Black Panther & Killmonger vs Thor

Started by Inhuman15 pages

He probably thinks that Vibranium being the strongest metal around means that strong punches, strong impacts, etc, wont be felt by Black Panther.
Even though we seen BP be affected by blunt force. Like he was dazed after the rhino hit him. And this was even with the new kinetic energy suit.

Who gives a fuq if the suits wont be damaged or penetrated. T'Challas brain, body and bones will be messed up from Thors punches. Most likely killed with 1 good punch tbh.

^ Plus in this case, he can even use one of them as a weapon against the other. Ergo, he has his vibranium weapon right there.

Originally posted by Inhuman
He probably thinks that Vibranium being the strongest metal around means that strong punches, strong impacts, etc, wont be felt by Black Panther.
Even though we seen BP be affected by blunt force. Like he was dazed after the rhino hit him. And this was even with the new kinetic energy suit.

Who gives a fuq if the suits wont be damaged or penetrated. T'Challas brain, body and bones will be messed up from Thors punches. Most likely killed with 1 good punch tbh.

We can even dumb this down and use medieval weaponry as examples. A sharp scimitar can scratch and even leave gouges on a heavy wooden shield yet it would be completely ineffective against steel chain mail. But change your weapon to a heavy oak staff and you can pretty much break the bones of someone wearing chain mail yet be completely ineffective against a decent wooden shield.

Originally posted by FrothByte
We can even dumb this down and use medieval weaponry as examples. A sharp scimitar can scratch and even leave gouges on a heavy wooden shield yet it would be completely ineffective against steel chain mail. But change your weapon to a heavy oak staff and you can pretty much break the bones of someone wearing chain mail yet be completely ineffective against a decent wooden shield.

Let's dumb it down even further.
A person wearing the best bulletproof vest around would still be severely hurt with a point blank shot gun blast to the chest.
Now imagine a mask made out of the same bulletproof material and taking a shotgun blast point blank to the head.

Doesn't matter if none of the shotgun pellets penetrated the bullet-proof marital the person inside would be severely injured or dead.

Is this really such a hard concept to understand , Jesus.😬

Originally posted by Inhuman
He probably thinks that Vibranium being the strongest metal around means that strong punches, strong impacts, etc, wont be felt by Black Panther.
Even though we seen BP be affected by blunt force. Like he was dazed after the rhino hit him. And this was even with the new kinetic energy suit.

Who gives a fuq if the suits wont be damaged or penetrated. T'Challas brain, body and bones will be messed up from Thors punches. Most likely killed with 1 good punch tbh.

So does Vibranium not work like it does in the comics, or even within the very setting?

Because in the comics Vibranium totally works like that, and that seems to be how it worked in the movies considering that a hammer strike from Thor didn't seem to affect Cap at all.

Haven't seen Black Panther yet, but the inconsistency is interesting.

Originally posted by NemeBro
So does Vibranium not work like it does in the comics, or even within the very setting?

Because in the comics Vibranium totally works like that, and that seems to be how it worked in the movies considering that a hammer strike from Thor didn't seem to affect Cap at all.

Haven't seen Black Panther yet, but the inconsistency is interesting.

It does work like that to a degree but we see T'Challa being affected by blunt-force even though he is wearing the suit that absorbs kinetic energy.

Also reported for racism for not watching BP yet.barker

Originally posted by NemeBro
So does Vibranium not work like it does in the comics, or even within the very setting?

Because in the comics Vibranium totally works like that, and that seems to be how it worked in the movies considering that a hammer strike from Thor didn't seem to affect Cap at all.

Haven't seen Black Panther yet, but the inconsistency is interesting.

MCU vibranium does seem to absorb a bit of shock but it has it's limits. Even Cap's shield wasn't able to fully absorb Mjolnir's strike. Instead it redirected it in the form of a shockwave that leveled the surrounding area.

BP's suit can absorb the kinetic energy and charge up the suit but it still has it's limits. From what we can tell, it doesn't redirect the energy like Cap's shield does so whatever excess kinetic energy it can't absorb still gets transferred to the wearer. Which is why BP still gets hurt by excessive blunt trauma.

Originally posted by Inhuman
It does work like that to a degree but we see T'Challa being affected by blunt-force even though he is wearing the suit that absorbs kinetic energy.

Also reported for racism for not watching BP yet.barker

I'm boycotting the film because it promotes the toxic message that nlggers can accomplish anything yeah.

Ha

Originally posted by FrothByte
So are we debating using feats or statements? You can't have it both ways you know.

The claws are not what's being discussed since Thor isn't punching BP's claws, it's the suit that's getting hit. And BP could feel Cap's hits with his shield. Heck, BP was flinching from regular hits from Cap and Bucky, whereas Thor didn't even flinch when he got hit on the head with Cap's shield.

It took multiple hits from Cap's shield to damage IM's armor, and BP's suit has no feats of taking that many hits from Cap's shield or any other similar trauma.

Furthermore, Cap's shield was never dented by BP's claws. Scratched paint yes, dented, no.

Concession accepted, Thor ain't a better fighter than T'Challa 👆

Everything else you wrote is just trying to go around my words so i'll just ignore them.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Gosh Josh, are you seriously this dumb? You might want to double-check what you're saying before you make yourself even more of a fool.

Everyone knows that blunt trauma is different from slashing/piercing attacks.

You keep using the claws as some form of proof yet Thor doesn't have claws. He'll be punching and kicking and grappling, which means what you need to prove is BP's suit surviving greater blunt trauma than what IM's suit has encountered. Not whether it can get scratched or not.

Dammmmnnnnn Froth!!!!!

Like freaking seriously!!!?

1. Go research about Vibranium capabilites, if we are talking about which metal can take more blunt force then Vibranium wins automatically based on the sole role it plays in the MCU (Energy absorption).

2. You asked me for evidence that Vibranium suit > Gold Titanium is MORE DURABLE. Resisting cuts IS a feat of durability!

Trying to go around my words won't safe Thor from defeat if that's what you think.

Actually, nothing can, else i wouldn't be supporting the Panthers.

Originally posted by Inhuman
He probably thinks that Vibranium being the strongest metal around means that strong punches, strong impacts, etc, wont be felt by Black Panther.
Even though we seen BP be affected by blunt force. Like he was dazed after the rhino hit him. And this was even with the new kinetic energy suit.

Who gives a fuq if the suits wont be damaged or penetrated. T'Challas brain, body and bones will be messed up from Thors punches. Most likely killed with 1 good punch tbh.

again,

INFORM YOURSELF BOY!

I doubt you even know what Vibranium is.

Thor wins 10/10. he's just way too strong and durable.

Originally posted by FrothByte
We can even dumb this down and use medieval weaponry as examples. A sharp scimitar can scratch and even leave gouges on a heavy wooden shield yet it would be completely ineffective against steel chain mail. But change your weapon to a heavy oak staff and you can pretty much break the bones of someone wearing chain mail yet be completely ineffective against a decent wooden shield.

Totally irrelevant!

We aren't comparing two different objects, we are comparing suits. To bring such an argument you need evidence that the objects being compared are different.

E.G. A shield ain't a knife, therefore Cap's shield won't cut as effectively as Vibranium Claws, therefore your dear Thor gets butchered

^^^^^^^

That's valid use of evidence and comparisons. 👆

Originally posted by Silent Master
Thor wins 10/10. he's just way too strong and durable.

Thor's cuck maybe. 😂

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Thor's cuck maybe. 😂

Your preferences aside. Thor still wins

Originally posted by Silent Master
Your preferences aside. Thor still wins

Well, you are the one speaking things unseen in the movies....... Clearly you know the lad well. 👆

😂 😂

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Well, you are the one speaking things unseen in the movies....... Clearly you know the lad well. 👆

😂 😂

Everything I've said is backed up by the movies and you know this. which is why you ran away from our BZ.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Totally irrelevant!

We aren't comparing two different objects, we are comparing suits. To bring such an argument you need evidence that the objects being compared are different.

E.G. A shield ain't a knife, therefore Cap's shield won't cut as effectively as Vibranium Claws, therefore your [B] dear Thor gets butchered

^^^^^^^

That's valid use of evidence and comparisons. 👆 [/B]

Following your logic: A suit ain't a shield, therefore BP's suit won't block hits as effectively as Cap's shield.

Stuck your foot in your mouth didn't ya?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Everything I've said is backed up by the movies and you know this. which is why you ran away from our BZ.

Actually it's all the opposite.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Actually it's all the opposite.

So you ran away because my arguments weren't backed by the movie, do you realize how retarded your logic is?