What is Culture Appreciation!

Originally posted by JMANGO
surely robbie wasn't this much of a headache when he wasn't as old.

It reminds me of what leftists tried to pull after the Parkland shooting to justify lies about "there have been 18 school shootings this year!".

Yes, technically there were. Assuming you count a kid committing suicide as a "school shooting". Yes, a gun was fired on school grounds, but it wasn't a school shooting in the sense of the definition that springs to the minds of most Americans: which is some kid bringing a gun to school and killing others.

Originally posted by darthgoober
Again it seems like you're trying to twisting the issue. If his point is about the LYING rather than what's being lied about then there's no real contradiction to what he's saying. By the same token one can say "There's never anything wrong with having two children" but then later saying "It's wrong to say you have 3 children when you only have 2". You're not actually saying that it's wrong to have 2 children, your'e saying the lie itself is wrong.

Originally posted by Surtur
It does, because I see leftist cucks using the term in the way I use it. That is how you guys tend to define this. One more time: are you going to say that is not true?

If you use the term in the same matter as a "Leftist cucks" and you have a problem with their usage, what does that say about you? Weird, is your blood-sugar low again?

Originally posted by darthgoober
Again it seems like you're trying to twisting the issue. If his point is about the LYING rather than what's being lied about then there's no real contradiction to what he's saying. By the same token one can say "There's never anything wrong with having two children" but then later saying "It's wrong to say you have 3 children when you only have 2". You're not actually saying that it's wrong to have 2 children, your'e saying the lie itself is wrong.

There is no twisting, they're one/same.

Originally posted by Robtard
If you use the term in the same matter as a "Leftist cucks" and you have a problem with their usage, what does that say about you? Weird, is your blood-sugar low again?

Leftists are who whine most about cultural appropriation. And how they define it is not "this person is claiming they are native american when they arent!".

It is psychopathic shit like "they wore a dress native americans invented and they arent native american"

If you are too ignorant or too stupid to understand the difference, or just plain unwilling...that is not my problem.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Yeah this is some pathetic weasel shit right here

^ Is that because I said you're down for some BBC or purely support for Surt's drowning? Combo?

Originally posted by Surtur
Leftists are who whine most about cultural appropriation. And how they define it is not "this person is claiming they are native american when they arent!".

It is psychopathic shit like "they wore a dress native americans invented and they arent native american"

If you are too ignorant or too stupid to understand the difference, or just plain unwilling...that is not my problem.

You disparaged "Leftist cucks" for using the term in a certain matter and then said you use it in the same manner. Again, are you feeling okay? Do you need a 4th maybe to assist here?

If you look back, I noted that simply wearing some traditional items of a different culture isn't wrong and you know this, as you responded to that post.

Originally posted by Robtard
There is no twisting, they're one/same.

Originally posted by Robtard
You disparaged "Leftist cucks" for using the term in a certain matter and then said you use it in the same manner. Again, are you feeling okay? Do you need a 4th maybe to assist here?

If you look back, I noted that simply wearing some traditional items of a different culture isn't wrong and you know this, as you responded to that post.

I use the the term the way the people who use the term and whine about it use it.

I know you think you are clever, but you truly aren't. Do better.

Originally posted by darthgoober
No it's not the same. Yet another example, "There's absolutely nothing wrong with driving a car" does not contradict "It's wrong to run people over with a car".

Sorry, they are. Your examples are apple/oranges.

Originally posted by Robtard
Sorry, they are. Your examples are apple/oranges.

Originally posted by Surtur
I use the the term the way the people who use the term and whine about it use it.

I know you think you are clever, but you truly aren't. Do better.

LoL, seriously, are you feeling alright?

Originally posted by Robtard
If you look back, I noted that simply wearing some traditional items of a different culture isn't wrong and you know this, as you responded to that post.

Fact check: true

Originally posted by darthgoober
I strongly disagree with both of those statements lol.

Fair enough.

Originally posted by Robtard
LoL, seriously, are you feeling alright?

Lol you failed. But keep asking kiddo.

Originally posted by ESB -1138
Fact check: true

He tried to strawman; but failed. Facts are facts.

Originally posted by Robtard
He tried to strawman; but failed. Facts are facts.

You failed weasel. Do better.

You've been trying to turn the convo into another insult shit-fest for over a page now, you do this as a way to avoid facing that you were wrong, Surt.

Originally posted by Robtard
You've been trying to turn the convo into another insult shit-fest for over a page now, you do this as a way to avoid facing that you were wrong, Surt.

At this point your trolling is obvious and a bit sad. Mix it up a notch if you plan to continue.

Originally posted by Robtard
^ Is that because I said you're down for some BBC or purely support for Surt's drowning? Combo?

In an attempt to impugn Surtur's intellectual or moral character as either an idiot or a liar, you're zeroing in on some vagary in Surtur's statement that isn't even important and obsessing over it.

Best case scenario for Surtur, what me and like two other people are telling you about the distinction between what Surtur said and the example you brought up holds, and you're just wrong.

Worst case scenario for Surtur, you're right, and it was a mere imprecision in speech or conceptualization of the categories on Surtur's part that's understandable given how other people are debating you on it.

Either way none of this takes away from Surtur's overall point which is that something being from another culture being used in and of itself is not a valid reason to complain, while people lying and attempting to disingenuously weasel their way into unearned positions of social influence is immoral.

You aren't really trying to detract from the valid point he's making, you're trying to impugn his moral and intellectual character in a very weak way. Usually I try to stay out of the bullshit that gets traded back and forth between you two but this is just sad.