Originally posted by SunRazer
You obviously don't have a grasp of basic economics, because inflation means that the value of money changes over time and therefore box office numbers 40 years apart can't be treated equally. 😂
When you hear people talk about the top ten this is the list you mainly hear from which was my point.
Hey, kid I know that unadjusted what sold more tickets hence my comments. I know inflation cheapens or devalues the dollar. My point was when unadjusted TFA is in the top three not ANH.
Also just stop with the nonsense because at the time ANH was something that came at the right time and took the nation by storm which is harder to do I today's time given the MCU, dceu, the Potter films, the Lotr films or if you don't get my point by now it's simple. Epic fantasy and Sci Fi films are much more rampant and competitive for your dollar than say back in the late seventies.
TFA was a behemoth at the box office and acting like it's embarrassing is well ignorant to say the least.
Adjusting for inflation is the more accurate way of comparing which movie is bigger, and because each dollar was worth more back in 1977, ANH made more money by far (especially because its budget was so much smaller). It isn't close. Perform an R.O.I. calculation and ANH blows TFA out of the water. And yes, tickets sold is a similar indication.
If TFA didn't beat ANH in terms of unadjusted gross, that'd be ****ing embarrassing. It's bloody 40 years down the line, lol. So that's hardly a feat, as almost any major film these days would do that.
See, a truly huge film like Avatar still manages to top ANH when it's adjusted for inflation. So you don't need to whinge or whine; the adjusted system is actually fair and accurately conveys how big a movie is. The unadjusted values are basically a circlejerk for modern movies as all old ones are instantly thrown out the window due to inflation.
[/B]
Avatar is an insanely lucrative film which has the China market downpat but can it replicate its initial success or come close to it. I doubt it but we will find out in a few years time. TFA was a massive success as well though and don't try to pretend otherwise. We are talking about these films and comparing them to the entire history of cinematic box office so they are all heavyweights in their own right.
What you said before was:
In unadjusted terms, that's to be expected because TFA is far more recent than the other two trilogies and has more hype than TLJ and presumably Ep IX. So nobody cares about that.
ANH made more money in today's dollars. You can't use 2015 dollars for TFA and 1977 dollars for ANH. 😆
[/B]
When doing an unadjusted top ten you most certainly can do hence why we see lists doing it all the time. I explained this but you just kept rambling on anyways repeating yourself.
Actually, Gone with the Wind is widely renowned as the highest grossing film of all time by some distance, because adjusting for inflation is the more accurate way of comparing films' grosses from different eras. The fact that the unadjusted lists are also published quite widely doesn't change that. Those are good for a purely modern perspective. If you want to see the whole picture, then you need to adjust for inflation.
No, because you're in denial. If something's good for the ST, it becomes a sex toy. If something's good for the OT, well **** that, amirite? The entire point of this thread was for you to attack OT fans and wank the ST. [/B]
I know with tickets sold Gone with the Wind is up there but I don't argue that unless I say tickets sold or adjust for inflation.
I was right about the top three unadjusted. I created the thread to see how many Ot cucks were on this forum. I figured it was very high. Beni wanted the op rescinded and for us to freely attack each other. I granted the wish. If that's to harsh for you maybe kmc isn't for you.
Just for future reference when I make a point to cite an unadjusted list don't go on a rant complaining about it since my statement was accurate.
Don't be a snowflake.