IW Thor vs Superman

Started by cdtm69 pages

Superman wins, with ease.

And now, to read the op.

Originally posted by h1a8
1. Superman >>>>>Those two in durability. It's not clear how lightning effects Superman.

2. What logic has someone not being able to punch at full strength at full speed? Wouldn't punching harder require punching faster?

Neither Zod, Faora or Namek have ever matched the destructive force of Thor's Jotunheim blast or how his lightning one-shot multiple leviathans yet the kryptonian attacks were hurting Superman. Which means Thor's lightning can hurt Superman.

Also, Thor's lightning is obviously >>> regular lightning.

Thor destroys Superman these days. I always knew this to be the case but now you other slower kids are starting to catch on.

Originally posted by h1a8

2. What logic has someone not being able to punch at full strength at full speed? Wouldn't punching harder require punching faster?

Perhaps it would be too taxing to use his full strength at those speeds.

Perhaps he cant operate at those speeds for very long.

Who knows? Superior Feats are required.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thor destroys Superman these days. I always knew this to be the case but now you other slower kids are starting to catch on.

Exactly my words. I always knew Thor was more powerful than Hulk.

You were damn slow catching on.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Perhaps it would be too taxing to use his full strength at those speeds.

Perhaps he cant operate at those speeds for very long.

Who knows? Superior Feats are required.

h1 hasn't seen the movie, so he doesn't know that while fighting the Flash, Superman's superspeed punches barely damaged the monument they were fighting around.

Originally posted by Silent Master
h1 hasn't seen the movie,

Lucky him.

No comic book movie will ever be as bad as the F4 2015 film

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bAWWmLfkWo

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Exactly my words. I always knew Thor was more powerful than Hulk.

You were damn slow catching on.

Physically Hulk has always been his superior. He does not have energy projection to Thor gets that nod due to that. He also has skill, determination, etc. the powerhouse has always been the Hulk. We see this film confirm that in the opening moments.

As I’ve always said Thanos is the greatest villain of all time. This film is the best of all time. Thanos truly stands alone and atop the mountain.

Originally posted by Silent Master
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bAWWmLfkWo

Never watched Steel

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Perhaps it would be too taxing to use his full strength at those speeds.

Perhaps he cant operate at those speeds for very long.

Who knows? Superior Feats are required.


To punch harder you must punch FASTER.
It’s all about change in momentum over change in time.

In Superman’s eyes he’s not punching quickly but slowly with a lot of power. In someone else’s eyes, Superman is punching extremely fast.

I get what you are saying though. Bracing power does play a role though. How much bracing power (resistance of being moved backwards) will Superman put behind the punch? For example, an escalator can push/ brace with a large force without moving fast. Bracing power can act as mass. For example, an unstoppable object (infinite bracing power) will hit something as if it was infinite mass (infinite force). So it makes sense that Juggs hit hard although punches slower than Spider-Man.

^ Wrong. Speed is not the only thing that powers a punch. Otherwise lightweights would be punching way stronger than heavyweights.

A jab is the fastest punch a boxer delivers but is nowhere near as strong as a cross.

H1 is so damn stupid.

H1 doesn't understand how real life or movies work

Originally posted by h1a8

To punch harder you must punch FASTER.
It’s all about change in momentum over change in time.

Punching power is all about technique, and body mechanics. You ninny.

Originally posted by FrothByte
^ Wrong. Speed is not the only thing that powers a punch. Otherwise lightweights would be punching way stronger than heavyweights.

A jab is the fastest punch a boxer delivers but is nowhere near as strong as a cross.

Reread my post. This time all of it and not some of it. The cross is thrown over a longer distance and thus appears a little slower.

Also some boxers throw the cross faster than their jab.

Originally posted by Khazra Reborn
Punching power is all about technique, and body mechanics. You ninny.

Duh
I'm talking about keeping everything constant. Will doing the same punch with same mechanics produce more power than doing it with faster motion?
Common sense says no.

So what you're saying is that guys like Bane and Baleman have crappy power as they have poor technique and are very slow.

Originally posted by h1a8
Reread my post. This time all of it and not some of it. The cross is thrown over a longer distance and thus appears a little slower.

Also some boxers throw the cross faster than their jab.

Ah h1, your stupidity never ceases to amaze. A cross is slower because it utilizes more muscles and has the boxer's weight behind it, whereas a jab is mostly a snapping of the fist forward (it's slightlt more complex than that but let's not get into that).

That's why the jab is faster.