Originally posted by John Murdoch
Good points, Wallman. My post was in response to Mr. Alexander's below:I was simply pointing out some feats in IM3 and Civil War that shows the Marks from those movies aren't quite up to par when compared to the Marks from IM1, IM2, Avengers, and AoU (AoU did come after IM3, I realize). Thus, one cannot assume that the armor from Civil War is superior to the previous Marks since it is used later in the MCU chronology.
My big points are
- Tony got hit by an AA shell in IM1
- Tony fought pretty evenly with Thor, flew fast and powerfully enough to restart and then momentarily keep up with the SHIELD helicarrier's turbine until he got slammed around by it in AvengersIMO, these feats show these Marks that Tony used prior to IM3 and CW as superior in toughness, durability, and power when compared to the Marks in IM3 and CW, which upsets the notion that his armors always progress and get better in every area.
However, I do concede to your points made that Tony wasn't a pushover in CW. I completely forgot about the steel support pillar feat in Siberia at the movie's end.
Originally posted by John Murdoch
I guess I should actually post about the battle at hand: really don't know. I'll be the politician and say that it goes similarly to the Luke vs Danny showdown in Defenders, with Tony getting knocked into the ground, gaining a headache and a newfound respect for Danny in the inevitable Avengers/Defenders crossover in 2022.
Ive made a very Important discovery. Check my next point.