Re: Re: Re: Mueller Now Investigating Democratic Lobbyist Tony Podesta
Originally posted by dadudemon
Let me get this right. He raged and ranted about Mueller's bias against the GOP and Trump but when Mueller starts investigating a Dem, all of a sudden, Surtur is a fool for being interested in it? He seems rather level headed and not so gloaty in the OP. I think your reaction is overblown. Are you pissed that Mueller is coming after someone in your party? Is that why you're reacting like this?
Off course, when he actually pressed any left leaning forumer, we all unanimously said we're fine with Mueller investigating Podesta which leaves Surtur with nothing to "expose" in order to try and attack our credibility.
So instead Surtur tries to attack Bashar's credibility by complaining about how bashar's first post was a defelction even though it was a direct response to a point Surtur made in the op. In other words, literally the opposite of a deflection.
Originally posted by Surtur
Ban him for a month? Bada might as well take the razor blade to Bash's wrists himself then.
We should just be grateful that Bashy don't post as much as he used to. Dont' want to confuse him with people Like You Surt!!!!!! People might start thinking that if his daily post count gets to high he is an unemployed basement dweller that is a drug addicted loser.
Nope. WE SURE DON'T WANT THAT!!!!!!
😎
Re: Re: Re: Re: Mueller Now Investigating Democratic Lobbyist Tony Podesta
Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Surt doesn't take Mueller investigating Trump seriously, but takes an interest in him investigating a democrat...
The second part of your sentence should be, "Because the democrats were getting very hot and bothered when Mueller was pursuing GOP people."
Of course PVS would say that he trusts Mueller and his integrity: he'd have no foundation and Surtur could say "gotcha." PVS is the type that would allow his house to burn down just to get one up on Surtur or someone like Surtur, on the internet.
Let me put it a different way: PVS would still state that if the entire democratic party was taken down but Mueller. He absolutely will never stand for losing his "internet integrity."
His response was just to be combative. It was tripe. It wasn't until Surtur called him out on it that PVS realized he was about to lose his internet cred and went all in on Mueller's dick. It's a constant e-peen battle between Surt and Team-PVS/Robtard.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Mueller Now Investigating Democratic Lobbyist Tony Podesta
Originally posted by Rockydonovang
You seem to have missed Bashar's point. Surt doesn't take Mueller investigating Trump seriously, but takes an interest in him investigating a democrat and then tries to use it to expose our double standards.Off course, when he actually pressed any left leaning forumer, we all unanimously said we're fine with Mueller investigating Podesta which leaves Surtur with nothing to "expose" in order to try and attack our credibility.
So instead Surtur tries to attack Bashar's credibility by complaining about how bashar's first post was a defelction even though it was a direct response to a point Surtur made in the op. In other words, literally the opposite of a deflection.
Keep cucking for him, you're doing a good job.
We can continue to ignore the main point of the thread wasn't that, but the Podesta thing. A throwaway comment was seized upon in order to b*tch and moan. Did you want to continue? Type a few more paragraphs about it.
Originally posted by Surtur
You deflected, whined about other shit. Too funny. What a dipstick.For me this is awesome either way. Either we denounce Mueller and all he has done, or we acknowledge the importance of shit he looks into, all the shit.
Pretty sure Bashar agreed with the latter option in this post proceeding yours
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
... i support mueller's investigation and trust his integrity...
So yeah, as Bash stated and I agree, Mueller's investigation into Podesta is valid, as well as his investigation into Trump.
It's only in your warped biased conspiracy theory mindset that Democrats are hypocritically denouncing Mueller's Podesta investigation, which is the reason you made this thread, as Bash pointed out. Of course, him pointing it out is the reason you got mad and childishly called him a dipstick out of insecure immaturity (just like Trump...).
I must say, you have learned the art of conspiracy theories, juvenile retorts, and biased thinking very well from Time "Jade Helm" Immemorial.