Originally posted by Surtur
My question is why we don't see this kind of whining about prayers after an Islamic terror attack.We also saw comments from leftists(I don't think on this specific site) going "they were in a church and prayers sure as hell didn't help!". Why is it we did not hear leftists saying stuff like that after an attack on a mosque, for example?
You're twisting the narrative again and being disingenuous. When there's an Islamic terrorist attack, people talk about changes and things get changed, it's not just "thoughts and prayers" most current is the travel ban and vetting Muslim Americans, or attempts there of.
And maybe if you've already forgotten, but after 9/11 a little something called "Homeland Security" was implemented. Might want to read up on that. It's more than just "thoughts and prayers", it's laws into action.
(Sorry to pwn you again so hard in the same day. But I felt it was necessary)
Originally posted by Robtard
You're twisting the narrative again and being disingenuous. When there's an Islamic terrorist attack, people talk about changes and things get changed, it's not just "thoughts and prayers" most current is the travel ban and vetting Muslim Americans, or attempts there of.
What major changes happened after the recent NYC attack?
And maybe if you've already forgotten, but after 9/11 a little something called "Homeland Security" was implemented. Might want to read up on that. It's more than just "thoughts and prayers", it's laws into action.
That was over 15 years ago.
(Sorry to pwn you again so hard in the same day. But I felt it was necessary)
Lol, you haven't owned me a single time today.
Originally posted by Robtard
What major changes happened after Las Vegas? But the Muslim travel ban happened, at least in part. So you're clearly wrong and I am clearly correct.
But...who said major changes happened after Vegas? And the Muslim ban is only partially happening, and even then leftists are screaming about it. There is not some massive change every single time we have an Islamic terror attack.
And Homeland Security is still around today, which is the point.
Okay, but it wouldn't negate the lack of "whats the point of prayers?!".
(Yes I have, other's saw it and commented)
No, you really haven't. The only person who agreed with you was DDM, who I'm doubting had any idea of the context, just like I doubt he went and checked the dates of the posts.
But of course, DDM more or less called you mentally ill as well in another thread, didn't he? So..
Originally posted by Robtard
But there has been changes and policies made; which is the point and destroys your narrative.It further negates the narrative you're trying to push here, actually.
I suppose if we've had zero changes in policy in the last decade or two to guns you'd have a point. I can't say for sure if that is true.
(You're flipping out over this, lol)
So we're back to this tactic? Neat.
Yep...Pretty much.
Originally posted by snowdragon
So more guns fixes violence associated with guns, check.
True, like what could possibly go wrong if everyone was going about with a full auto assault fire and 100round clips? It's well known that everyone who buys a gun is responsible and takes basic shooting/safety courses and they'd never accidentally hit an innocent bystander when taking down criminals. Might as well allow grenade launchers, nothing says "home and personal security" like that.
**** it, should try it as a social experiment
Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]There are studied done to back that up. [/B]
I believe you.
But if the issue is gun violence.
We use guns to prevent said violence,
which creates an obvious circle of violence that builds upon itself.
I don't know the answer eludes me but the problem is obviously looking right at us.