IW Thor vs Superman

Originally posted by Nibedicus
You mean the same 30mm rounds Superman ran away from in MoS?

Funny you were arguing 20mm for pages and now suddenly it's 30mm, amirite?

Superman, too, apparently. Since Superman ran away from a 30mm round, right (following your logic, that is)?

Here your claim

Originally posted by h1a8
Then prove that they are not.
Bran posted proof that such bullets CAN penetrate 3 inch thick titanium.

Prove it.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Superman, too, apparently. Since Superman ran away from a 30mm round, right (following your logic, that is)?

Oh... you got him there. Probably why he ignored it.

Originally posted by h1a8
Opinions? Isn't that what you are doing? You listed superior feats IN YOUR OPINION.

They claim that the feats are superior. I gave a feat by the bullets. It's on them to prove the superiority.

No, I listed actual on screen feats. Maybe you should try it sometime.

If H1 is so stupid and wrong all the time, why do you guys keep engaging him and getting worked up when he inevitably lies? Lol

^ Because we are easy to Troll.

Ah, guilty too. Wink

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Superman, too, apparently. Since Superman ran away from a 30mm round, right (following your logic, that is)?

So you admit you are not even familiar with the material. Lol.

I called it !

Originally posted by h1a8
Yes, the military has shit that can damage Superman. Superman took rounds from aircraft bullets without damage. So him running (don't even recall that) is irrelevant.
If Thor was shown to get hit without damage then him running becomes irrelevant.

It shows your retarded logic is out of the window.

Clearly evading bullets does not mean writers intended for bullets to be capable of killing/penetrating/seriously hurting that individual.

So you have zero proof Thor can not take aircraft bullets. Just retarded logic that has been proven to be false.

Good Bye Troll. You and Quan just carry on bring attention seeking retards with no actual points.

Originally posted by h1a8
Yes, the military has shit that can damage Superman. Superman took rounds from aircraft bullets without damage. So him running (don't even recall that) is irrelevant.
If Thor was shown to get hit without damage then him running becomes irrelevant.

Was Thor shown as standing in the direct line of fire and being uninjured?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Was Thor shown as standing in the direct line of fire and being uninjured?

He wasn't shown to get hit. The fire was randomly targeting the area (multiple characters).

Originally posted by Darth Thor
I called it !

It shows your retarded logic is out of the window.

Clearly evading bullets does not mean writers intended for bullets to be capable of killing/penetrating/seriously hurting that individual.

So you have zero proof Thor can not take aircraft bullets. Just retarded logic that has been proven to be false.

Good Bye Troll. You and Quan just carry on bring attention seeking retards with no actual points.

Originally posted by h1a8
Post the scene where Superman evades bullets.
Evading bullets proves it.
But if a character has been shown to be hit then the evading is irrelevant (stupid as well too).

IOW evading bullets proves it, unless it doesn't. interesting "logic".

Originally posted by h1a8
He wasn't shown to get hit. The fire was randomly targeting the area (multiple characters).

That wasn't my question. the question was.

Was Thor shown as standing in the direct line of fire and being uninjured?

Originally posted by h1a8
Post the scene where Superman evades bullets.
Evading bullets proves it.

Cant find on YouTube but its literally right after he gets shot in the head.

Originally posted by h1a8

But if a character has been shown to be hit then the evading is irrelevant (stupid as well too).

It proves you can not presume what writers intentions are.

Hence why we use ON SCREEN FEATS AND PROOF ONLY

H1 keeps my thread a live, without him I think this would be dead by now

Originally posted by Silent Master
That wasn't my question. the question was.

Was Thor shown as standing in the direct line of fire and being uninjured?

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Cant find on YouTube but its literally right after he gets shot in the head.

It proves you can not presume what writers intentions are.

Hence why we use ON SCREEN FEATS AND PROOF ONLY

I just rewatched the scene. Superman did run. Well that means aircraft bullets will hurt Superman. Writers had him run because they wanted the audience to know his limitations against military weaponry.