IW Thor vs Superman

Started by Putinbot169 pages

Thanos is nowhere near as Durable as Supes.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Oh yeah I completely forgot about the Nuke in BvS!

Thors durability is truly > Supermans.

Did you even read what I posted above? A nuke is much hotter than a star and it had a the force of the blast as well.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Thanos is nowhere near as Durable as Supes.

😂 😂 😂

Originally posted by Psychotron
Did you even read what I posted above? A nuke is much hotter than a star and it had a the force of the blast as well.

Depends on the star.

Also, Superman got obliterated and K.O'd entirely.

Thor had just 3rd degree burns and was partially K.Od. Can't really compare the feats.

Originally posted by Psychotron
Enough of this star heat wanking nonsense. He didn't tank it, he took it for a few seconds and passed out. In fact, he was dying until he got Stormbreaker. The dwarf said so himself. A star like our Sun has a surface temperature of around 5000° Celsius and a core temperature of 15,000,000° Celsius. We don't know how much Thor got hit with, but it's in that range and it nearly killed him.

Now just for comparison, Superman survived a nuke at point blank range, though he was badly injured. A nuclear blast burns with 100,000,000° Celsius. And this is without factoring in the insane kinetic energy of the blast itself.

Etri specifically said that Thor would be taking the FULL FORCE of a Star's energy. It's core in particular, Etri also said it would take a few minutes if not more.

Just reminding you of some facts. So, in conclusion, Thor withstood the full force of a Star's core, in a CONCETRATED beam for minutes.

The initial centre of a Nuclear Explosion burns hotter briefly but it is not even remotely comparable to the power a Star generates every second it burns, much less for minutes.

Thor suffered damage but was conscious and instantly healed with Stormbreaker.

It wasn't minutes, Rage. You know very well I can time it.

Besides, not only is the core far less hot, it also doesn't have the blast force of a nuke.

Thor was literally dying, which was confirmed by characters in the movie. He didn't tank it.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Depends on the star.

Also, Superman got obliterated and K.O'd entirely.

Thor had just 3rd degree burns and was partially K.Od. Can't really compare the feats.

Watch the movie again. Superman was KO'd, Thor was dying.

Originally posted by Psychotron
Watch the movie again. Superman was KO'd, Thor was dying.

WTH! If it werent for the Sun Superman would be dead dude.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Etri specifically said that Thor would be taking the FULL FORCE of a Star's energy. It's core in particular, Etri also said it would take a few minutes if not more.

Just reminding you of some facts. So, in conclusion, Thor withstood the full force of a Star's core, in a CONCETRATED beam for minutes.

The initial centre of a Nuclear Explosion burns hotter briefly but it is not even remotely comparable to the power a Star generates every second it burns, much less for minutes.

Thor suffered damage but was conscious and instantly healed with Stormbreaker.


The star was a dwarf.

Let's ignore that Thors clothes were not disintegrated.
Thor only experienced a fraction of the heat since most of it went around Thor to heat the metal.

And it took a few seconds. Not minutes. Unless you believe that movie time should be inflated in that scene (I'll be ok with that).

Also Etri could possibly be using hyperbole in stating Full Force of a star.

It's a good feat showing Thor resistance to heat.

Originally posted by h1a8
The star was a dwarf.

Let's ignore that Thors clothes were not disintegrated.
Thor only experienced a fraction of the heat since most of it went around Thor to heat the metal.

And it took a few seconds. Not minutes. Unless you believe that movie time should be inflated in that scene (I'll be ok with that).

Also Etri could possibly be using hyperbole in stating Full Force of a star.

It's a good feat showing Thor resistance to heat.

Where is it stated it was a Dwarf Star?

Thor clothes aint normal clothes dude. A

Thats is an assumption.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Where is it stated it was a Dwarf Star?

Thor clothes aint normal clothes dude. A

Thats is an assumption.

It was shown extremely small and stated to be a dead star. Dead stars are planet size.

I ignored the clothes not being disintegrated, even if there were regular human clothes.

It was a good feat for Thor. He was dying and Stormbreaker saved him however. Same with Supes and the nuke. The sun saved him. I hope everyone can cut the lowballing.

Superman's speed is still too great. He could disarm Thor and hit him with stormbreaker before he could react.

superman does not need to reach light speeds in earth's atmosphere, bcos he will cause serious damage to his environment, given that he unlike flash does not have a protective aura around him. And he hasnt had to travel in space, as to calculate his real speed. In the comics though he traveled FTL many times.

Originally posted by h1a8
It was shown extremely small and stated to be a dead star. Dead stars are planet size.

I ignored the clothes not being disintegrated, even if there were regular human clothes.

Just because it's small doesnt mean it is a "small star". We also see that the star is coated with some sort of metal structure. The stsr could very weel be compressed by some mechanism in order to concentrate the energies from it.

Just cause its dying doesnt make it weaker.

Originally posted by $on OF krypton
superman does not need to reach light speeds in earth's atmosphere, bcos he will cause serious damage to his environment, given that he unlike flash does not have a protective aura around him. And he hasnt had to travel in space, as to calculate his real speed. In the comics though he traveled FTL many times.

Is that evidence? Do you have evidence?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
WTH! If it werent for the Sun Superman would be dead dude.

So do you intend blowing the sun away!!???! The sun would always be there just as stormbreaker or possibly something will SURELY have been used to revive thor.... The "if it werent for the sun" excuse does not hold water.

Originally posted by $on OF krypton
So do you intend blowing the sun away!!???! The sun would always be there just as stormbreaker or possibly something will SURELY have been used to revive thor.... The "if it werent for the sun" excuse does not hold water.

Naah it will be night time or a dark panorama, as in all DC fights 😂

Naah, Stormbreaker would kill him faster than the sun can kill him.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Etri specifically said that Thor would be taking the FULL FORCE of a Star's energy. It's core in particular, Etri also said it would take a few minutes if not more.

Just reminding you of some facts. So, in conclusion, Thor withstood the full force of a Star's core, in a CONCETRATED beam for minutes.

The initial centre of a Nuclear Explosion burns hotter briefly but it is not even remotely comparable to the power a Star generates every second it burns, much less for minutes.

Thor suffered damage but was conscious and instantly healed with Stormbreaker.

Context only matters when it helps their side.

Lightning isn't lightspeed, and even Diana can handily react to and avoid lightning. The same Diana who is literally a statue to Clark.