US Supreme Pizza Part II: Bake a Cake

Originally posted by Nephthys
What about the people feeling uncomfortable that the only pastry chef in 200 miles is refusing them service based on discrimination? Does your heart not feel anything for them?

Originally posted by Nephthys
I'm no scholar either but I'm sure Jesus charged people for his carpentry. And sometimes I'm sure he had to do work for people he didn't agree with.

This is pure speculation. This is not within canon Jesus' powerset. You can't go to the EU for feats. Only the official Elohim approved OT and NT series.

Originally posted by Nephthys
I'm no scholar either but I'm sure Jesus charged people for his carpentry. And sometimes I'm sure he had to do work for people he didn't agree with.

Originally posted by Robtard
What's a "gay themed cake"?

Originally posted by dadudemon
I really really doesn't matter, though. Who cares what the bible says on this specific topic? He doesn't want to decorate a cake. Don't force him to.

It was a response to "it's his religious beliefs" being used to cover for the baker's discrimination practices

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
Oh sure, act like you don't know.

Edit: nm I don't wanna go the way of intrepid

Originally posted by Robtard
It was a response to "it's his religious beliefs" being used to cover for the baker's discrimination practices

Yes, yes, I know.

Only a matter of time before we're dealing with mandatory incest and pedo cakes too. The slippery slope is real folks.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
My heart does feel for them, I just don't feel threatening the pastry chef with force to make him express something he disagrees with is an appropriate solution.

I think you keep using the term "force" because "a hundred dollar fine" doesn't sound scary enough.

Originally posted by dadudemon
This is pure speculation. This is not within canon Jesus' powerset. You can't go to the EU for feats. Only the official Elohim approved OT and NT series.

Its canon bro. In John #56 Satan asked for a gay set of stocks and Jesus made it for him anyway. Of course it turned out to be a plot by Lex Luthor to steal Jesus' bread and fish, and thats awful but still.

Originally posted by Robtard
IOW, you made a claim you can't support.

Lol no I didn't. I can fully support that he says this is based on his understanding of biblical teachings. I never claimed to know which specific part of the bible his understanding comes from.

Originally posted by Nephthys
I think you keep using the term "force" because "a hundred dollar fine" doesn't sound scary enough.

This is a fundamental truth about every law imposed by the government.

But no I don't think the government should violate your property rights over refusing to express yourself in a way you disagree with.

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
Only a matter of time before we're dealing with mandatory incest and pedo cakes too. The slippery slope is real folks.

Those can be denied on grounds that incest (at least in some states) and pedo-stuff is illegal

Granted, I know there are plenty of "Christian" Americans who want to make same-sex marriage illegal and even gay sex illegal. Roy Moore is one of these people.

Originally posted by Robtard
Did you hear rattling? Do you really believe "I was not rude though" is an excuse for discrimination

Lol, I never once said I believed that. This is what you said:

Originally posted by Robtard
But SM made a point on this early on, the baker should have just said "I can't, I'm too busy to fulfill your order in time, sorry" or the like, not a "get out of my store, you queers!" type of response. Sure he's still a silly ****ing bigot.

This is not at all what happened. I never said it excused anything. There is, however, a difference between politely telling someone your stance on something and "get out you queer!".

And you said a "but he was not rude", which I pointed out isn't grounds for excusing discrimination.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Its canon bro. In John #56 Satan asked for a gay set of stocks and Jesus made it for him anyway. Of course it turned out to be a plot by Lex Luthor to steal Jesus' bread and fish, and thats awful but still.

Yes, but Luthor was onto something: self-replicating matter.

Originally posted by Robtard
And you said a "but he was not rude", which I pointed out isn't grounds for excusing discrimination.

And I am pointing out that I never said it was grounds for it. I merely pointed out you were quite wrong in your description of events. You're welcome.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
A fine backed by the threat of prison time backed by the threat of physical violence.

This is a fundamental truth about every law imposed by the government.

But no I don't think the government should violate your property rights over refusing to express yourself in a way you disagree with.

Thats asinine.

I guess parking tickets are threats of force now too.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Yes, but Luthor was onto something: self-replicating matter.

Lex Luthor stole 40 fish. That is four 10's, and that's terrible.

Originally posted by Surtur
And I am pointing out that I never said it was grounds for it. I merely pointed out you were quite wrong in your description of events. You're welcome.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Thats asinine.

I guess parking tickets are threats of force now too.

Yes, they actually are..

Usually, you have to pay your fines and taxes or there are bad consequences that up to and including incarceration.

Citations:

https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/criminal-defense/defendants-rights/unpaid-speeding-parking-tickets.htm

http://tax.findlaw.com/tax-problems-audits/can-you-go-to-jail-for-not-paying-taxes.html