Originally posted by Rage.Of.OlympusSpoiler:
Okay?And you're transferring comic Superman's feats to the movie version. I wouldn't be shocked if he was able to, but there is no indication that he can withstand the full force of a Sun's core, much less be amped by it. Maybe he could. He has never faced something quite as powerful as the nuclear furnace of a Star's core. Based on the available evidence, it'd be easier to argue he couldn't rather than could. I would've said Thor shouldn't have a chance in hell either but here we are, so I'm not completely against it. As it stands, purely on durability feats, Superman could blast Thor with heat vision and it should be as useless as Iron Man's repulsors.
Bleeding Edge Iron Man is an entirely different level from previous armors. If I made a list of what has stunned or even temporarily knocked out Superman, it would be a lot less than BE Stark. So I don't see how mentioning Iron Man is even relevant as he was completely insignificant compared to Thor's damage.
I dk what you're referring to by the Gamora stuff. She did nothing and tried stabbing herself. Maybe I missed it.
I'm not understanding your argument here. Are you saying Superman would tank Stormbreaker or??? Based on the current available evidence, if he gets hit, game over.
Speed and Strength favor Superman. Durability? Thor has impressive feats as does Superman. Thor is more versatile as he is a better fighter and has weapons that AMP. Thor without Weapons gets stomped. Thor with his weapons has a shot but probably loses as he still would be a Statue to Superman and so would the hammer/axe if thrown.
Yes he tanked the heat. Read what you wrote? The heat of a Star! He almost died while doing so if SB wasn’t given to him.
Clark while depowered survived and over powered the World engine. Fast enough to escape the pull of a singularly.
Thor stock went up, but those feats were MOS Clark.
Now Clark also has his new found speed, and freeze breath for Thor to contend with.