Originally posted by Psychotron
Lol no they haven't. Provide proof.
They are clearly blocking blasters.
And again. Ares made pretty clear he was about to attack Diana. He even shout it.
Originally posted by Psychotron
Lol no they haven't. Provide proof.
They are clearly blocking blasters.
And again. Ares made pretty clear he was about to attack Diana. He even shout it.
Originally posted by CPT Space BombSuperman getting KO'd by a nuke is also frankly one of Superman's lower showings of durability.
As others have said, If Thor connects Superman dies. Also, Superman got Ko'd by a nuc, Thor took the full power of a neutron star for several minutes. Thor has better damage soak feats, and a Hammer that can power through infinity gauntlet trying to stop it....yah, Superman better not get hit.
Thor's neutron star feat is definitely easily the best durability feat he has, and I wouldn't think to take it away from him. It's not as impressive as people are thinking though. People are hyping it up that it's some planet to star durability+ level feat that brings him beyond Superman's ability to hurt. I had my doubts that was the case myself, but wanted to wait to see what some people who had a better idea about the physics and math behind the feat would say.
http://vsbattles.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Numbersguy/The_Chad_Thor_(Attempt_by_Numbersguy)#comm-1633391
This is what these nerds came up with, and the OBD apparently has his durability around the same level, though I couldn't find the calc for why.
Now, as far as Superman goes, he has a couple of durability feats quite a ways above the nuke one. The first is in Man of Steel, where he plows directly through the World Engine, which had enough energy to terraform the surface of the planet Earth, essentially altering the geography and atmosphere to being identical to that of Krypton.
The second feat, which was easily overlooked, as said in Justice League:
"The Mother Box was designed to reshape a planet. But what if you were stronger than a planet? If your cells were lying dormant, but incapable of decay? A boost from the Mother Box-"
"Could bring him back to life."
―Batman and the Flash
Superman withstood the energies of the Mother Box, which can reshape a planet, with Batman indicating that Superman being hardier than a planet is what would allow them to use the Mother Box to resurrect him. Which it does.
Now, is this quite a bit better than Superman's prior durability feats? Sure. Much like Thor surviving the neutron star's energies. 👆
Originally posted by Darth ThorYeah there is nothing quantifiable about Superman being able to withstand the world-altering energies to reshape a planet's surface because he's "stronger than a planet" lol. The bias is unreal.
^ Neither of those are quantifiable.What is quantifiable is measuring the heat and force of a Star next to that of a Nuclear Bomb.
Originally posted by NemeBro
Yeah there is nothing quantifiable about Superman being able to withstand the world-altering energies to reshape a planet's surface because he's "stronger than a planet" lol. The bias is unreal.
He stopped it before it reformed the planet. We have no idea how long that was gonna take.
So no not quantifiable at all.
His biggest quantifiable durability feat is the Nuke.
So either the World Engine feat is a Massive Contradiction, or its being blown completely out of proportion. In any case we should turn to the feat we understand better. Thats especially so with a Massive Contradiction.
Originally posted by Darth ThorYou might want to reread my post, because you apparently didn't grasp all of it.
He stopped it before it reformed the planet. We have no idea how long that was gonna take.So no not quantifiable at all.
His biggest quantifiable durability feat is the Nuke.
So either the World Engine feat is a Massive Contradiction, or its being blown completely out of proportion. In any case we should turn to the feat we understand better. Thats especially so with a Massive Contradiction.
Originally posted by SquallXYes, but he wasn't fighting ftl agains Doomsday either. Not always. He also got ko'd by a nuc. His showings thus far in the movies aren't NEARLY as impressive as his fanboys would like everyone to think.
You mean the same Superman that spent the whole fight trying to make Batman back down all the while being exposed to Kryptonite? You mean that movie?
Originally posted by SquallXHis mother’s life was on the line. He was motivated and failed despite having a reason to fight for his mother. Superman is a Boy Scout hence a huge glaring weakness right out of the gate. He isn’t some killer. Look at how he reacted after he killed Zod. Pansy.
You mean the same Superman that spent the whole fight trying to make Batman back down all the while being exposed to Kryptonite? You mean that movie?
Thor destroys him.
Originally posted by NemeBro? Show me a movie where superman uses superspeed every second of every fight...in fact he rarely uses it in the movies. Based off the movies There will be times where Thor hits him. Superman isn't going to be able to do enough damage to Thor without getting hit back.. THor's hits, now with Stormbreaker, are going to WRECK Superman. Superman needs better durability feats in the movies...then we'll talk.
The denial.
Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
? Show me a movie where superman uses superspeed every second of every fight...in fact he rarely uses it in the movies. Based off the movies There will be times where Thor hits him. Superman isn't going to be able to do enough damage to Thor without getting hit back.. THor's hits, now with Stormbreaker, are going to WRECK Superman. Superman needs better durability feats in the movies...then we'll talk.
Basically depends if Superman will try to tank the shots or try to dodge. In JL he just tanked the shots because he knew he couldnt be hurt. He did use it against Flash and Steppenwolf so I guess it comes down to Superman thinking Thor is a threat from the beginning or not.