Parkland Kids

Started by Surtur7 pages
Originally posted by BackFire
I'm sorry you're not getting your way. I'm sure if you pretend to laugh about it more it will make your argument seem stronger.

I don't need to get my way, I knew you wouldn't actually do it. Your hypocrisy exposed is enough lol.

Go ahead and explain my hypocrisy.

^ Wow. Surt's tantrums. Anyhow.

Topic: Emma González Conspiracy Theory Debunked: Parkland Student Did Not Admit to Bullying Nikolas Cruz

LoLz at these anti Parkland survivors retards and their clownshow conspiracy theories. They can't attack the kids with facts, so they make up BS. What retards.

Originally posted by BackFire
Go ahead and explain my hypocrisy.

At this point it doesn't matter. It's not like this ends with you admitting it lol.

Speaking of such things though:

David Hogg swears he’s not a bully and won’t appear on Laura Ingraham’s show despite her invitation

If he thinks he isn't a bully I wonder how he defines it.

Originally posted by Robtard
^ Wow. Surt's tantrums. Anyhow.

Topic: Emma González Conspiracy Theory Debunked: Parkland Student Did Not Admit to Bullying Nikolas Cruz

LoLz at these anti Parkland survivors retards and their clownshow conspiracy theories. They can't attack the kids with facts, so they make up BS. What retards.

Indeed I hate it and it's so pointless. There is plenty of legit things to go after with her. This little einstein said it's harder to make plans on the weekend with friends than it is to buy a gun.

No, it does matter. You made the claim, back it up.

Originally posted by BackFire
No, it does matter. You made the claim, back it up.

No, it really doesn't. It will spawn a multi page debate that solves nothing.

Originally posted by Surtur
No, it really doesn't. It will spawn a multi page debate that solves nothing.

Then why bring it up if you can't defend it?

I've grown tired of your baby games. Show convincing evidence of my hypocrisy or you will be banned permanently and you will not be allowed to come back. PM it to me if you like.

Originally posted by BackFire
Then why bring it up if you can't defend it?

I've grown tired of your baby games. Show convincing evidence of my hypocrisy or you will be banned permanently and you will not be allowed to come back. PM it to me if you like.

LOL just to be clear, you are actually going to try to compel a poster to explain something to you that has zero to do with the thread? All because your hypocritical bullshit got called out?

Originally posted by Surtur
LOL just to be clear, you are actually going to try to compel a poster to explain something to you that has zero to do with the thread? All because your hypocritical bullshit got called out?

Hence why I said feel free to PM me.

Go on. Let's see the evidence. If you are so convinced of it, then surely it must exist.

Originally posted by Surtur
Indeed I hate it and it's so pointless. There is plenty of legit things to go after with her. This little einstein said it's harder to make plans on the weekend with friends than it is to buy a gun.

Do you not understand hyperbole. Her point wasn't literal; it was a mild exaggeration to demonstrate that is is very easy/simple to buy a gun in the US.

eg You could walk into a Walmart and leave with a gun in a matter of minutes.

eg My friend's wife (Oregon native) purchased some kind of CZ Scorpion for her brother-in-law (he lives in Ca) same day. He wrote her a check, she deposited it and then purchased the gun using her DL.

Originally posted by Robtard
Do you not understand hyperbole. Her point wasn't literal; it was a mild exaggeration to demonstrate that is is very easy/simple to buy a gun in the US.

eg You could walk into a Walmart and leave with a gun in a matter of minutes.

eg My friend's wife (Oregon native) purchased some kind of CZ Scorpion for her brother-in-law (he lives in Ca) same day. He wrote her a check, she deposited it and then purchased the gun using her DL.

Nah, f*ck that. You can't whine about every little detail conservatives get wrong and then not care about these misleading statements.

What she said is so far from the truth it isn't even funny.

Originally posted by Surtur
Nah, f*ck that. You can't whine about every little detail conservatives get wrong and then not care about these misleading statements.

Sorry if facts don't gel with your special reality. But it's absolutely true, it's very easy to purchase a gun in the US.

Originally posted by Robtard
Sorry if facts don't gel with your special reality. But it's absolutely true, it's very easy to purchase a gun in the US.

But they aren't facts. You said it was a "mild" exaggeration.

No, it wasn't a mild exaggeration. This is a fact, it will not be debated.

Her point was to say that it's very easy to buy a gun in the US. Her point is correct; I even gave two examples.

Originally posted by Robtard
Her point was to say that it's very easy to buy a gun in the US. Her point is correct; I even gave two examples.

Lol you are saying a person can walk into Walmart and just get a gun with no background check, nada?

Believe one only need a Driver's License or State ID to buy a rifle and/or shotgun at a Walmart, like alcohol and tobacco. I don't think Walmart carries handguns.

Originally posted by Robtard
Believe one only need a Driver's License or State ID to buy a rifle and/or shotgun at a Walmart, like alcohol and tobacco. I don't think Walmart carries handguns.

Seems like you aren't sure.

https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-requirements-to-buy-a-gun-from-Walmart

That site at least says they do a background check.

Case in point. Cruz seems to have purchased his AR-15 type same day via "instant background check", which seems like it's very easy to buy a gun in the US. Which was her point.

The gun, a Smith & Wesson M&P 15 .223, was purchased at Sunrise Tactical Supply, according to the Associated Press. Federal law allows people 18 and older to legally purchase long guns, including this kind of assault weapon. With no criminal record, Cruz cleared an instant background check via the FBI criminal database. -snip

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2018/02/15/florida-shooting-suspect-bought-gun-legally-authorities-say/340606002/

Originally posted by Robtard
Case in point. Cruz seems to have purchased his AR-15 type same day via "instant background check", which seems like it's very easy to buy a gun in the US. Which was her point.

The gun, a Smith & Wesson M&P 15 .223, was purchased at Sunrise Tactical Supply, according to the Associated Press. Federal law allows people 18 and older to legally purchase long guns, including this kind of assault weapon. With no criminal record, Cruz cleared an instant background check via the FBI criminal database. -snip

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2018/02/15/florida-shooting-suspect-bought-gun-legally-authorities-say/340606002/

There was a background check done and he passed. You can certainly say we need to tighten the system.

But we still end up with: what she said was nowhere near a "mild" exaggeration.

And she is not the only student to make strange gun claims. See the "there are restrictions on the 1st amendment, but not the second" comment.

And the other example you gave is a private transaction. That is your "gun show" loophole(has nothing to do with gun shows, but private sales). The problem is I don't know exactly how you stop such transactions from happening. All we could really do is make steeper penalties for people who sell a gun in a private transaction that is later used to shoot someone.