IW Thor vs Superman

Fight takes place in the forest where the Avengers fought Thanos, Thor has stormbreaker. Who wins?

Superman has speed equivalent to the Flash.

Win via speed blitz and flying.

I don't see how Superman hurts him but I don't see Thor tagging Superman very often. Stalemate imo

Originally posted by steverules_2
Fight takes place in the forest where the Avengers fought Thanos, Thor has stormbreaker. Who wins?

I thought the movie comes out tomorrow.

Also wow thanks for spoiling the fact that a forest appears in the movie. SMH

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
I don't see how Superman hurts him

The same way Hulk has hurt him probably.

How powerful is Stormbreaker?

It's powerful enough that

Spoiler:
Thor threw it at thanos and though Thanos tried to use the gauntlet to stop it, it still impaled him

Originally posted by Surtur
I thought the movie comes out tomorrow.

Also wow thanks for spoiling the fact that a forest appears in the movie. SMH

There's no point you seeing the movie now

Superman's speed is his only hope. if Thor connects, Superman dies. Superman should be too fast for Thor to hit based on JL but Thor's a walking lightning storm. Just getting in close would be difficult to Thor if he's powered up. 50/50 on this. The speed would have been too much and given Superman the clear edge if it wasn't for Thor's durability.

Spoiler:
Thor survived the heat/energy of a Star's CORE when he held open the gate. Crazy..

After that, the Bifrost, Sokovia, and Hulk's pounding in Ragnarok, Thor in lightning God mode is almost impossible to put down imo and definitely has ridiculous durability.

I hope we get to see Thor use his teleportation strategically in the next movie. That's a really OP power set, being able to use the power of the bifrost now.

So superman w/o his speed would lose

Well...Supermans speed is part of his power set. It's not like it's cheating.

He could dodge Thor and lay out 5 haymakers before Thor moves...trouble is, I don't think that's enough, even with Superman's strength, to knock Thor out. Not a fully powered Thor after Ragnarok and IW. He ate like a dozen haymakers from the Hulk without a scratch. Full ground and pounds. That's the only reason imo Superman doesn't just end it in moments.

The durability of Thor and damage soak is pretty bad ass

Superman is faster and nothing save for Kryptonite has been shown to be able to kill him thus far. Having said that the storm breaker feat is pretty OP so Thor has a good chance at being able to at least KO the big guy... if he can catch him that is

And other equally powerful Kryptonians, and objects used as weapons but those Kryptonians....

Stormbreaker would do to Clark what a giant axe swung by a person would do to a regular human imo.

I don't think Thor's durability feats prove that Superman can't rock the living hell out of him with a single punch.

And why should Thanos with IG be more durable than say Hulk (let alone Superman)? We need to see feats. We need to see the movie to analyze the exact details of all relevant information. We need to see EXACTLY HOW Thor hurts Thanos.

Superman's durability feats are great enough to say that Thor (pre movie) isn't doing much to him with hammer strikes. But we will see soon.

Will see after tonight

Couple hours for me. Should be good in here.

Originally posted by h1a8
I don't think Thor's durability feats prove that Superman can't rock the living hell out of him with a single punch.

And why should Thanos with IG be more durable than say Hulk (let alone Superman)? We need to see feats. We need to see the movie to analyze the exact details of all relevant information. We need to see EXACTLY HOW Thor hurts Thanos.

Superman's durability feats are great enough to say that Thor (pre movie) isn't doing much to him with hammer strikes. But we will see soon.

Because he is lol

yeah without spoiling details Thors damage output and durability have gone up drastically, hes a much better match for Superman now id say this fight is a 55/45 for Thor at this point

Originally posted by h1a8
I don't think Thor's durability feats prove that Superman can't rock the living hell out of him with a single punch.

And why should Thanos with IG be more durable than say Hulk (let alone Superman)? We need to see feats. We need to see the movie to analyze the exact details of all relevant information. We need to see EXACTLY HOW Thor hurts Thanos.

Superman's durability feats are great enough to say that Thor (pre movie) isn't doing much to him with hammer strikes. But we will see soon.

Why are you even commenting in here if you haven't seen IW and probably haven't seen Ragnarok either besides YouTube clips?

I think Clark's speed is the main deal breaker. If Thor can manage to land a hit with Stormbreaker I can see him pulling a Doomsday, but Clark is still massively faster and would beat him up with his punches

So Clark for a majority still