Originally posted by Silent Master
Your comment was about fully automatic weapons, that is what I'm questioning. just admit you were using semi and fully auto interchangeably due to lack of knowledge.
No, thats what you interpreted it as. Not my problem. Not to mention that instead of talking to me as a human being, and asking me to clarify, you used it as a modus of attack and came in swinging. You were not even questioning, you were interrogating.
Originally posted by Surtur
It was more towards most leftists participating, but dude you can sometimes come off as...it almost sounds like you are lecturing people lol.
Kinda hard to do that considering tone is absent in a text based forum. But that being said, I still do not understand the defense of firearms in America. Maybe thats a byproduct of my Australian influence with regards to guns, but we've simply never needed them, especially to the degree you guys espouse over there. We still have access to firearms, and our gun crime is simply not so high, even now when our population is ballooning.
Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
Except I do, and you who have not been trained have no room to compare. But please, continue assuming.Point to me where Surter made that distinction SM, please. Because yes, I know that AKs can come in Semi, but when you think of assault rifles, do you default to semi or auto? When i hear AK, I actually am trained to assume the greater danger, as is most reasonable people. "Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst" is a method I use. If you think that is wrong, then you sir are a fool in my eyes.
Your comments prove otherwise, as you didn't know that firing at the range and in a life or death situation are completely different. you also didn't know that AK's come in semi-auto.
You are the definition of a little knowledge(very little) is a dangerous thing.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Yes, take away the stick(gun) from the criminals, not from everyone.Glad you agree with us.
Lol these people were probably the type of kids who were secretly glad when they were younger and in school and the entire class got punished for something only a few kids did.
Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
No, thats what you interpreted it as. Not my problem. Not to mention that instead of talking to me as a human being, and asking me to clarify, you used it as a modus of attack and came in swinging. You were not even questioning, you were interrogating.Kinda hard to do that considering tone is absent in a text based forum. But that being said, I still do not understand the defense of firearms in America. Maybe thats a byproduct of my Australian influence with regards to guns, but we've simply never needed them, especially to the degree you guys espouse over there. We still have access to firearms, and our gun crime is simply not so high, even now when our population is ballooning.
I've already quoted you saying fully automatic.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Your comments prove otherwise, as you didn't know that firing at the range and in a life or death situation are completely different. you also didn't know that AK's come in semi-auto.
What comments?
And you don't know the difference between training and practicing... so you lecturing me on anything is laughable. And yes, i did know. Read the very post you quote, if you cannot at the very least do that, then stop replying to me. Courtesy goes a long way.
Originally posted by Silent Master
You are the definition of a little knowledge(very little) is a dangerous thing.
HAH, and this proves you have selective reading. You do not change your methods.
Originally posted by Silent Master
I've already quoted you saying fully automatic.
You took the post out of context as you always do SM. You read only what you wanted and ignored the rest, so now you can dissappear, and be ignored because you have no common courtesy to even follow the rest of the conversation, and even cut entire contexts out of singular posts to suit yourself.
Tell me, does it make your dick feel all chubbly when you claim I have no knowledge on a subject even tho I explain context repeatedly?
Does it make you feel special to chop up inconvenient parts of conversations and posts to say "I pwned joo on KMC!"
Mate, you need a better hobby.
You know, when I was younger I was an outsider in what most would consider to be a very small school. I wore black makeup and trench coats before the idea of a "trench coat mafia" was ever recognized by the masses. I also hated my classmates and wanted them all dead. When I heard about Columbine all I could think was "why did those morons pick something as stupid as guns to try to wipe out as many people as possible". Within half an hour I came up with a far better way of killing a larger number of my classmates. It would have taken 10 bucks and a trip to Wal Mart. Seriously, all these pitches for a MUCH higher level of gun control won't actually make a positive difference in regards to mass killings.
Originally posted by darthgoober
You know, when I was younger I was an outsider in what most would consider to be a very small school. I wore black makeup and trench coats before the idea of a "trench coat mafia" was ever recognized by the masses. I also hated my classmates and wanted them all dead. When I heard about Columbine all I could think was "why did those morons pick something as stupid as guns to try to wipe out as many as possible". Within half an hour I came up with a far better way of killing a larger number of my classmates. It would have taken 10 bucks and a trip to Wal Mart. Seriously, all these pitches for a MUCH higher level of gun control won't actually make a positive difference in regards to mass killings.
Why not? It worked here.
Originally posted by Silent Master
I've already quoted you saying fully-automatic.
Yeah, while cutting out the entire context for me saying that. So what is the point?
Originally posted by Silent Master
It's impossible to have a nuanced discussion when one side doesn't know the difference between semi and fully automatic. plus don't know that firing in a life and death situation is different from firing at a range.
Wrong on both counts. Surter never made the distinction, so I had to. Nobody bothered to ask and yet somehow thats my fault even though I didn't start that line.
And unless you know of my work record, how many dangerous and life threatening situations I've been in in my career, you do not get to talk about that. All i said was I never ever drew my weapon during those situations because I didn't want blood on my hands. I always found another way. Obviously you don't like the idea of taking 6 rounds or less to kill someone, because you want your shooty bangbangs to have as much dakka as possible. 30 rounds not enough? Gonna switch you your 100 round drum mag bro?
Originally posted by darthgoober
Australia didn't have anywhere near as severe of a problem as we do in this regards. Our countries cultures are very different.
They also don't have a 2nd amendment. And they also went about accomplishing what they did in more or less one of the ways gun nuts fear the US government will try to take their weapons.
And Obama praised it.
If they want to do similar things here I just want them to be 100% crystal clear about it and admit to what their end game truly is.
Originally posted by Robtard
Prepare yourself for a roll coaster ride of loops, spins, dips and drops.
Nope, I figured a fellow Australian would be the best one to explain it to him so I was just going to point him in her direction...
Originally posted by Surtur
They also don't have a 2nd amendment. And they also went about accomplishing what they did in more or less one of the ways gun nuts fear the US government will try to take their weapons.And Obama praised it.
If they want to do these things I just want them to be 100% crystal clear about it and admit to what their end game truly is.
Does banning ar-15 style rifles mean to take away your guns. I have several guns, I'm guessing more than you why/how does that diminish the 2nd amendment?
Originally posted by snowdragon
Does banning ar-15 style rifles mean to take away your guns. I have several guns, I'm guessing more than you why/how does that diminish the 2nd amendment?
I have yet to see a single person give me a valid reason why millions of people who do not use AR-15's unlawfully should have them taken away?
Originally posted by darthgoober
Not really, the amendment is an indication of just how radically our general cultures and mindsets are.
Yes really.
The fact that the 2md amendment is an amendment means our constitutional laws can be changed, if the will of the people want it. So going "but muh 2nd!" like it's some unassailable shield is silly.