Parkland Kids

Started by SquallX7 pages
Originally posted by Robtard
Would it be possible for you Trumpers to make a single 'this is why David Hogg triggers me' thread and keep your conniption fits over Hogg in there? Would keep KMC tidier and more on thread topic. Thanks in advance.

Are you kidding me!?

See, this is what I meant. And lo and behold someone is interchanging truth and lies because the opposition falls across from him.

I post a video of the kid saying he was not at the school when the shootthey by began, but instead of trying to find the truth, your here calling people trumpers and saying Hogg triggers them!?

Really!? This is your stance!?

Originally posted by SquallX
Are you kidding me!?

See, this is what I meant. And lo and behold someone is interchanging truth and lies because the opposition falls across from him.

I post a video of the kid saying he was not at the school when the shootthey by began, but instead of trying to find the truth, your here calling people trumpers and saying Hogg triggers them!?

Really!? This is your stance!?

Nothing you said has anything to do with what I commented on, raging-guy. I told you before, I understand that shitting on David Hogg is the new Trumper thing to do and I don't care; go for it all you want; shit on the kid all you want.

What I politely asked is if you people could keep all the shitting on David Hogg to a single thread. Having a new thread whenever Hogg says/does something new which sets you off is messy. Remember when TI would make nine Clinton threads a day during the election; it got messy.

Originally posted by SquallX
Are you kidding me!?

See, this is what I meant. And lo and behold someone is interchanging truth and lies because the opposition falls across from him.

I post a video of the kid saying he was not at the school when the shootthey by began, but instead of trying to find the truth, your here calling people trumpers and saying Hogg triggers them!?

Really!? This is your stance!?

You have to realize that I'm pretty sure at first Rob was praising these students and calling them intelligent, etc. Now his face is red because they have shown the very opposite of that is true. It's why he gets triggered seeing them called out.

Originally posted by Surtur
You have to realize that I'm pretty sure at first Rob was praising these students and calling them intelligent, etc. Now his face is red because they have shown the very opposite of that is true. It's why he gets triggered seeing them called out.

^ another pretend win for the big boy.

I do agree an overall thread would be nice. Not for David Hogg specifically, he isn't the only student saying dumb shit. He certainly wasn't the one tweeting "the 2nd amendment has no restrictions".

The name of the thread should be "Kids Say The Dumbest Things".

Originally posted by Surtur
I do agree an overall thread would be nice.

Go on and make it then, you might want to add "Parkland" or the name of the movement to the title to make it clear though.

Originally posted by Robtard
Go on and make it then, you might want to add "Parkland" or the name of the movement to the title to make it clear though.

Not needed. It just so happens we have a perfectly good thread right here...with no title as well.

Backfire, you know what to do: Parkland Kids Say The Dumbest Things

The title is funny cuz it's true.

Changed title, we can try to use this thread to discuss the Parkland kids or whatever. Thought I'm not convinced we need essentially three threads on what amounts to Gun control debate. May close this thread if it gets too redundant with the other gun threads.

Originally posted by BackFire
Changed title, we can try to use this thread to discuss the Parkland kids or whatever. Thought I'm not convinced we need essentially three threads on what amounts to Gun control debate. May close this thread if it gets too redundant with the other gun threads.

Where is the part about them saying dumb things?

In your post.

Originally posted by BackFire
In your post.

And why not include it in the title?

Why would I?

Originally posted by BackFire
Why would I?

Why wouldn't you? It's an apt description of the thread. You were all about those with the triggered thread lol.

Fair enough on adding a name to this thread. Lolz, that you didn't get your smear wish. Try not to let it ruin your week again, Surt. Anyhow.

Topic: Frank Stallone apologizes for profanity-laced tweet directed toward Parkland shooting survivor

LoLz @ Trumpers. What a retard.

It's what you want the thread to be called. What you desire to name a thread is none of my concern.

Originally posted by BackFire
It's what you want the thread to be called. What you desire to name a thread is none of my concern.

Neat, and if I said why not close this thread so we can start fresh, and made the topic with my title, what would occur?

Since you are not a mod your opinion would be noted and ignored. There is no reason to close this thread and create a new one that is for all intents and purposes identical so you can arbitrarily change the title to fit your agenda. As it is, the title is fair and reasonable, as I'm sure the debate within the thread will be.

Originally posted by BackFire
Since you are not a mod your opinion would be noted and ignored. There is no reason to close this thread and create a new one that is for all intents and purposes identical so you can arbitrarily change the title to fit your agenda. As it is, the title is fair and reasonable, as I'm sure the debate within the thread will be.

Lol, I just see hypocrisy, that's all.

I'm sorry you're not getting your way. I'm sure if you pretend to laugh about it more it will make your argument seem stronger.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You can't quote him because he's using the wrong type of apostrophe. you'll notice that your and my apostrophe is straight and his is angled.

Right, I am aware, which is why I asked if he's using mobile.