Mueller Now Investigating Democratic Lobbyist Tony Podesta

Good Stuff

YouTube video

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Good Stuff

YouTube video [/B]

Oh I am sure it was money "Stolen" from their Charity Foundation.

Originally posted by Firefly218
Wow, apparently the Clinton campaign paid for opposition research instead of taking the traditional course of having Russia do it.

So if I got this correctly, it seems the Steele Dossier was first funded by Republicans opposing Trump, then Clinton/Dems took it over after Trump won the nomination, yeah?

Two things:

1) Is this illegal, paying for detective-style work of an opponent?

2) Does paying for it automatically mean that what's in the dossier is fake?

Originally posted by Robtard
So if I got this correctly, it seems the Steele Dossier was first funded by Republicans opposing Trump, then Clinton/Dems took it over after Trump won the nomination, yeah?

Two things:

1) Is this illegal, paying for detective-style work of an opponent?

2) Does paying for it automatically mean that what's in the dossier is fake?

[list=1][*]No.
[*]No.[/list]

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
[list=1][*]No.
[*]No.[/list]

"intention" it's called

Originally posted by Firefly218
Wow, apparently the Clinton campaign paid for opposition research instead of taking the traditional course of having Russia do it.

But they swore up and down they had nothing to do with the dossier. Weird. Then when someone from the NYT dares point it out some leftists freak out over it. Yet it's always said it's the Trumpers who can't handle when people talk bad about Trump.

Now, I realize you feel Trump lies and you can't trust him. But there is no valid reason to put any trust in the other side either at this point lol.

Just reinforces my "both sides are shit" idea.

Originally posted by Surtur
But they swore up and down they had nothing to do with the dossier. Weird. Then when someone from the NYT dares point it out some leftists freak out over it. Yet it's always said it's the Trumpers who can't handle when people talk bad about Trump.

Now, I realize you feel Trump lies and you can't trust him. But there is no valid reason to put any trust in the other side either at this point lol.

Just reinforces my "both sides are shit" idea.

^

LoL @ distancing himself now

Originally posted by Robtard
^

LoL @ distancing himself now

Lol @ acting like this is the first time I've said it. Nothing else to say after this hilarious exposure of these lying little shits?

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol @ acting like this is the first time I've said it.

Nothing else to say after this hilarious exposure of these lying little shits?

Pointing out your silly tactics is humorous to me.

Oh yeah, impeach them both 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
Pointing out your silly tactics is humorous to me.

Oh yeah, impeach them both 🙂

I can relate, it's how I feel when I point out yours.

So to get this straight:

-What team Clinton did is shit

-What Junior/Kushner/Manafort (on Trump's orders if we're being honest and not massive phaggots) did is okay

Do I have this correct? If not, explain in detail

That's up to you, either gathering opposition research is okay or it's not.

So here is what happens Rob: either what both did are okay are both are shit.

You need to choose. Prove you can see both sides for what they are. Or prove you aren't to be taken seriously.

Originally posted by Robtard
-That "foreign agent" wasn't connected to a foreign government, he is a private citizen

-Junior met on the grounds that the Russian lawyer had "dirt" on daddy's political rival and that the Russian lawyer was explicitly connected with the Russian government and working on their behalf; the email exchange clearly spells this out

Come on, you really have to try better than this, too easy to counter

Name the law Jr. broke. Or would have broken. I'm dead serious, just name it.

Originally posted by Surtur
Name the law Jr. broke. Or would have broken. I'm dead serious, just name it.

IOW: "Solve the case for Mueller right now or it's a nothing burger!"

You've tried this silly tactic before, I'm no eLawyer; I leave that to you.

Originally posted by Robtard
IOW: "Solve the case for Mueller right now or it's a nothing burger!"

You've tried this silly tactic before, I'm no eLawyer; I leave that to you.

Who said solve the case? If Trump Jr. committed a crime CITE THE CRIME.

What did he do that was illegal? If you don't know if it was illegal, then this "is what clinton did legal?" is pointless, because you don't have any illegal behavior of Trump Jrs to contrast that with. So if you're basing your argument solely on legalities it fails.

Originally posted by Surtur
So here is what happens Rob: either what both did are okay are both are shit.

You need to choose. Prove you can see both sides for what they are. Or prove you aren't to be taken seriously.

-One is hiring what amounts to a private investigator

-One amounts to possible collusion with a foreign government, or the intent to do so

What you're doing now is equalization tactics, because you realize one is actually potentially far more damaging so you try and make them be equal as a means to lesson the blow on the side you're biased towards. You did similar in the Charlottesville thread in regards to the Neo Nazi/White Nationals and the people protesting against them.

Originally posted by Robtard
-One is hiring what amounts to a private investigator

-One amounts to possible collusion with a foreign government, or the intent to do so

What you're doing now is equalization tactics, because you realize one is actually potentially far more damaging so you try and make them be equal as a means to lesson the blow on the side you're biased towards. You did similar in the Charlottesville thread in regards to the Neo Nazi/White Nationals and the people protesting against them.

Rob, neither of the things you mentioned are illegal though. Being shady and being illegal aren't always the same thing.

So if you want to play this out with "is it illegal?!" it makes no sense.

IOW: If LEGALITY is what matters, neither did anything wrong.