would be evidence.

Toying would be Yoda taking Ventress’s Sabers, then voluntarily handing them back to her.

Toying would be Vader having a Saber to Luke’s throat but not killing him.

Heck Toying would even be Palpatine not even igniting his Sabers for a while while facing Savage.

"expressions of struggle"

Aight, I'm convinced.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
He's referring to this gem:

I'm genuinely curious what AZ would make of it given he has Kenobi as capable of legitimately three-shotting Maul post-prime.

That list puts Sidious under Vader.

Originally posted by TheNuisanceBird
That list puts Sidious under Vader.

Only in Saber “Skills”

How is it considered these days here?

TCW > TPM > OM? or...?

I think that's the main consensus, however Kbro and couple of others think his Rebels version is his peak. I still reckon canon Maul is underpowered, especially when looking at his feats as a child/youth in the EU, they're quite impressive.

Pre-TPM Maul > TCW Maul >> Rebels Maul 🙂

Rebels Maul ain’t that bad at his best- Stalemating Rebels Ahsoka.

Unfortunately his low feats are just too pathetic.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Just used Safari on desktop and it works there.

Anyone else use Chrome desktop?

Lmfao, this is weird.

I use Chrome.

I got it:

"Upon arrival, Sidious declared the Sith brothers to be his rivals. In an intense duel, he killed Savage and toyed with Maul, ultimately deciding not to kill his former apprentice."

^ Yeah it's in the galleries section of the Maul, Savage, and Sidious duel.

Yeah. Regardless, as I said, it's not binding.