IW Thor vs Superman

Originally posted by h1a8
You are discussing semantics.
You are trolling. That has nothing to do with this thread. You are derailing it.
Focus on the argument at hand. Superman can withstand lightning well enough to stay in the battle for the reasons I gave.

Why are you so aggressively hesitant to answer a simple question? You're much more willing to write entire paragraphs to steer the conversation away instead of just saying yes or no.

Do you claim that Superman tanked that nuke, yes or no?

If you're not willing to clarify your statements then why do you even bother posting here?

Originally posted by h1a8
There is no such thing as full force of a star.
Full temperature of a star focused in a beam is a real concept.

The star was still luminous all around its surface while Thor was getting hit by the focused beam. The star continued to exist after the feat was over.

You compared Thor's feat to you tanking the sun from 93 million miles.

Why downplay Thor's feat so much?

Originally posted by FrothByte
Why are you so aggressively hesitant to answer a simple question? You're much more willing to write entire paragraphs to steer the conversation away instead of just saying yes or no.

Do you claim that Superman tanked that nuke, yes or no?

If you're not willing to clarify your statements then why do you even bother posting here?

How long are you going to continue to troll the thread? Stop derailing things and arguing semantics.
You became a pure troll like Silent, Quan, Eon, etc.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You compared Thor's feat to you tanking the sun from 93 million miles.

Why downplay Thor's feat so much?

I was proving your implication was false.
A star >>>>>>> nuke is not true necessarily.

Originally posted by h1a8
I was proving your implication was false.
A star >>>>>>> nuke is not true necessarily.

You compared Thor's feat to you tanking the sun from 93 million miles.

Why downplay Thor's feat so much?

Originally posted by Silent Master
You compared Thor's feat to you tanking the sun from 93 million miles.

Why downplay Thor's feat so much?

I guess you want to act stupid and pretend your comment wasn't false in its implication.

You compared Thor's feat to you tanking the sun from 93 million miles.

Why downplay Thor's feat so much?

Originally posted by Silent Master
You compared Thor's feat to you tanking the sun from 93 million miles.

Why downplay Thor's feat so much?

1. You claim I lied. You were wrong and then changed your stance.

2. You made a false statement. I gave a counter example. You were wrong and then changed your stance.

Taking the full temperature of a star is not greater than taking a nuke since nukes are hotter than a star. Then you have the blast pressure to deal with.

I claimed you lied about Thor's feat, which you did by comparing it to you tanking sunlight from 93 million milkes.

Why are you so biased against Thor?

Edit:Miles

Originally posted by h1a8
How long are you going to continue to troll the thread? Stop derailing things and arguing semantics.
You became a pure troll like Silent, Quan, Eon, etc.

Sure dude, whatever you say. Anyway, just let me know when you're ready for a two-way conversation where you actually address points and questions raised instead of just throwing random insults.

Originally posted by h1a8
Thor would be a statue.
Even if Superman allowed Thor to hit him with lightning then Superman would be just fine. Superman survived a nuke, and can withstand his own HV which can slice an Ibeam with a single swipe.

Thor has the lightning blasts and passive lightning and AoE Mjolnir to tag him and open with stormbreaker and he is overall superior in strength, skill, versatility and durability.

Thor stomps.

Originally posted by Darthvaderrocks
Thor has the lightning blasts and passive lightning and AoE Mjolnir to tag him and open with stormbreaker and he is overall superior in strength, skill, versatility and durability.

Thor stomps.

Superman is way stronger and more durable.
Not that any of that matters since the speed deficit is too great here. Thor would simply be a living statue.

Note: This is a bait post. The idea is to get me to say Superman is resistant to lightning. Then Silent jumps in. Obvious.

Originally posted by h1a8
What don't you get about being a statue? How would Thor do anything if he's a statue? Assuming Superman just sits there and allows Thor to make a move then Thor needs to aim where Superman is to hit him with lightning. If Superman moves then the lightning will miss. Thor only does AOE attacks against multiple enemies.

Superman is way stronger and more durable.
Not that any of that matters since the speed deficit is too great here. Thor would simply be a living statue.

Note: This is a bait post. The idea is to get me to say Superman is resistant to lightning. Then Silent jumps in. Obvious.

Thor's lightning blasts/cloak will negate the speed advantage. Thor wins in a hard fight tbh, Superman has only his speed going for him.

Thor moved the rings in nidavellir and survived a star, he's stronger and more durable than Superman by far.

Originally posted by Darthvaderrocks
Thor's lightning blasts/cloak will negate the speed advantage. Thor wins in a hard fight tbh, Superman has only his speed going for him.

Thor moved the rings in nidavellir and survived a star, he's stronger and more durable than Superman by far.

Thor would be a statue at the start. He won't get a chance to shoot lightning while bring frozen. Even if Superman allowed Thor to shoot lightning then Superman won't be in the same place.

The lightning cloak (assuming Thor uses it against a single opponent and Superman allows Thor time to achieve) will do absolutely nothing to Superman. You are acting as if Superman is an ordinary human trying to touch Thor.

Doomsday was not a stature nor was Cyborg, Aquaman, or WW. Thor wins. You do not need superspeed to hit him as the JL clearly proved.

Originally posted by Darthvaderrocks
Thor's lightning blasts/cloak will negate the speed advantage. Thor wins in a hard fight tbh, Superman has only his speed going for him.

Thor moved the rings in nidavellir and survived a star, he's stronger and more durable than Superman by far.

That post was made almost two years ago, are you desperately searching for Superman threads to respond to because you're a ****ing addict or something?

Well the forum seems pretty dead, so why not.

Besides Theres much worse addictions he could be desperate for.

Bane