Black Panther & Killmonger vs Thor

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
And????

Even with the hammer Thor lack's strength feats!!

The only strength feat i can grasp of Thor is him lifting the falling cars in AoU. Which by they way, it was Mjolnir lifting since Thor can't fly.

Besides that, only lifting Thor with a punch, which ain't enough to give him an edge with T'Challa or Killmonger.

So again, what strength feats!?

Thor sends Hulk flying and crashing into the wall in the arena, and Hulk is cratered into the wall and he's left disoriented for a few seconds. With one swing of a non-magical non Asgardian battlehammer by Thor.
This is before any lightning god Powers by Thor.
Thor's punches were also affecting Hulk and making his head turn around with each blow.

So my question is do you think Black Panther or even Spider-Man would be able to do the same or come close to that feat. with one swing from that Warhammer to Hulk? Or even Rock Hulk the way Thor's punches did with their own punches?

This is the same Hulk that was not really moved by a chitauri leviathan crashing into him.

These are actual screen feets seen in the movies they are not my opinion they are what is shown on screen.

Now answer the question.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander

This is a Pre Ragnarok Thor, read the thread's guidelines before debating Darth.

You think his pure Physical stats got amped in Ragnarok?

Hes gone toe to toe against Hulk twice without Mjolnir. Its called a consistent feat.

Originally posted by Inhuman
Thor sends Hulk flying and crashing into the wall in the arena, and Hulk is cratered into the wall and he's left disoriented for a few seconds. With one swing of a non-magical non Asgardian battlehammer by Thor.
This is before any lightning god Powers by Thor.
Thor's punches were also affecting Hulk and making his head turn around with each blow.

So my question is do you think Black Panther or even Spider-Man would be able to do the same or come close to that feat. with one swing from that Warhammer to Hulk? Or even Rock Hulk the way Thor's punches did with their own punches?

This is the same Hulk that was not really moved by a chitauri leviathan crashing into him.

These are actual screen feets seen in the movies they are not my opinion they are what is shown on screen.

Now answer the question.

Spider Man is well beyond Thor's level of power. Else go check Homecoming.

Again, this is Pre Ragnarok, which means Ragnarok footage is invalid for this debate.

Even so, striking with a tool and striking barehanded isn't the same thing!

The Leviathan feat is INVALID!

You can't compare both feats. In that scene, Hulk is clearly applying force against the Leviathan! Not getting punched.

So again, what feats?

Originally posted by Darth Thor
You think his pure Physical stats got amped in Ragnarok?

Hes gone toe to toe against Hulk twice without Mjolnir. Its called a consistent feat.

The OP clearly stated Pre-Ragnarok, so your feat is INVALID.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Spider Man is well beyond Thor's level of power.

😆
Okay so you're retarded, there's no point to even continue this argument with you.

Tank shells were not able to dent Tony's armor. Spider-Man would not be able to crush Tony's armor like paper like Thor.

Joshua, my friend, c'mon:

- Cap is not Thor's equal.
- Spider-Man is not more powerful than Thor.
- BP has a snowball's chance in a furnace of beating Thor.

Originally posted by Inhuman
😆 Okay so you're retarded, there's no point to even continue this argument with you.

Tank shells were not able to dent Tony's armor. Spider-Man would not be able to crush Tony's armor like paper like Thor.

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

CLEARLY. CLEARLY YOU ARE IGNORANT OF YOUR WORDS.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hs7DsjjABcA

Would you mind take a look at who overpowered Bucky's bionic arm? Which by the way, is able to outpower Cap, which by the way is able to pierce Tony's armor!?

Oh, and Spiderman didn't even struggle to outpower it.

As you said, " you're retarded, there's no point in even continue this argument with you." .

Your opinion is respected, although it's biased and misinformed.

Originally posted by John Murdoch
Joshua, my friend, c'mon:

- Cap is not Thor's equal.
- Spider-Man is not more powerful than Thor.
- BP has a snowball's chance in a furnace of beating Thor.

John, you know how we run ourselves here in KMC.

Without feats, it's useless.

1. Thor without a hammer doesn't have feats to back him up.

The only time we saw Thor portraying insane levels of strength was in Ragnarok!

This thread specifically states Pre-Ragnarok.

2. T'Challa and Killmonger are both better fighters than Thor.

3. They are armed with Vibranium weapons. (Loki was able to pierce and harm Thor with a blade not made of Vib).

4. It's Two against One.

5. They are covered with Vibranium.

Again, evidence contradicts Thor's victory.

Originally posted by John Murdoch

- Spider-Man is not more powerful than Thor.

Power and strength aren't interchangeable.

You are reasonable John. Reconsider this thread's situation.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Ohhh yes, that's right. Forgot that one.

A valid feat, if this were IM's suit being debated.

You asked for Thor feats, I gave you Thor feats. You don't get to disregard them because you don't like it.

Besides, IM's suit has way better durability feats than BP's. So Thor crushing IM's armor means he can much more easily do the same to BP.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
John, you know how we run ourselves here in KMC.

Without feats, it's useless.

1. Thor without a hammer doesn't have feats to back him up.

The only time we saw Thor portraying insane levels of strength was in Ragnarok!

This thread specifically states Pre-Ragnarok.

2. T'Challa and Killmonger are both better fighters than Thor.

3. They are armed with Vibranium weapons. (Loki was able to pierce and harm Thor with a blade not made of Vib).

4. It's Two against One.

5. They are covered with Vibranium.

Again, evidence contradicts Thor's victory.

1. We keep posting evidence of Thor fighting IM and Hulk barehanded. Why do you keep ignoring this?

2. T'Challa and Kilmonger are more acrobatic fighters, that doesn't necessarily mean they're better fighters. It's like claiming a TKD fighter is better than a pro boxer.

3. Loki is a LOT stronger than the panthers and was using a magical asgardian dagger. Why do you keep ignoring this?

4. Thor has taken on hordes of enemies before.

5. Thor has hurt both IM and Hulk who both have better durability feats than the vibranium suits.

Originally posted by FrothByte
You asked for Thor feats, I gave you Thor feats. You don't get to disregard them because you don't like it.

Besides, IM's suit has way better durability feats than BP's. So Thor crushing IM's armor means he can much more easily do the same to BP.

Does T'Challa or Killmonger have IM's suit? No, so the feat is invalid.

Based on what exactly? The movie was clear enough saying that Vibranium is stronger.

The Panther Suit is stronger than IM's suit based on movie feats.

Originally posted by FrothByte
1. We keep posting evidence of Thor fighting IM and Hulk barehanded. Why do you keep ignoring this?

2. T'Challa and Kilmonger are more acrobatic fighters, that doesn't necessarily mean they're better fighters. It's like claiming a TKD fighter is better than a pro boxer.

3. Loki is a LOT stronger than the panthers and was using a magical asgardian dagger. Why do you keep ignoring this?

4. Thor has taken on hordes of enemies before.

5. Thor has hurt both IM and Hulk who both have better durability feats than the vibranium suits.

I said John. You got your chance to bring evidence which you failed to do.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Does T'Challa or Killmonger have IM's suit? No, so the feat is invalid.

Based on what exactly? The movie was clear enough saying that Vibranium is stronger.

The Panther Suit is stronger than IM's suit based on movie feats.

What feats do the panther suits have to prove they're stronger than IM's? Remember that IM's suit has gotten hit by a tank shell amd had several cars fall on it.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
I said John. You got your chance to bring evidence which you failed to do.

You mean like how I mentioned Thor fought IM and Hulk barehanded yet you still keep saying Thor has no hammerless feats?

Originally posted by FrothByte
You mean like how I mentioned Thor fought IM and Hulk barehanded yet you still keep saying Thor has no hammerless feats?

I told you that he was 1) a troll and 2) not very smart.

Originally posted by FrothByte
What feats do the panther suits have to prove they're stronger than IM's? Remember that IM's suit has gotten hit by a tank shell amd had several cars fall on it.

I remember.

I also remember it being clearly stated in the Black Panther movie that vibranium is the strongest metal in the UNIVERSE. Last time i checked, BP's suit was made of Vibranium.

Originally posted by FrothByte
You mean like how I mentioned Thor fought IM and Hulk barehanded yet you still keep saying Thor has no hammerless feats?

I won't debate your misunderstandings. It's a known thing that you have a quality for bending feats, else the Depowered Thor vs Depowered T'Challa thread would be long time closed.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I told you that he was 1) a troll and 2) not very smart.

😂

Pathetic!

When the little boy can't defend himself he runs for help. TBH i thought you'd look for your brother Quan, yet somehow you run to Froth.

Hmmm...

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
The OP clearly stated Pre-Ragnarok, so your feat is INVALID.

There was no change to his physical stats in Ragnarok.

In any case Hes already fought Hulk without his hammer in Avengers.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
I remember.

I also remember it being clearly stated in the Black Panther movie that vibranium is the strongest metal in the UNIVERSE. Last time i checked, BP's suit was made of Vibranium.

So are you saying vocal statements made in a movie trump movie feats? Just let me know if this is how you want to debate because I can start using the same tactic.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander

I won't debate your misunderstandings. It's a known thing that you have a quality for bending feats, else the Depowered Thor vs Depowered T'Challa thread would be long time closed.

In short, proof has been shown that Thor actually has some decent hammerless feats but you don't want to admit you were wrong so you'll hide behind backhanded insults.