****'s sake, there's an obvious difference between utilizing something from another culture, and lying for your own personal or political gain.
The attack on Warren's character is that she's a liar, not that she used some native American recipe that she had no right to use.
This is just some pathetic semantics bullshit.
Originally posted by Robtard
Yeah, you most certainly did have a problem and it wasn't a "I was just joking" thing.eg you attacked Warren's integrity and character as a person because of her Native American cookbook and the alleged cultural lies attached to it.
LOL! That cookbook was hilarious, I'd forgotten about it. It doesn't make me angry. She says dumb shit, like her thing about cheekbones.
Originally posted by Emperordmb
****'s sake, there's an obvious difference between utilizing something from another culture, and lying for your own personal or political gain.
I'm not sure. The fact is, all Dances with Donors had to do was claim minority status to get a job at Harvard University and change nothing else about her resume. That just shows the problem with quotas. And frankly, if a place like Harvard wants to play that game of racial politics then they should be taken advantaged of because it's a worthless and stupid game to play.
Originally posted by ESB -1138
I'm not sure. The fact is, all Dances with Donors had to do was claim minority status to get a job at Harvard University and change nothing else about her resume. That just shows the problem with quotas. And frankly, if a place like Harvard wants to play that game of racial politics then they should be taken advantaged of because it's a worthless and stupid game to play.
Don't worry Harvard brought in the top cheekbone inspector in the world. He verified she has native american cheekbones.
Also she can turn into a wolf or eagle.
Originally posted by ESB -1138
I'm not sure. The fact is, all Dances with Donors had to do was claim minority status to get a job at Harvard University and change nothing else about her resume. That just shows the problem with quotas. And frankly, if a place like Harvard wants to play that game of racial politics then they should be taken advantaged of because it's a worthless and stupid game to play.
Originally posted by Robtard
You're yelling "troll" to avoid the issue again, because you clearly had a problem with people like Warren and Dolezal, who appropriated other cultures, ergo, by your own actions you do feel there are instances when it's not okay to culturally appropriate.
Like imagine for a sec that the government or some organization gave out some kind of grant(or something along those lines) for people who took care of lions at their homes. He could be ok with people dressing up their dog to look like a lion and still be against people who do so actually filing for the grant.
Originally posted by darthgoober
Seems like you're trying to stawman his position here. From what I've gathered he's taking issue with what's basically a form of fraud, to which cultural appropriation would be a part of.Like imagine for a sec that the government or some organization gave out some kind of grant(or something along those lines) for people who took care of lions at their homes. He could be ok with people dressing up their dog to look like a lion and still be against people who do so actually filing for the grant.
While he'll quickly jump on any assistance out of desperation, you are in fact agreeing with what I was saying, that what Warren and Dolezal are accused of is a part of cultural appropriation and what he had issue with initially before changing stances.
Originally posted by Robtard
While he'll quickly jump on any assistance out of desperation, you are in fact agreeing with what I was saying, that what Warren and Dolezal are accused of is a part of cultural appropriation and what he had issue with initially before changing stances.
Originally posted by darthgoober
No you have it backwards. Cultural appropriation is part of what Warren and Dolezal did. It's basically a lesser included offense to the real crime he's taking issue with.
That's overall irrelevant, it's still an aspect of the same, we essentially have the same views on the matter.
This came up because he said: Actually, there is no "not okay cultural appropriation".-Surtur
Clearly he felt there are instances in regards to Warren's and Dolezal's actions when it isn't okay.
Originally posted by Robtard
That's irrelevant, it's still an aspect of the same.This came up because he said: Actually, there is no "not okay cultural appropriation".-Surtur
Clearly he felt there are instances in regards to Warren's and Dolezal's actions.
You can appropriate cultures. You just can't lie like a little weasel about it.
Why do I need to explain this to an adult?
Originally posted by Robtard
That's overall irrelevant, it's still an aspect of the same, we essentially have the same views on the matter.This came up because he said: Actually, there is no "not okay cultural appropriation".-Surtur
Clearly he felt there are instances in regards to Warren's and Dolezal's actions when it isn't okay.
Originally posted by Robtard
Therefore you feel there are indeed certain instances when it's not okay. Congrats on sinking your own previous arguments.
I don't see cultural appropriation as lying about what you are. And that isn't how leftist cucks in this country use the term.
Are you going to claim you are not aware of this? Yes or no, are you aware?
Originally posted by Robtard
Which means there are instances when it's wrong... (the point)