Originally posted by Silent Master
Prove he was using 10^6k and 10km
Originally posted by h1a8
I can't prove that.
I can only give evidence supporting that he did.I can intend to use 71254 but accidentally plug in 71524.
He could have used 11km instead of 10km. He could have used 1,500,000k as the temperature. All we know are the numbers he posted (10^6 and 10km in one of his sources)
Originally posted by Silent Master
Post the timestamp where he says what numbers he used in his equation.
It's a waste of time having a discussion with you. You don't read anything someone post.
I stated I don't know what he plugged into the formula. But we do know the values he presented prior.
If he used different values than what he presented or linked to is worse than making a mistake, it's being deceitful.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, provide the timestamp where he gave us the numbers he used in his equation
"... he used in his equation. ".
Why are you trolling me?
I already responded to this.
Just read what I wrote and respond accordingly. Stop asking the same questions as if I didn't respond to them.
Originally posted by h1a8
There is nothing to Battlezone.
Nibedicus is creating a strawman.
Just h1 trying to rewrite the narrative by continuously telling his usual lies. No one is falling for it tho. He just needs to get the last word in so he can (in the future) use this as proof later on that he "didn't refuse a BZ".
Also:
>claims credentialed individual committed several errors.
>uses different values in his equation as credentialed individual and comes up with different result.
>uses his math (with the different values) as evidence to claim that since he came up with different result, credentialed individual must have committed an error in his math.
>doesn't get the absolute stupidity of that.
#h1logic
Originally posted by h1a8
"... he used in his equation. ".Why are you trolling me?
I already responded to this.Just read what I wrote and respond accordingly. Stop asking the same questions as if I didn't respond to them.
If you want me to stop asking you the same question, try answering it. you claimed that he made mistakes in his math.
Prove it.
Originally posted by h1a8
"... he used in his equation. ".Why are you trolling me?
I already responded to this.Just read what I wrote and respond accordingly. Stop asking the same questions as if I didn't respond to them.
Originally posted by Silent Master
If you want me to stop asking you the same question, try answering it. you claimed that he made mistakes in his math.Prove it.
Here, h1, let me help you so you no longer embarrass yourself. The correct response would be:
A correct response for h1a8 to use
I don't have any evidence for where he got the numbers in his equation. Because I don't recall/can't find where he mentioned them in his videos.I'm sorry I tried to lowball the "feat" by manipulating the values then tried to pass the same equation off (with manipulated values) as proof to claim he was wrong.
Guess I got a little greedy.
I'm sorry KMC for always being such a dishonest turd.
Originally posted by h1a8
If he did not use those numbers then why in the hell did he post them in the video and link to the other one?
That's being deceitful which is far worse than making an error.
Anyway, this argument is stupid.
Where in the video did he state those were the average numbers a neutron star or that he was using those numbers for his equation?
BTW, you still haven't backed up your claim that he made several math errors.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Where in the video did he state those were the average numbers a neutron star or that he was using those numbers for his equation?BTW, you still haven't backed up your claim that he made several math errors.
He gave the value of the temperature of a neutron star.
He linked to the radius of a neutron star.
He posted the equation that can be used to calculate the power.
So if he used different numbers then he didn't make a mistake, but rather was deceitful.
H1 logical fallacies 101.
“The youtube video guy was being deceptive”
This kids is an example of what is called a red herring.
It is an absurd comment meant to catch attention so as to divert the focus of the debate away from the fact that h1 attempted to manipulate math in order to lowball Thor’s “feat” (as is his MO) and to cast doubt on the credibility of the youtube video.
Furthermore:
h1 has now completely down-low disavowed his "600k K" equation as "proof of YT video's math error" and moved the goalposts to the values of the source (who likely used a different sampling method via the words "typical" vs the YT video's word "average"😉 I provided. Practically admitting that the math he provided was at best false, at worst (and most likely) manipulated.
h1 has already admitted that he cannot prove what the YT guy's numbers were and yet insists that the YT guy's numbers are those he wants them to be.
We all know that if h1 had not been exposed, he would have been (dishonest lying turd as he is) used this as facts and truths by default. Fortunately, that ended with this debate. Due to known propensity for deceit, h1's math can now be dismissed as false by default unless corroborated exactly by a credible source or credible poster (who is familiar with the science).
This debate is over and h1 is already exposed but he wants to carry it on to get the last word because he knows this will haunt him in future debates so he needs to get the last word so that in future debates he can go "I didn't manipulate the numbers, see I got the last word in!". Even though all he is doing now is just repeating the same flawed arguments over and over again.
Originally posted by h1a8
He gave the value of the temperature of a neutron star.
He linked to the radius of a neutron star.
He posted the equation that can be used to calculate the power.So if he used different numbers then he didn't make a mistake, but rather was deceitful.
So now you're claiming that he said all neutron stars have the same temp and radius?
Post the timestamp where he states that.
Originally posted by Nibedicus👆
H1 logical fallacies 101.“The youtube video guy was being deceptive”
This kids is an example of what is called a red herring.
It is an absurd comment meant to catch attention so as to divert the focus of the debate away from the fact that h1 attempted to manipulate math in order to lowball Thor’s “feat” (as is his MO) and to cast doubt on the credibility of the youtube video.
Furthermore:
h1 has now completely down-low disavowed his "600k K" equation as "proof of YT video's math error" and moved the goalposts to the values of the source (who likely used a different sampling method via the words "typical" vs the YT video's word "average"😉 I provided. Practically admitting that the math he provided was at best false, at worst (and most likely) manipulated.
h1 has already admitted that he cannot prove what the YT guy's numbers were and yet insists that the YT guy's numbers are those he wants them to be.
We all know that if h1 had not been exposed, he would have been (dishonest lying turd as he is) used this as facts and truths by default. Fortunately, that ended with this debate. Due to known propensity for deceit, h1's math can now be dismissed as false by default unless corroborated exactly by a credible source or credible poster (who is familiar with the science).
This debate is over and h1 is already exposed but he wants to carry it on to get the last word because he knows this will haunt him in future debates so he needs to get the last word so that in future debates he can go "I didn't manipulate the numbers, see I got the last word in!". Even though all he is doing now is just repeating the same flawed arguments over and over again.
If I were you I’d never waste my time even creating a thread for h1 anymore. He’s a liar as you knew amd further proved but he lacks any nuts and tries to change the goalposts every single time. He’s been doing this for years and arguing through ignorance and bias.
He’s never been respected by anyone nor seen any debate actually through a battlezone like a man. He’s cowardly, dumb, and ignorant to the point it’s fun to mock him. I’ll never stop mocking him but I also know he will never see anything through because he’s a gutless coward not worthy of a battlezone. He had the chance but now he’s dismissed for all time from ever even being respected enough to have the opportunity.
Don’t be stupid nibedicus.
I have said multiple times that he made an error if he used 10^6k and 10km (we get 0.186Lo).
You can post a wall if you want. It’s just gibberish really.
If he didn’t use those numbers then I’m wrong.
But I would then say that it deceives is.
Why not post the values he used, and not some other values?