Originally posted by Darth Thor
I mean he cant manipulate the Thing but can manipulate Colossus.He cant manipulate Beast but can manipulate Black Panther.
He cant manipulate Palpatine but can manipulate Vader.
So my point is its usually a 50/50 with Magneto if he can instantly own someone or not. Its just the danger of his power with metal being used in almost everything. And the ridiculous ease with which he controls metal. So I dont see it as an unfair advantage, or weakness exploitation. Weakness exploitation would be using Kryptonite against Superman.
Then if we add in his Apoc powers, of an invulnerable magnetic shield and control over the Earth as well, it just vastly increases his chances against that other 50% of combatants.
Okay. I will sum this up with a simple question. Would Magneto have an easier or harder time defeating Strange if there was no metal in his hands? Based on your initial response to this thread, I imagine your answer would be harder. And if your answer is harder, then I fail to see how you cannot consider him targeting Strange's hands as weakness exploitation. So, guess we will have to agree to disagree on that.
But answer me this. What feats does his forcefield have to suggest it's invulnerable?