Originally posted by KingD19
Wasn't Butcher slicing bullets out of the air and almost killed Wesley?
From around 0:46. In particular, at 0:49-0:50, they do a quick close up to show a bullet getting sliced.
Originally posted by Silent MasterNot really. If the bullet is in slow motion then it is easier to put the blade in the path of a 1cm bullet when you already have the blade up in the path already. Veidt didn't even have his hands up.
Not true at all, blocking a bullet with a blade is far harder than catching one in your hand
Originally posted by Silent Master
Not true at all, blocking a bullet with a blade is far harder than catching one in your hand
Especially multiple shots, from a modern gun, while charging your opponent. And without falling over in the process. But it's H1. He would probably argue that the Miyagi arrow catch was better lol.
Originally posted by h1a8
Not really. If the bullet is in slow motion then it is easier to put the blade in the path of a 1cm bullet when you already have the blade up in the path already. Veidt didn't even have his hands up.
If you really think blocking something with the edge of a blade is easier than catching something in your hand, then you really aren't as smart as you want people to believe you are.
Originally posted by Silent Master
If you really think blocking something with the edge of a blade is easier than catching something in your hand, then you really aren't as smart as you want people to believe you are.
Notice how he also completely ignores the fact that the Butcher blocked several bullets without issue, instead of just one and then landing on the ground.
Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
Notice how he also completely ignores the fact that the Butcher blocked several bullets without issue, instead of just one and then landing on the ground.
My guess is after about 6 or 7 pages of claiming it's easier to catch something than to block it with the edge of a blade he will suddenly claim that he is merely using someone else's metric.
Originally posted by Silent Master
If you really think blocking something with the edge of a blade is easier than catching something in your hand, then you really aren't as smart as you want people to believe you are.
This can be applied to you for believing the opposite. It's actually common sense that it is easier to hold the blade in the path of a slow moving projectile than to catch it. Catching something takes multiple things to do.
Plus it's easier when the blade is already in front of you near the path of the bullet. It's like having your dukes up before a punch.
Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
Especially multiple shots, from a modern gun, while charging your opponent. And without falling over in the process. But it's H1. He would probably argue that the Miyagi arrow catch was better lol.
Multiple shots are irrelevant since each bullet is a lifetime from the next.
Originally posted by h1a8
This can be applied to you for believing the opposite. It's actually common sense that it is easier to hold the blade in the path of a slow moving projectile than to catch it. Catching something takes multiple things to do.Plus it's easier when the blade is already in front of you near the path of the bullet. It's like having your dukes up before a punch.
No, common sense would be that it's much easier to catch a moving object in your hand then it would be to actually manage to hit it with the edge of a sword.
Prove it, show a clip of you managing to hit a pellet with a sword as many times in a row as you can and I'll do the same for catching a pellet. We'll see who manages to have the higher number.
Originally posted by Silent MasterThen I'm afraid you lack common sense.
No, common sense would be that it's much easier to catch a moving object in your hand then it would be to actually manage to hit it with the edge of a sword.Prove it, show a clip of you managing to hit a pellet with a sword as many times in a row as you can and I'll do the same for catching a pellet. We'll see who manages to have the higher number.
You are ignoring that I stated the bullet is moving in slow motion. So if a slow moving bullet is moving towards you with your blade in front then it's extremely easy to just place the blade in the path of the bullet.
Multiple bullets are irrelevant. Each bullet is fired a lifetime from the next one.
Originally posted by h1a8
Then I'm afraid you lack common sense.You are ignoring that I stated the bullet is moving in slow motion. So if a slow moving bullet is moving towards you with your blade in front then it's extremely easy to just place the blade in the path of the bullet.
Multiple bullets are irrelevant. Each bullet is fired a lifetime from the next one.
Do you accept my challenge?