Originally posted by h1a8
And you presented no proof that Thor is resistant against aircraft bullets.
He survived the Asgardian ship explosion.
Aircraft bullets could not blow that ship up. They do not have the force.
Thor has better feats, which have been presented to you countless times but they are pointless to bring up because you Troll around them, and ignore what you do not like.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
He survived the Asgardian ship explosion.Aircraft bullets could not blow that ship up. They do not have the force.
Thor has better feats, which have been presented to you countless times but they are pointless to bring up because you Troll around them, and ignore what you do not like.
Also, I vaguely remember the scene. Can you post it?
"Thor has better feats" is an opinion. I want to see facts. Why are they better feats? Prove it. Give me some approximate level of forces we are dealing with. Back it up with some sort of science. Otherwise, you are just guessing.
Originally posted by h1a8
What? Aircraft bullets aren't bombs. They penetrate. Why couldn't an aircraft bullet penetrate the ship?
Do you think an aircraft bullet has this much Force:
At 3:22.
Have you even seen the film?
You want me to provide calculations that explosion is > a few aircraft bullets.
Are you f***ing retarded or something?
Do you also need calculations to know that Mike Tyson hits harder than a 10 year old?
We saw Hulk tank aircraft bullets. Did those bullets destroy the Hellocarrier? Or even a chunk off the Hellicarrier? Use your brain for once.
Do you have any common sense at all? Do you have a functioning brain even?
You do understand that explosions send out fragmentation that penetrates like a bullet. I have personally seen frag wounds go straight through a man, similar to a bullet. The only real difference is the barreling,rifling and usually the round itself.
Will a frag from a standard issue grenade go as far as a round from a rifle? No. But I imagine a tiny piece of metal powered by something like, say the sokovia explosion would.
Ok, let's hash out the details here.
Reasons to think Thor can tank aircraft bullets:
1. He survived the full force of a neutron star for a few minutes.
2. He took a point-blank repulsor blast to the face without even a red mark on his face.
3. He survived the Bifrost and Sokovia explosions without a scratch.
4. He's proven tougher than IM who is legitimately bulletproof
5. He's proven tougher than Loki is has onscreen feats of being bulletproof and taking an exploding arrow to the face without issue.
6. He's taken repeated hits to the face from Hulk without a scratch.
7. No Asgardian has been harmed by a human-made weapon yet, not even a lowly farmer.
8. There are scenes of Thor being in the line of fire from jet planes (both in Avengers and AOU) and again he left unscathed.
9. He's fallen from hundreds of feet without any injury.
Reasons to think aircraft bullets can actually harm Thor:
1. h1's made-up math
Originally posted by FrothByte
Ok, let's hash out the details here.Reasons to think Thor can tank aircraft bullets:
1. He survived the full force of a neutron star for a few minutes.
2. He took a point-blank repulsor blast to the face without even a red mark on his face.
3. He survived the Bifrost and Sokovia explosions without a scratch.
4. He's proven tougher than IM who is legitimately bulletproof
5. He's proven tougher than Loki is has onscreen feats of being bulletproof and taking an exploding arrow to the face without issue.
6. He's taken repeated hits to the face from Hulk without a scratch.
7. No Asgardian has been harmed by a human-made weapon yet, not even a lowly farmer.
8. There are scenes of Thor being in the line of fire from jet planes (both in Avengers and AOU) and again he left unscathed.
9. He's fallen from hundreds of feet without any injury.Reasons to think aircraft bullets can actually harm Thor:
1. h1's made-up math
h1 will lie and claim those feats are inferior to aircraft bullets.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Ok, let's hash out the details here.Reasons to think Thor can tank aircraft bullets:
1. He survived the full force of a neutron star for a few minutes.
2. He took a point-blank repulsor blast to the face without even a red mark on his face.
3. He survived the Bifrost and Sokovia explosions without a scratch.
4. He's proven tougher than IM who is legitimately bulletproof
5. He's proven tougher than Loki is has onscreen feats of being bulletproof and taking an exploding arrow to the face without issue.
6. He's taken repeated hits to the face from Hulk without a scratch.
7. No Asgardian has been harmed by a human-made weapon yet, not even a lowly farmer.
8. There are scenes of Thor being in the line of fire from jet planes (both in Avengers and AOU) and again he left unscathed.
9. He's fallen from hundreds of feet without any injury.Reasons to think aircraft bullets can actually harm Thor:
1. h1's made-up math
1. The force wasn't that great as proven by Thor's acceleration
2. Repulser blast <<<aircraft bullets
3. Bifrost <<aircraft bullets and
Sokovia is unknown where Thor was
And still < aircraft bullets.
4. IM had bullet holes per the movie.
5. Aircraft bullets >>>>>>>>>regular bullets
6. The hits were <<<<aircraft bullets judging on how far he hit Thor away.
7. Irrelevant.
8. Didn't see Thor get hit
9. Less than aircraft bullets and people have survive this stuff.
Originally posted by h1a8
1. The force wasn't that great as proven by Thor's acceleration
2. Repulser blast <<<aircraft bullets
3. Bifrost <<aircraft bullets and
Sokovia is unknown where Thor was
And still < aircraft bullets.
4. IM had bullet holes per the movie.
5. Aircraft bullets >>>>>>>>>regular bullets
6. The hits were <<<<aircraft bullets judging on how far he hit Thor away.
7. Irrelevant.
8. Didn't see Thor get hit
9. Less than aircraft bullets and people have survive this stuff.
All you did was spout your opinions on why you think my arguments were wrong but you never really provided any proof that aircraft bullets can pierce Thor.
Originally posted by FrothByteOpinions? Isn't that what you are doing? You listed superior feats IN YOUR OPINION.
All you did was spout your opinions on why you think my arguments were wrong but you never really provided any proof that aircraft bullets can pierce Thor.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Your trolling is obvious, you want someone to answer yes so you can call it a claim and then demand proof. The fact is, you made the original claim and therefore the burden of proof is on you.
They claim that the feats are superior. I gave a feat by the bullets. It's on them to prove the superiority.