Originally posted by Silent Master
Prove your numbers represent the average neutron star, otherwise they're just another sad and pathetic attempt to lowball a Thor feat.
I don’t use averages. It’s invalid to do so.
I use lower estimates. That shows the minimum requirements for the feat.
Neutron star’s temperature reduce to around 10^6 after a few years. The temperature gradually reduces over time.
That star is most likely thousands to millions of years old as it form Mjolnir well before Thor was born (and all the other asgardians except Odin).
None of that is proof that he made math errors, like you claimed he did.
Back up your claim.
BTW, I like how H1 just admitted he knows absolutely nothing about neutron stars, as most neutron stars are actually billions of years old. him calling that star thousands to millions of years old would mean it is one of the youngest neutron stars in the universe and thus it's temperature would be exceedingly High.
Originally posted by Silent Master
None of that is proof that he made math errors, like you claimed he did.Back up your claim.
BTW, I like how H1 just admitted he knows absolutely nothing about neutron stars, as most neutron stars are actually billions of years old. him calling that star thousands to millions of years old would mean it is one of the youngest neutron stars in the universe and thus it's temperature would be exceedingly High.
Originally posted by h1a8
Don’t be stupid nibedicus.
I have said multiple times that he made an error if he used 10^6k and 10km (we get 0.186Lo).
You can post a wall if you want. It’s just gibberish really.If he didn’t use those numbers then I’m wrong.
But I would then say that it deceives is.
Why not post the values he used, and not some other values?
"Don't be stupid, as long as the numbers are manipulated by me, I can make it look wrong"
Durrr.