Darth Tyranus (Kurk) v. Darth Tenebrous (Jack)

Jack has yielded before the battle even started. Anyone who wants to finish this either here or on comicvine say so.

A wise decision. A featless sap like Tenebrous has no claim to victory against Tyranus.

No matter how much stronger than Bane Banite scailing says he should be, he has nothing.

sorry, but disagree, no sith is featless, they just have no KNOWN feats.

*scaling

Originally posted by victreebelvictr
sorry, but disagree, no sith is featless, they just have no KNOWN feats.

Originally posted by Geistalt
No matter how much stronger than Bane Banite scailing says he should be, he has nothing.

"'Tenebrous is featless' is the war cry of the 80 IQ people." - ILS

I agree. Have a little education, 80 IQ person:

https://comicvine.gamespot.com/profile/azronger/blog/darth-tenebrous-respect-thread-updated/133232/

thank you master, i know he had amazing feats, an i am surely more than 80 IQ. great evidence and page.

You learn well, my apprentice. Crush the Tenebrous deniers.

The fun fact is that Azronger's Darth Tenebrous Respect Thread is more assumption than facts.

I stand corrected; he does have feats. They're still a far cry from proving that he's superior to the likes of Tyranus and Vader.

Originally posted by Geistalt
I stand corrected; he does have feats. They're still a far cry from proving that he's superior to the likes of Tyranus and Vader.

Azronger's argument is that Masters sought apprentices more powerful in the Force than them. That is asinine because the Banite Sith sought capable apprentices who had talent for cunning and dexterity.

that is the point of ancient sith, assuming. 98% of it was correct and not even assumed, why dont you reread that.