Mass Shootings in America Thread

Started by Surtur264 pages
Originally posted by Robtard
Repeat: How do you think that's going to go over when the next shooting happens though?

I'm guessing we'll see a bunch of uninformed people spew some BS and make fools of themselves agian, all the while giving valid evidence to the fears of law abiding gun owners.

These kids got used, how embarrassing. Parroting fake news talking points on CNN in front of millions.

CNN had no problem discrediting a shooting victim cause he refused to read their scripted questions.

Leftist are always torn up in these such events....using Dead Children or the Live ones...

Wait a minute, they refused a question about armed guards. Now we know there WAS someone there who was armed...but just failed to go in....weird.

Originally posted by Surtur
Wait a minute, they refused a question about armed guards. Now we know there WAS someone there who was armed...but just failed to go in....weird.

No no no. The Guard didn't 'FAIL to Go IN" That would imply that He TRIED to help those kids. This guy hide outside like a little shit.

They actually say "You're either with us or against us on gun control"

Only a Sith deals in absolutes.

Originally posted by Surtur
I'm guessing we'll see a bunch of uninformed people spew some BS and make fools of themselves agian, all the while giving valid evidence to the fears of law abiding gun owners.

These kids got used, how embarrassing. Parroting fake news talking points on CNN in front of millions.

I disagree, we're talking about people being murdered, it's not going to go over well for people talking about 'we need more guns, we need less gun restrictions'. Right or wrong, this is just a fact.

But hey, you got to do a pretend personal victory again; that's the important part.

Originally posted by Surtur
They actually say "You're either with us or against us on gun control"

Only a Sith deals in absolutes.

You just made an absolute statement, sport

Leftists believe in Absolute Tyranny.

Originally posted by Robtard
I disagree, we're talking about people being murdered, it's not going to go over well for people talking about 'we need more guns, we need less gun restrictions'. Right or wrong, this is just a fact.

But hey, you got to do a pretend personal victory again; that's the important part.

The crazies will just shriek their same talking points.

Originally posted by Robtard
You just made an absolute statement, sport

Tell that to Obi Wan.

Originally posted by Robtard
You just made an absolute statement, sport

YOu are such a Quanchie some times Rob.

Originally posted by Blindside12
So you agree with how dumb our society has become with these grandstanding gotcha questions cheered on by the masses who get their news on Twitter?
Yeah, but I honestly believe that humans have been devolving in intelligence for a while now.

Originally posted by Blindside12
What about the FBI being cowards to detain this guy since they knew who he was and they knew he was high risk?

Blame lies at the feet of the FBI for this shooting, they knew, they did nothing.

The FBI did not respond, because the national tip line did not forward the information to the Miami office.

And even if the Miami office did receive the information, Cruz still has 5th and 14th Amendment rights.

According to your own source, had law enforcement received the information, the shooting may not have been stopped:

Originally posted by Blindside12
Yea, Oh.

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/02/16/586502989/fbi-received-a-tip-last-month-about-the-parkland-shooter-but-nothing-was-done

But keep shitting on American law enforcement. I realize those are the new Trump cuck marching orders. To quote Assistant to the President and White House Press Secretary Sarah Hucakbee Sanders, "When you're attacking FBI agents because you're under criminal investigation, you're losing."

The left has been shitting on law enforcement for 30 years👆

Funny you want to give Cruz his 5th and 14th Ammendments but didn't care when Obama administration was shitting on those same Ammendments.

And you want to protect Cruz rights with those but take away everyone else's 2nd

Libtards 101

Originally posted by Blindside12
Why do the cities with the strictest gun laws (Chicago, DC) have the most gun deaths?

America's Gun Problem Explained in 5 Facts

If a city or state passes strict gun control measures, people can simply cross a border to buy guns in a jurisdiction with laxer laws.

Chicago, for example, requires a Firearm Owners Identification card, a background check, a three-day waiting period, and documentation for all firearm sales. But Indiana, across the border, doesn’t require any of this for purchases between two private individuals (including those at gun shows and those who meet through the internet), allowing even someone with a criminal record to buy a firearm without passing a background check or submitting paperwork recording the sale.

So someone from Chicago can drive across the border—to Indiana or to other places with lax gun laws—and buy a gun without any of the big legal hurdles he would face at home. Then that person can resell or give guns to others in Chicago or keep them, leaving no paper trail behind. (This is illegal trafficking under federal law, but Indiana’s lax laws and enforcement—particularly the lack of a paper trail—make it virtually impossible to catch someone until a gun is used in a crime.)

The result: According to a 2014 report from the Chicago Police Department, nearly 60 percent of the guns in crime scenes that were recovered and traced between 2009 and 2013 came from outside the state. About 19 percent came from Indiana—making it the most common state of origin for guns besides Illinois.

This isn’t exclusive to Chicago. A 2016 report from the New York State Office of the Attorney General found that 74 percent of guns used in crimes in New York between 2010 and 2015 came from states with lax gun laws. (The gun trafficking chain from Southern states with weak gun laws to New York is so well-known it even has a name: “the Iron Pipeline.”) And another 2016 report from the US Government Accountability Office found that most of the guns—as much as 70 percent—used in crimes in Mexico, which has strict gun laws, can be traced back to the US, which has generally weaker gun laws.

That doesn’t mean the stricter gun laws in Chicago, New York, or any other jurisdiction have no effect, but it does limit how far these local and state measures can go, since the root of the problem lies in other places’ laws. The only way the pipeline could be stopped would be if all states individually strengthened their gun laws at once—or, more realistically, if the federal government passed a law that enforces stricter rules across the US.

Nice, ignore my other responses to your responses by changing the subject with nothing that refutes what I said

Originally posted by Blindside12
Funny you want to give Cruz his 5th and 14th Ammendments but didn't care when Obama administration was shitting on those same Ammendments.

And you want to protect Cruz rights with those but take away everyone else's 2nd

Libtards 101

By all means, whose 5th and 14th Amendment rights did the Obama administration shit on?

Moreover, any sensible person should defend the Constitutional rights of others, especially people accused or suspected of crimes. If law enforcement can decide to selectively ignore the Constitutional rights of Cruz, they can decide to suspend yours too. If you want to enjoy the protections the Constitution affords, you have to apply those protections equally to everyone.

Furthermore, whom is advocating abolishing the 2nd Amendment? All Constitutional rights, including the right to bear arms, are subject to reasonable regulations. Gun control advocates are only seeking improved regulations, not abolition.

Any more pissy little Straw Men?

Wow. Adam lays the DOUBLE Standards on Pretty Thick.