Baby Alfie

Started by dadudemon8 pages

Originally posted by Surtur
The baby self identifies as a healthy baby and not a sick one.

Boom, nailed it. Now the UK needs to explain why healthy babies can't go to Italy.

Checkmate, atheists.

i agree with beni and elm

Originally posted by DarthSkywalker0
i agree with beni and elm

SO you think that we are just Slaves to what every Government we are subject to?

And that is pure Fascism right there.

So no shock.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]SO you think that we are just Slaves to what every Government we are subject to?

And that is pure Fascism right there.

So no shock. [/B]

yes, the ancap thinks that we should be slaves to the government.

Viva La Revolution.

So the kid passed away this morning:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/apr/28/alfie-evans-dies-after-withdrawal-of-life-support

finally the end of it

Let the lawsuit began.

Surtur’s right. If this baby’s parents were rich, are the royal babies, they would have not denied them the chance to seek further medical help elsewhere, no matter how slim the chances were.

The kid was basically a corpse with a pulse. He wasn’t suffering.

Originally posted by SquallX
Let the lawsuit began.

Surtur’s right. If this baby’s parents were rich, are the royal babies, they would have not denied them the chance to seek further medical help elsewhere, no matter how slim the chances were.

The chances weren't slim, they were non-existent, the vast majority of his brain had been reduced to fluid, medical professional after medical professional ruled that there was no chance he would ever recover.

Do you think that its ethically responsible to artificially prolong a child's life when there is no chance at all of him ever getting better?

Originally posted by Beniboybling
The chances weren't slim, they were non-existent, the vast majority of his brain had been reduced to fluid, medical professional after medical professional ruled that there was no chance he would ever recover.

Do you think that its ethically responsible to artificially prolong a child's life when there is no chance at all of him ever getting better?

Just tell me you can answer "yes" to the question of "would this have played out exactly the same if this was Will and Kates kid?".

In fact I encourage anyone who thinks the answer is "yes" to say so.

Why should I waste time answering your dumb question?

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Why should I waste time answering your dumb question?

Because you just wasted time asking me why you should waste time.

IMO if he was Will and Kate's kid instead of being a corpse he'd be in Italy receiving treatment. And that is wrong on so many levels.

No I’d like to know, why do you think this question is relevant?

Originally posted by Beniboybling
So the kid passed away this morning:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/apr/28/alfie-evans-dies-after-withdrawal-of-life-support


Yes. Good Thing they pretty much kept the child Prisoner until the State got its wishes and the Child Died. When the State Wants You Dead. It will Have its way.

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
The kid was basically a corpse with a pulse. He wasn’t suffering.

So you were one of the Medical Professionals working this case?

Funny how 2 of our Homosexual Posters are 2 of the most UNSYMPATHETIC in this issue. I thought The LGBTQXQYZ crowd were supposed to be More Open Heart-ed then everyone else?!

Next person the State will want to put on their "To Kill" List will probably be this guy......

Hopsital kicks Alfie's Family Priest out of Hopsital when He points out they are being watched by God...Aka They know what they did was Wrong!

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Medical science
👆 Perhaps I misjudged you. Good Post!

Originally posted by Beniboybling
No I’d like to know, why do you think this question is relevant?

It's relevant if the child would still be alive right now if he had a different set of parents.

Why is this shit so hard to answer for you? I will ask you one more time. Do you feel this child would have received the same treatment if he was a royal? A failure to answer will mean the answer is "no". And I don't care how you rationalize it, nor do I care if you're going to whine about relevancy, etc.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
So you were one of the Medical Professionals working this case?

Funny how 2 of our Homosexual Posters are 2 of the most UNSYMPATHETIC in this issue. I thought The LGBTQXQYZ crowd were supposed to be More Open Heart-ed then everyone else?!


No, but I don’t need to be a medical professional to know that someone who is braindead cannot feel pain or suffer.

Not sure if it’s me you’re calling gay, but I’m quite straight.