Originally posted by Adam_PoE
There you go, getting trigger by Lena Dunham again.
How is Surtur highlighting her bullshits triggering?
Does this mean every time you guys post something about conservatives, either true or false, we can just say you're being trigger?
You how idiotic it would be if we indeed play this game.
Either side needs to be upheld to the standards of right and wrong. Nothing more, nothing less.
So Surt, are you aware of the specifics of this case? If not, then you're not in much of a position to be calling "bullsh!t" on someone's opinion on something you have no knowledge of.
It's pretty clear from the article that by "women don't lie about rape", she meant that as in "usually women don't lie about rape", hence the 3% statistic.
Be it natural bias for her friend, or be it actual specific knowledge about her close friend, she doesn't believe this accusation is like the typical accusation of rape.
You're just assuming both that she's wrong and that she was intentionally being wrong without any proof.
Originally posted by Rockydonovang
So Surt, are you aware of the specifics of this case? If not, then you're not in much of a position to be calling "bullsh!t" on someone's opinion on something you have no knowledge of.
So Rocky, I don't give a shit lol. It's not about the case. It's about this "feminist" doing a "woman lie about their lunch, not rape!" and then "herp derp, she's lying" when it's one of her friends.
Where did she learn that? To believe when advantageous...and disbelieve when advantageous? What female figure could have taught such a lesson?
Originally posted by Surtur
So Rocky, I don't give a shit lol. It's not about the case. It's about this "feminist" doing a "woman lie about their lunch, not rape!" and then "herp derp, she's lying" when it's one of her friends.
Originally posted by Surtur
Where did she learn that? To believe when advantageous...and disbelieve when advantageous? [/B]
Again, you're assuming intent and motive behind Lena's stated belief that you have no proof of.
You also have no way of determining whether or not said belief is wrong.
You're projecting your own initial, unsubstantiated, impression of someone to be the truth.
Two of Bill Clinton’s accusers hit back at Hillary after she claimed they ‘misremembered’ assaults
Just remember: Hilary is 100% willing to believe that a woman has misremembered a sexual assault with her husband.
Originally posted by Rockydonovang
You're assuming she's lying without actually knowing anything about the credibility of the accusation. I could just as easily assume that about anyone accused of rape even when they're not necessarily accurate accusations.Again, you're assuming intent and motive behind Lena's stated belief that you have no proof of.
You also have no way of determining whether or not said belief is wrong.
You're projecting your own initial, unsubstantiated, impression of someone to be the truth.
Lol holy shit. She flat out says women do not lie about rape. Then she comes and...oh look, now they lie about rape.
What is hard to get? I never said she was lying, she could be, who knows. Could be truthful. It's the hypocrisy that is the issue. Woman just full on don't lie about rape....until they do, I guess?
Originally posted by Surtur
Lol holy shit. She flat out says women do not lie about rape. Then she comes and...oh look, now they lie about rape.What is hard to get? I never said she was lying, she could be, who knows. Could be truthful. It's the hypocrisy that is the issue. Woman just full on don't lie about rape....until they do, I guess?
It's pretty clear from the article that by "women don't lie about rape", she meant that as in "usually women don't lie about rape", hence the 3% statistic.Be it natural bias for her friend, or be it actual specific knowledge about her close friend, she doesn't believe this accusation is like the typical accusation of rape.
It's hyperbole, it's something we regularly use in language.
I can say "dogs don't like cats", that doesn't mean there aren't exceptions where dogs like cats.
Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Addressed:It's hyperbole, it's something we regularly use in language.
I can say "dogs don't like cats", that doesn't mean there aren't exceptions where dogs like cats.
And isn't it quite lucky that one of those rare instances of someone lying about rape just happened to be Lena's good friend?
Life is so quirky that way, don't you think?
Obviously Hilary was using hyperbole too. She didn't mean ALL women have the right to be believed, and once again another rare happening: all the women who happened to accuse her husband were the few who shouldn't be believed.
Such awesome luck for these liberal gals.
Originally posted by Surtur
Was Trump being hyperbolic on his access hollywood tape, Rocky? Or just literal? What do you think? No, correct?
Also, Trump's tape is much stronger evidence for sexual assault than anything you've provided for those accusing Lena's friend.
Originally posted by SquallX
How is Surtur highlighting her bullshits triggering?Does this mean every time you guys post something about conservatives, either true or false, we can just say you're being trigger?
You how idiotic it would be if we indeed play this game.
Either side needs to be upheld to the standards of right and wrong. Nothing more, nothing less.
Because he has posted about her over 50 times across 10 threads, even in subjects that do not have anything directly to do with her. She is his go-to liberal strawman, despite no liberal here actually defending her or supporting her ever. She is an easy punching bag for when he needs a pretend victory. So, yeah, when follows her every word and deed, and feels compelled to post about it, he is triggered.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Because he has posted about her over 50 times across 10 threads, even in subjects that do not have anything directly to do with her. She is his go-to liberal strawman, despite no liberal here actually defending her or supporting her ever. She is an easy punching bag for when he needs a pretend victory. So, yeah, when follows her every word and deed, and feels compelled to post about it, he is triggered.
Lmao. I don't follow her every word. If a story about her pops up on a site I read I will talk about it.
Nobody forced her to insert herself into this. Not my fault she did, stop whining.
EDIT: And I truly hope you did go and legitimately search how many times I've mentioned her. 50 times, out of thousands of posts? Okay lol.
Originally posted by Surtur
Lmao. I don't follow her every word. If a story about her pops up on a site I read I will talk about it.Nobody forced her to insert herself into this. Not my fault she did, stop whining.
EDIT: And I truly hope you did go and legitimately search how many times I've mentioned her. 50 times, out of thousands of posts? Okay lol.
You know how many times a story about her pops up on a site I read? Zero. Because I give zero ****s about her, what she says, and what she does. The fact that the media you consume reports on her so often is a testament to the fake outrage culture you constantly decry, while completely wallowing in. Right-wing media report, "ZOMG, read what she said/did this time," you get your fix of conservative outrage, and rush to repost it here, "ZOMG, liberulz!" It is as Pavlovian as it is predictable.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
You know how many times a story about her pops up on a site I read? Zero. Because I give zero ****s about her, what she says, and what she does. The fact that the media you consume reports on her so often is a testament to the fake outrage culture you constantly decry, while completely wallowing in. Right-wing media report, "ZOMG, read what she said/did this time," you get your fix of conservative outrage, and rush to repost it here, "ZOMG, liberulz!" It is as Pavlovian as it is predictable.
Lol, tell us all what sites you read.
None of them better contain a story about this thing with Lena. So drop those names.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
You know how many times a story about her pops up on a site I read? Zero. Because I give zero ****s about her, what she says, and what she does. The fact that the media you consume reports on her so often is a testament to the fake outrage culture you constantly decry, while completely wallowing in. Right-wing media report, "ZOMG, read what she said/did this time," you get your fix of conservative outrage, and rush to repost it here, "ZOMG, liberulz!" It is as Pavlovian as it is predictable.
She shows up on none of mine, as well.
It's on CNN, it's on HuffPo, but then wait....I don't even care lol. I don't care if it's only in the newspaper for a preschool. I'll post what I choose. If people are going to insert themselves into these scandals...you get commented on.
Speaking of:
Writer quits feminist Lena Dunham’s newsletter, accuses her of ‘hipster racism’ in scathing letter
Owned.