Wolverine vs. MCU Lady Sif

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
1. If it pierces Adamantium it pierces everything. I guesd it is pretty logical.

That's a no limits fallacy

2. A very small tree!!? Haha you couldnt even lift up 1/4 of that tree my friend.

Yes, a very small tree.

Sif doesnt really have an advantage.

Except for stats, skill and range

3.Proof it? Lol its logical that the moment she gets close Wolverine is in range to ise his claws.

Only she has better range than Wolverine does, IOW she can attack him from outside his range.

4. Nor do you my dear friend.

You're the one claiming that a ko doesn't count as a win.

What doesn magic have to do here? Lol.

LOL!!!

Originally posted by FrothByte
Ok hold up. Before we go any further, what do you mean Wolverine is as strong as Loki? You must be the only person in this entire forum that thinks this.

Asgardians are strong enough to easily bend steel bars, kick around trailers, crumple tactical knives in their hands and are tough enough to be bullet proof. Wolverine is nowhere near that strong or durable.

Give your 14 yr old a katana then ask him to cut down an oak tree. See how well that goes.

P.S. - cut it out with the adamantium bullet nonsense already. The bullet that knocked out Wolverine was a regular bullet fired by a cop.

What makes you think he isnt? Well it just makes me the only one who really knows what he is talking about.

You forget my friend that Loki isnt an Asgardian.

He doesnt need to be. His Regeneration is 1000x better than any Asgardian. He has Adamantium bones which makes him undestructible.

Durabilitywise Sif gets MEGA STOMP by Wolverine.

Wolverine is easily one of the Most durable heroes in Marvel! Not even Thor would be as durable.

Except Wolverine isnt a 14 year old and has Adamantium Claws instead of a Katana! Plus Sif's skin isnt as hard as wood!! Sif gets butchered.

P.S. Sif doesnt have a pistol. Point disproven.

Again OP never stated K.O. means defeat. Wolverine stood up fast when the wound healed.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
What makes you think he isnt? Well it just makes me the only one who really knows what he is talking about.

You forget my friend that Loki isnt an Asgardian.

He doesnt need to be. His Regeneration is 1000x better than any Asgardian. He has Adamantium bones which makes him undestructible.

Durabilitywise Sif gets MEGA STOMP by Wolverine.

Wolverine is easily one of the Most durable heroes in Marvel! Not even Thor would be as durable.

Except Wolverine isnt a 14 year old and has Adamantium Claws instead of a Katana! Plus Sif's skin isnt as hard as wood!! Sif gets butchered.

P.S. Sif doesnt have a pistol. Point disproven.

Again OP never stated K.O. means defeat. Wolverine stood up fast when the wound healed.

Ok first of all, this is the movie versus forum. So comic feats don't mean jack here. 2nd, Loki is strong enough to match hits with Thor and was able to even manhandle Thor a few times. There was certainly nothing to show that Loki is weaker than the average Asgardian. If you want to claim that Wolverine is that strong then you need to provide proof, movie feats. Not just your opinion.

Unless you can actually get around this whole "Wolverine is as strong as Loki" nonsense then no one here will take your opinions seriously, which means the rest of your arguments automatically become useless.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Ok first of all, this is the movie versus forum. So comic feats don't mean jack here. 2nd, Loki is strong enough to match hits with Thor and was able to even manhandle Thor a few times. There was certainly nothing to show that Loki is weaker than the average Asgardian. If you want to claim that Wolverine is that strong then you need to provide proof, movie feats. Not just your opinion.

Unless you can actually get around this whole "Wolverine is as strong as Loki" nonsense then no one here will take your opinions seriously, which means the rest of your arguments automatically become useless.

All he ever does is bring up comics and pretend his opinions are facts, he's basically h1 jr.

Originally posted by Silent Master
That's a no limits fallacy

Yes, a very small tree.

Except for stats, skill and range

Only she has better range than Wolverine does, IOW she can attack him from outside his range.

You're the one claiming that a ko doesn't count as a win.

LOL!!!

You are a no limit fallacy.

If the bullet pierces Adamantium then everything else means nothing!

You are comical

Which against mean nothing. The Wolverine has taken against better.

Except Sif's attack mean nothing. Logan closes the range and kills here. Its logic.

You are the one claiming it does when the OP never said this was a slugfest or a H2H.

LOLLLLL!

No limit fallacies aren't valid evidence, nor are the comics or your opinions.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Ok first of all, this is the movie versus forum. So comic feats don't mean jack here. 2nd, Loki is strong enough to match hits with Thor and was able to even manhandle Thor a few times. There was certainly nothing to show that Loki is weaker than the average Asgardian. If you want to claim that Wolverine is that strong then you need to provide proof, movie feats. Not just your opinion.

Unless you can actually get around this whole "Wolverine is as strong as Loki" nonsense then no one here will take your opinions seriously, which means the rest of your arguments automatically become useless.

Lol.

When did Lucky manhandled Thor.

The only one whose opinion isnt to be taken seriously is yours. The very fact that you think Sif has a chance here is irrational.

Originally posted by Silent Master
All he ever does is bring up comics and pretend his opinions are facts, he's basically h1 jr.

All you ever do is talk stupidity. You dont even prove your points. I wonder if you even have watched the movies.

I have given evidence. HBU?

Originally posted by Silent Master
No limit fallacies aren't valid evidence, nor are the comics or your opinions.

There is a difference between a fallacy and a fact.

Ive given you facts.

Logan guts her.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Lol.

When did Lucky manhandled Thor.

The only one whose opinion isnt to be taken seriously is yours. The very fact that you think Sif has a chance here is irrational.

All you ever do is talk stupidity. You dont even prove your points. I wonder if you even have watched the movies.

I have given evidence. HBU?

There is a difference between a fallacy and a fact.

Ive given you facts.

In the battle at the top of Avengers tower, Loki grabs Thor by the nape and smashes his head down. He wouldn't be able to do that if he wasn't anywhere near Thor's strength.

Bottom line is, I actually provide proof of what I say. I'm still waiting for you to provide proof of Wolverine being as strong as Loki or Sif.

Originally posted by FrothByte
In the battle at the top of Avengers tower, Loki grabs Thor by the nape and smashes his head down. He wouldn't be able to do that if he wasn't anywhere near Thor's strength.

Bottom line is, I actually provide proof of what I say. I'm still waiting for you to provide proof of Wolverine being as strong as Loki or Sif.

That doesnt prove Lucky being stronger!

Logan could do the same thing!.

If Lucky thinks he is stronger than Logan then this is what Logan would say, "Go **** yourself pretty boy!"

https://youtu.be/Re4HPKgyAyc

It took more than 20 ninjas + a poisoned arrow to stop the Wolverine.

I REPEAT! SIF HAS 0 CHANCE.

I have given you evidence.

Luvky wouldnt even hold half the man Wolverine did in that scene!

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
That doesnt prove Lucky being stronger!

Logan could do the same thing!.

If Lucky thinks he is stronger than Logan then this is what Logan would say, "Go **** yourself pretty boy!"

https://youtu.be/Re4HPKgyAyc

It took more than 20 ninjas + a poisoned arrow to stop the Wolverine.

I REPEAT! SIF HAS 0 CHANCE.

I have given you evidence.

Luvky wouldnt even hold half the man Wolverine did in that scene!

That's not evidence. That's called stating your opinion. Evidence would be you providing a clip of Wolverine manhandling someone of similar strength to Thor in the same way Loki did.

Go ahead, find a clip where he does something like that. I'll wait.

Or if you want, another proof of Loki's strength is not even being knocked back by a full kick from Captain America. So if you can show me a clip of Wolverine tanking a hit from someone with superstrength like Cap's then that's proper proof.

Originally posted by FrothByte
In the battle at the top of Avengers tower, Loki grabs Thor by the nape and smashes his head down. He wouldn't be able to do that if he wasn't anywhere near Thor's strength.

Bottom line is, I actually provide proof of what I say. I'm still waiting for you to provide proof of Wolverine being as strong as Loki or Sif.

Much like H1, he believes his opinion equals fact.

Originally posted by FrothByte
That's not evidence. That's called stating your opinion. Evidence would be you providing a clip of Wolverine manhandling someone of similar strength to Thor in the same way Loki did.

Go ahead, find a clip where he does something like that. I'll wait.

Or if you want, another proof of Loki's strength is not even being knocked back by a full kick from Captain America. So if you can show me a clip of Wolverine tanking a hit from someone with superstrength like Cap's then that's proper proof.

Lol!

Show me that Lucky can move 20+ ninjas!!

Your own retoric goes against you.

Logan took it against the Juggernaut who is stronger than Cap.

Your points are dead

Originally posted by Silent Master
Much like H1, he believes his opinion equals fact.

Youve already failed these debate.

Sif dies.

She doesnt represent a threat to Logan

Ive proven my points.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Logan stomps.

Sif doesnt have a real advantage anywhere!

Her speed is the only thing that could help her. But Adamantium Wolverine at his prime took head to head with the Juggernaut!

Even Thor himself would have trouble against Wolverine.

Sif has NO CHANCE here.

where is proof logan can cut her.. so far you haven't proven anything...

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Lol!

Show me that Lucky can move 20+ ninjas!!

Your own retoric goes against you.

Logan took it against the Juggernaut who is stronger than Cap.

Your points are dead

Youve already failed these debate.

Sif dies.

She doesnt represent a threat to Logan

Ive proven my points.

I don't know if you're specifically trying to be obtuse or if you're just really not that great at logic.

If Logan can survive a full hit from Juggernaut without getting knocked back, that would be valid proof of your argument. But simply saying "Logan took it against the Juggernaut" is worth nothing since it is not relevant.

Logan didn't "move" 20+ ninjas, since they weren't bracing and trying to stop him from moving. They were simply moving along with him.

Again, show me proof of Wolverine manhandling around someone as strong as Thor. Show me proof of Wolverine tanking hits from someone as strong as Cap without getting knocked back.

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
where is proof logan can cut her.. so far you haven't proven anything...

He doesn't deal in proof, all he has Are No Limit fallacies and his opinion

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
where is proof logan can cut her.. so far you haven't proven anything...

Lol.

Does she have unpenetrable skin!? Where is that said?

So far you are proving ignorance.

Originally posted by FrothByte
I don't know if you're specifically trying to be obtuse or if you're just really not that great at logic.

If Logan can survive a full hit from Juggernaut without getting knocked back, that would be valid proof of your argument. But simply saying "Logan took it against the Juggernaut" is worth nothing since it is not relevant.

Logan didn't "move" 20+ ninjas, since they weren't bracing and trying to stop him from moving. They were simply moving along with him.

Again, show me proof of Wolverine manhandling around someone as strong as Thor. Show me proof of Wolverine tanking hits from someone as strong as Cap without getting knocked back.

Lol am not the one saying that Sif wins!!

Lol. Juggernaut》》》》》》》》》Sif! Well that was my argument. I thought it was pretty OBVIOUS!

BAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! LOL LOL AND ITS ME THE UNLOGICA!!!

They were trying to stop him!!! It was until their leader used the poisoned arrow that Wolverine felt! Playing the ignorant WONT help your case!

You are clearly playing ignorant! Thor couldnt handle 20+ ninjas the way Wolverine did! Much less would Lucky!

The Juggernaut easily outpowers Cap!

Your points have sunk FrothByte.

Originally posted by Silent Master
He doesn't deal in proof, all he has Are No Limit fallacies and his opinion

All you have is evasion and use of personal comments to harm other's opinions.

Want to be a good debater? Use facts 😉

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Lol am not the one saying that Sif wins!!

Lol. Juggernaut》》》》》》》》》Sif! Well that was my argument. I thought it was pretty OBVIOUS!

BAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! LOL LOL AND ITS ME THE UNLOGICA!!!

They were trying to stop him!!! It was until their leader used the poisoned arrow that Wolverine felt! Playing the ignorant WONT help your case!

You are clearly playing ignorant! Thor couldnt handle 20+ ninjas the way Wolverine did! Much less would Lucky!

The Juggernaut easily outpowers Cap!

Your points have sunk FrothByte.

Wait, hold on. Did you just say that Thor wouldn't have been able to handle those 20+ ninjas??

My friend, your credibility just went out the window.