Thor trilogy invades DC cinematic universe

Originally posted by Robtard
For the purpose of this fight, Thor doesn't need to breathe as he's shown the ability to survive just fine in the vacuum of space for lengths of time.

So your point of whether Thor needs to breathe at all is pointless, unless you imagine this fight will take place underwater and last a very long time?

Wasn't Thor unconcious whilst on space? He was alive not fine.

Nidavellir is a different thing. His exposure to "the void" was shorter. Also we saw Rocket unharmed whilst in the rings.

Thor could endure underwater for a period. But not forever.

Underwater Aquaman would have the advantage.

He is way faster
He can command fish, other Atlantians, the negative zone creatures.
He commands the Kraken
He commands all Atlantean tech.
He has the visibility adv (Thor wouldn't be able to see properly).

Aquaman has the clear adv.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
So you are saying that Thor breathes just for the sake of breathing!? 😂 You are bringing an absolute. You want to claim Thor doesn't require to breathe, prove it. To endure a time without breathing doesn't back such a claim.

Dude, you need to work on your logic.

Please quote me saying that Thor can't use lightning under water.

I clearly stated there were no feats of Thor using lightning under water. Not that one can't speculate.

You're strawmanning all over the place just so you can side step my double standard accusation.

In any case, I think pretty much everyone here agrees that Aquaman won't be able to drown Thor in this match. If you wish to believe otherwise then go for it, everyone knows it's a silly point anyway.

Originally posted by FrothByte
You're strawmanning all over the place just so you can side step my double standard accusation.

In any case, I think pretty much everyone here agrees that Aquaman won't be able to drown Thor in this match. If you wish to believe otherwise then go for it, everyone knows it's a silly point anyway.

Saying that Thor never needs to breathe is a no limit fallacy.

Thor needs to breathe at some point unless stated otherwise by the movie.

If you want to continue playing blind man to your fallacies, then there is no point in continuing this debate.

Originally posted by FrothByte
You're throwing around red herrings all so you can side step my double standard accusation.

In any case, I think pretty much everyone here agrees that Aquaman won't be able to drown Thor in this match. If you wish to believe otherwise then go for it, everyone knows it's a silly point anyway.

Let's be honest, We all know why josh wants to give Aquaman the win.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Let's be honest, We all know why josh wants to give Aquaman the win.

I don't 'want', I have given Aquaman the win in underwater conditions.

It's called being objective, something you and Froth seem to forget when Thor is concerned.

Movie Feats Only.

Ok then, using movie feats only. explain how Aquaman gets Thor into the water.

Debating with josh is pointless. He dumb. Really dumb. He will probably not see anything wrong with a few of my sentences here.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Wasn't Thor unconcious whilst on space? He was alive not fine.

Nidavellir is a different thing. His exposure to "the void" was shorter. Also we saw Rocket unharmed whilst in the rings.

Thor could endure underwater for a period. But not forever.

Underwater Aquaman would have the advantage.

He is way faster
He can command fish, other Atlantians, the negative zone creatures.
He commands the Kraken
He commands all Atlantean tech.
He has the visibility adv (Thor wouldn't be able to see properly).

Aquaman has the clear adv.

Stands to reason he was unconscious because he was inside a ship that exploded, but he was still alive in the vaccuum of space. Which is the point.

We also see him outside on Nidavellir (space) while he restarted the rings and then held the rings open, again, in space; there would be zero oxygen in the iris. Rocket was onboard the ship.

So your whole point is that Aquaman can defeat Thor while underwater? Probably not despite the advantages, but why would Thor stay underwater when he can jut fly out?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Ok then, using movie feats only. explain how Aquaman gets Thor into the water.

Do you know what the word "should" implies SM?

Should means 'in the given case'.

I never stated Thor would get into the water. I stated that in the given case it happens, Thor would be in trouble.

Stop trying to troll.

Oh, I think Thor would go into the water, he'd fly in, grab Arthur when they clashed axe to trident and then fly both of them out.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Do you know what the word "should" implies SM?

Should means 'in the given case'.

I never stated Thor would get into the water. I stated that in the given case it happens, Thor would be in trouble.

Stop trying to troll.

If Thor never gets into the water, then Aquaman has zero chance of beating him in the water.

Thanks for admitting Aquaman has zero chance of winning.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Do you know what the word "should" implies SM?

Should means 'in the given case'.

I never stated Thor would get into the water. I stated that in the given case it happens, Thor would be in trouble.

Stop trying to troll.

Originally posted by Robtard
Stands to reason he was unconscious because he was inside a ship that exploded, but he was still alive in the vaccuum of space. Which is the point.

We also see him outside on Nidavellir (space) while he restarted the rings and then held the rings open, again, in space; there would be zero oxygen in the iris. Rocket was onboard the ship.

So your whole point is that Aquaman can defeat Thor while underwater? Probably not despite the advantages, but why would Thor stay underwater when he can jut fly out?

Alive, not in fine conditions. Also, there's no saying for how long would he survive. He was very weak.

He was outside the rings for a breif time. Am not refuting Thor's incredible endurance.

Rocket was inside the Rings along with Groot and Eitri.

Yes..That was my whole point. But Froth and SM seem to think Thor invincible.

Should the battle be taken inland Aquaman would hold no chance.

Originally posted by Silent Master
If Thor never gets into the water, then Aquaman has zero chance of beating him in the water.

Thanks for admitting Aquaman has zero chance of winning.

Yeap. "If".

If you would have read my original post carefully, all this would have been avoided.

But no, you seem to lose reason when Thor is concerned.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Yeap. "If".

If you would have read my original post carefully, all this would have been avoided.

But no, you seem to lose reason when Thor is concerned.

Thanks for admitting that Aquaman has zero chance of winning.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Yes.

Aquaman would defeat Thor underwater.

Otherwise no.

My original claim.

Seems everyone just ignored it.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
My original claim.

Seems everyone just ignored it.

Which you haven't proven.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Thanks for admitting that Aquaman has zero chance of winning.

Thanks for admitting you don't know the meaning of "if".

Originally posted by Silent Master
Which you haven't proven.

You haven't watched the movie.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Thanks for admitting you don't know the meaning of "if".

Thanks for admitting that you can't prove that Aquaman would beat Thor underwater.