Baby Alfie

Would you rather get killed instantly or slowly tortured to death? If you answered the former, you acknowledge that some things are worse than death.

As long as there is Life you should fight to save it. That is a problem with the Leftist Mind Set. They have been CHEAPENING Life for decades.

You didn't answer my question

Originally posted by The Ellimist
The baby is potentially suffering and in pain, and there is no cure. Beni is right.

He never will. Mwahahahaha.

He probably won't though.

I think I would choose the LIVE One. Cause if I am ALIVE I can continue to FIGHT!

And funny how you compare the Baby Alfie Scenario to a Torture Session.

Kind of What the Land of U.K Doctors are doing. They are HOLDING Alfie a Literally Prisoner in that country.
Think how much money it would save the state if they let some other country take over the med bills.

And I toss your question back at you.

WHICH OPTION WOULD YOU CHOOSE?!

Originally posted by Stigma
Who has the better claim on the kid's life?

Medical science

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Medical science

Nice to know that You Support State Approved Slavery.

PEOPLE NOW BELONG TO THE STATE!!!!!!!!

😱

yeah ok you have to be a troll

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Medical science

Because what's factually deemed best for the child should take priority over the parent's wishes. The parents don't have the authority to dictate a course of action that would prolong the child's suffering.

Originally posted by Stigma
Why?

More generally children aren't the property of their parents and we don't allow things like child abuse, so there's a clear precedence for the welfare for the child overriding parental authority.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Because what's factually deemed best for the child should take priority over the parent's wishes. The parents don't have the authority to dictate a course of action that would prolong the child's suffering.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
More generally children aren't the property of their parents and we don't allow things like child abuse, so there's a clear precedence for the welfare for the child overriding parental authority.

I have a Differing Opinion to him/her/it. To ...that just automatically makes those that DISAGREE a "Troll".

I answered you little Question? Can You give an answer to it yourself?

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Would you rather get killed instantly or slowly tortured to death? If you answered the former, you acknowledge that some things are worse than death.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
More generally children aren't the property of their parents and we don't allow things like child abuse, so there's a clear precedence for the welfare for the child overriding parental authority.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
More generally children aren't the property of their parents and we don't allow things like child abuse, so there's a clear precedence for the welfare for the child overriding parental authority.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Because what's factually deemed best for the child should take priority over the parent's wishes. The parents don't have the authority to dictate a course of action that would prolong the child's suffering.

So in other words. We can walk up to any Parents in the History of the World point at the child and say...

in which flyboy reveals what this is really about: ma property rights. 🙁

Originally posted by Beniboybling
in which flyboy reveals what this is really about: ma property rights. 🙁

This is How Babies are Made! Aint that right Beni!?

Originally posted by The Ellimist
More generally children aren't the property of their parents and we don't allow things like child abuse, so there's a clear precedence for the welfare for the child overriding parental authority.

So if children aren’t the property of their parents, those this means their are the Government’s property then?

Be real careful with your answer if you chooses the latter!