Who is a better strategist ? lex luthor vs Thanos

Started by Single-Cell7 pages

Who is a better strategist ? lex luthor vs Thanos

lex luthor from Batman V Superman against Thanos from Infinity War , who is better in making strategies ?

Thanos.

Thanos didn't have strategies. His method of winning was to throw an army at everything or just show up, stomp everyone, and take the stone.

Lex, despite how much I hate this incarnation of him, at least had a plan he carried out as by himself, and he figured out/exploited the fact that Lois was Supes' weakness.

Originally posted by Arachnid1
Thanos didn't have strategies. His method of winning was to throw an army at everything or just show up, stomp everyone, and take the stone.

Lex, despite how much I hate this incarnation of him, at least had a plan he carried out as by himself, and he figured out/exploited the fact that Lois was Supes' weakness.

False, he used Gamora to locate the soul stone. Lex failed despite his shitty plan of attempting to bring down Superman. Thanos achieved a goal despite his army’s failure. He did it himself. Thanos faced much stiffer competition than what Lex was up against.

If Superman or Batman had exercised an ounce of common-sense, Lex's plans would have completely failed.

That said, Thanos didn't exactly make any elaborate plans himself. He blackmailed Loki by torturing Thor, blackmailed Gamora by torturing Nebula, but that's pretty much it. Of course, Thanos didn't need any elaborate planning because he was strong enough to just take what he wanted.

So taking that into account, I'd have to give Thanos the default win. It's better to have no plan than be the one with an idiotic plan.

Thanos

Luthor. The only reason superman is alive is because his adopted mom shares the same name as Martha Wayne, plus technically superman was dead by the end of the film, so......

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Luthor. The only reason superman is alive is because his adopted mom shares the same name as Martha Wayne, plus technically superman was dead by the end of the film, so......
Necause Luthor wanted to be locked up by the end. Thanos prevailed against better competition. This isn’t close. Universal goal not a planetary one, kid.

Bottom line, Thanos succeeded. Luthor failed.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Bottom line, Thanos succeeded. Luthor failed.

Luthor didn't fail, Superman died at the end of BvS; did you even watch the movie??

So being sent to jail and Batman surviving were part of his plan?

Thanos has failed multiple times as well. And his “win” in IW is only temporary. Seems a silly way to decide which is the better strategist based on that.

I don't remember Thanos failing in IW, what scenes are you talking about?

Originally posted by ares834
Thanos has failed multiple times as well. And his “win” in IW is only temporary. Seems a silly way to decide which is the better strategist based on that.
When did he fail ? What villain in either comic universe faced more heroes and greater power than Thanos? You’re an idiot.

You have to say Thanos but that is only because of Plot Armor and WIS. Or should that be WIL?

But yeah. He is Plotted to win so the writers don't have to really TRY to do it well.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]You have to say Thanos but that is only because of Plot Armor and WIS. Or should that be WIL?

But yeah. He is Plotted to win so the writers don't have to really TRY to do it well.

[/B]

Thanos won Lex didn’t. Thanos faced more heroes, greater heroes, more powerful heroes and still came out on top whereas a Luthor didn’t. It’s ok that the dc guy loses to the MCU guy. It’s been happening at the box office for a decade now.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thanos won Lex didn’t. Thanos faced more heroes, greater heroes, more powerful heroes and still came out on top whereas a Luthor didn’t. It’s ok that the dc guy loses to the MCU guy. It’s been happening at the box office for a decade now.

He won in Avg:Inf Part 1. Will he win in Part 2? Which is just the continuation of the same story?

And I don't think you care as much about the Characters in these movies as you say you do wheras you what you really care about is having a brand to back and pretend that You matter with in it.

Which You really don't.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]He won in Avg:Inf Part 1. Will he win in Part 2? Which is just the continuation of the same story?

And I don't think you care as much about the Characters in these movies as you say you do wheras you what you really care about is having a brand to back and pretend that You matter with in it.

Which You really don't. [/B]

It is two different films. What the **** are you even talking about ? Dude, are you ok? Thanos prevailed against greater heroes and more of them than the pitiful Luthor.

Dude, I do care unlike you which is why no one respects or likes you. You care for nothing and are nothing. You’re a loser.

Luthor didn't have an All Purpose MacGuffin Glove. And Luthor in other Stories has WON against the Heroes. These are JUST Stories. Thanos ISN"t a Real Person. This is just like Wrestling on TV. Or do you think that is real too?

Thanos WON because the Story required it. He will Lose when the Story requires it.

Take a Step into reality some time Quanny Boy.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Luthor didn't have an All Purpose MacGuffin Glove. And Luthor in other Stories has WON against the Heroes. These are JUST Stories. Thanos ISN"t a Real Person. This is just like Wrestling on TV. Or do you think that is real too?

Thanos WON because the Story required it. He will Lose when the Story requires it.

Take a Step into reality some time Quanny Boy. [/B]

Thanos got the stones. The heroes had some of them as well you turd. Thanos won Luthor lost. Facts. Thanos wins based off facts. Just like your political leanings you don’t seem to care about facts. You’re a loser.