Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
I just watched the movie, and you could see all the Gems light up when he blasts Stormbreaker....basically PIS imo but yolo.Asgardian tech built the Bifrost, the Gauntlet, and harnessed the Tesseract among other things. This was meant to be the most powerful weapon in Asgard, waiting for its King.
You can light up all the gems to make up a flower 😂
^ Exactly. No ones saying SB Thor > Thanos with all Infinity Stones.
But HE DID beat him in their fight. Which is an amazing feat. By far the best of all Marvel heroes. And common sense tells us that shows SB Thor is more than likely > the Hulk trashing Thanos from the beginning of the movie.
And almost certainly greater than standard Thanos without any Infinity Stones.
Originally posted by CPT Space BombWhy doesn’t that count? We see how they match up. We see Thanos immediately attacked after Hulk just attacked him Nd he won there.
1. A severely weakened and beat up Thor wacking Thanos out of desperation with a pipe does not count FFS. Use context and common sense please. OBVIOUSLY when I say a weapon I'm referring to the magic/tech weapons of Nivadellir. Also, clearly Ragnarok DOESN'T put that to bed because again, Thor without a magic weapon was defeated badly; Thor with one almost killed Thanos.
This weapon is the greatest weapon he’s ever had so it’s obviously far superior to his hammer thus doesn’t apply to Odin’s Comments in Ragnarok. Mjolnir can’t use the bifrost either. Stormbreaker was a lot greater than mjolnir. Thor even admits without the axe it’s suicide to go after Thanos.
2. Thor was winning I agree. He didn’t defeat the Hulk and he’s got the skill edge in spades over the Hulk. Hulk weathered the storm and was ready to continue the fight. No one won at the point. That’s a fact regardless of your opinion on what would have occurred after we see Gm cheat.
2. Thor was kicking his ass untill he got 2v1'd. It's clear as day. Grandmaster was worried because Thor was WINNING.4. Um, WRONG. Thanos was ATTEMPTING TO STOP Stormbreaker from hitting him and he COULDN'T. Sure, it's PIS, but it still happened. Thor almost killed Thanos with a Nivadellir weapon. I agree with the last part though. If Thor didn't have Stormbreaker he'd have absolutely no shot against Thanos. BUT, That's WHO THOR IS. The weapon is part of who and what Thor is. It's been like that since the beginning. The hammer is just as much a part of Thor as invulnerability is to Superman, or Strength to Hulk; even moreso actually. [/B]
4. He just used the stones and was caught off guard by a lightning blast. Another cheapshot from Thor he’s used to those against Thanos.
It’s no different than Tony Stark blocking a blast from the stone. That doesn’t mean his shield is greater in power than the output of the stone. It’s the same here. The axe with the velocity that it was thrown was greater than the blast sent at Thor. That’s all.
Almost isn’t getting the job done. He failed. They almost got the gauntlet off Thanos but he prevailed in both instances. Close but failure all the same. Hammer yes but he doesn’t need it to channel his power. The new axe makes him far deadlier than mjolnir ever did.
Originally posted by CPT Space BombWith the stormbreaker of course he is the most powerful avenger. Captain Marvel is coming into the fray and we will see Hulk the true physical brute back and ready to take on Thanos in the end.
Yah Thanos allowed IM to fight for a minute. Thor almost killed Thanos. Big difference in power there. Thor is currently the most powerful Avenger and its not really close now that Strange and Scarlett Witch are gone.
Originally posted by Darth ThorWith a new axe due to the axe he is. Hulk is still stronger and physically superior to Thor. The beginning proved it. I am always right you believed Thor needed his hammer whereas Odin mocked you in the film.
I Told You from day 1 who the True Powerhouse of the Avengers was. Hulk couldnt even beat Thor in Ragnarok when he had no Mjolnir or Storm Breaker.Never question me again.
Thor did better against Hela without the hammer, kiddo. Thor doesn’t need the hammer but you never believed in him just the weapons. I’m right as always.
Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
Yah Thanos allowed IM to fight for a minute.
??
I think everyone in this thread agrees that Thor with the Storm Breaker is the most powerful Avenger , but here we are talking about Regular Thor , so i don't see why everyone is so keen on using the storm breaker scene to prove their point.
Originally posted by DrDeadpoolRegular Thor still has amazing feats. Thor 1 and Ragnarok show hust how powerful he can be when he tries. Regular Thor can beat any IM.
??I think everyone in this thread agrees that Thor with the Storm Breaker is the most powerful Avenger , but here we are talking about Regular Thor , so i don't see why everyone is so keen on using the storm breaker scene to prove their point.
Those moon chunks weren't coming in very fast. Hell Spider-man was able to dodge them AND save multiple people with ease. Iron Man purposely tried to slow one down, he could have easily avoided it had he wanted. Thor destroyed vast sections of Jotunheim with one strike in Thor 1, has sent Hulk flying across the arena in Ragnarok and actually hit the Destroyer so hard it dented it. He also has the shared feat with IM of Sokovia, but he's the one that provided the blow. Either way no one has ever thrown chunks of a moon before like Thanos, but Thor could have easily tanked that as well.
Originally posted by Darth ThorHis power is the same as per Odin. He went off at the end of Ragnarok channeling it far better than with the hammer. Nah, he couldn’t budge Thanos with a weapon and a cheapshot. He needs the best weapon ever created to hurt Thanos and he still failed despite the cheapshot.
@ Quan. Dont hide behind the Axe now when you always claimed his power is the same regardless.Thor is the Powerhouse as I always corrected you on.
Always listen to me.
I'm gonna laugh if they release the fight footage of Thor vs Thanos round 1 and Thanos needed his children to help him beat Thor. Since the fight took place completely off screen, we have NO IDEA how long or how hard (that's what she said) the fight was. Thor would not have gone down easily. The only thing we kow for sure is that Hulk got obliterated ON SCREEN. That's it.
Originally posted by CPT Space BombWe see Thor interact on screen and he didn’t budge Thanos. Thor isn’t as strong as the Hulk. He never will be. It’s funny how it only matters if Thanos had help but you completely disregard Hulk jumping Thanos prior to Thor. This isn’t Doom this is Thanos. Thanos is much more powerful than Doom.
I'm gonna laugh if they release the fight footage of Thor vs Thanos round 1 and Thanos needed his children to help him beat Thor. Since the fight took place completely off screen, we have NO IDEA how long or how hard (that's what she said) the fight was. Thor would not have gone down easily. The only thing we kow for sure is that Hulk got obliterated ON SCREEN. That's it.
Originally posted by FrothByteWe see Thor after the explosion and the damage he had fine after gotg found him. Yes, I compare it since Thor cheapshotted him with a weapon. Thor isn’t as strong as the Hulk. We already saw that in their fight. Thor is more skilled and a better warrior but Hulk is the physical behemoth. Every time they are both on the same screen Hulk is more physically impressive. Just accept it, fanboy.
^ Because, as has been mentioned numerous times, Thor was already badly beaten and injured at that point. In other words, he wasn't at 100%. Are you telling me you want to compare Hulk at full strength vs. a Thor that's already badly hurt and tired?