CRAIGSLIST AD - LOOKING FOR STRONG-WILLED JUDGES
because BC in general is afraid of Ant doing crazy shit when he's mad tbh so ppl will have to make sure he doesn't go crazy if they vote against him
put it this way: when we get in flame wars and I talk to ppl in private, they say "please calm Ant down and don't tell him I said <insert> becuse I don't want him to get mad at me again"
-- The Ellimist, 2/11/2018
We are looking for five strong-willed judges that are not afraid of member DarthAnt66 getting mad at them if they vote against him.
Additional preferable qualities include: Asian, bisexual (soon-to-be homosexual), strong logician, progressive, American, likes Star Wars, dislikes Revan.
Any member still interested in judging despite the risk of facing the wrath of a fellow teenage forum member please reaffirm.
Eh, okay, a legit sign-up.
People think tht my usual acting makes me unable to judge seriously, so:
Based on what is seen here, within these two posts, I will vote for @caseiden pretty obviously. Within what is presented here, Caseiden's argument is more solid.First of all, when regarding Freedon Nadd, Caseiden focused on the idea that under combative pressure Freedon won't have the necessary time and space for direct Force usage. This is a very good idea, albeit it was supported by the author very briefly, not as largely and convincingly, as it could be done. He demonstrated Valin's and Antares's superiority as duelists, and used the Caedus fight in a... pretty weird, but actually interesting and refreshing light. What obviously caught my attention there, was that it was some larger analysis of the feat, different than the usual, simple comparisons of encyclopedic fight. It was a point I could, I think, easily debate, but was convincing in that it was refreshing. Skillz's response was focused on how Freedon is far more powerful, but it didn't help in any way. His argument didn't refer to the idea of Force usage prevention in a 2 vs. 1 situation. Simply put, Caseiden opted to start with the idea how Freedon's Force advantage is nullified by other parties, while Skillz misaddressed the point and simply started refering Freedon's power itself, which in no way serves to counter Caseiden's point. This part is totally in favor of Caseiden.
In terms of Ludo Kressh and the other two, both participants did good. Caseiden had better, more logical explanation on his take on 2 vs. 1 situation, and shorter arguments about the characters himself. Skillz did here better, providing better line of thought; the one improper argument about Ludo's influence on Exile (simply because it was the nexus of his tomb itself, there was no mention of Ludo himself anywhere, and the Korriban in itself was a great nexus, etc.) was nowhere rebutted obviously, and it didn't destroy his case in any way. A draw.
Aurra vs. Teneb is a different thing. Caseiden provided more content, more depictions of Aurra's combative capability and analyzed them properly (although, again, too briefly) to ensure their legitimacy. Caseiden provided simply the more convincing case for someone with no outside knowledge.
Tionne vs. Keto is too little of a case to be of value. Caseiden presented a broader knowledge of his character, using the narrative of the book and the nature of its content to support the notion of Tionne's potential preparation, but that's it.
LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO