Can JL Superman Tank Hulks Leviathan Punch?

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Yes, stating that the credentialed youtube presenter who has no reason to be biased would be "deceitful" IF he didn't use the numbers you wanted him to be using is DEFINITELY just a conditional statement that does not imply anything.

Yes, we definitely do not see thru that BS.

🙄

I've got very low IQ? And you have "proooff"? Oh my!

Kinda funny that you purport to be smart yet don't have the guts to face me in any of the MULTIPLE times I've challenged you to a BZ.

"Smart" guy doesn't have the balls to face the guy he deems "low IQ" in a BZ.

Must be more cowardly than previously thought.

Tsk tsk. Pathetic.

You say "make things up", I say "observation from experience garnered from the many debates I've had with you, corroborated by many others".

Will let the forum decide w/c is more truthful.

shrug

What is it H1 is trying to prove now?

Originally posted by h1a8
It's real simple.
Science Guy stated that the neutron star Thor experience has a power output of 25% of the Sun.
Exibit A:
He gives us the formula that calculates power from Stars.
He therefore wants us to use it to verify his result.

Exibit B:
He posts the temperature of the neutron star as 10^6k, even though older stars have temperatures around 600,000k and his first link gives us 600,000k as a typical temperature of an older neutron star.

Exibit C: His first link gives 10km as the typical radius of a neutron star. The same value that Nibedicus' source from the Harvard PhD professor gives.

Plugging in 10km and 10^6k in the formula gives 18.6% (not 25%).

I originally plugged in 10km and 600,000k and got 2.4% I think. But later, I plugged in the values that were supplied.
But does not matter, as we do not get 25% from the numbers he provides.

What do you think, honestly, the conclusion is?
1. He made an error
Or
2. Something else (explain).

What are you arguing about now H1?

He's trying to prove Kyle Hill made math errors, problem is he's making up numbers in order to prove it.

In other words, H1 is being massively dishonest.

Originally posted by Silent Master
He's trying to prove Kyle Hill made math errors, problem is he's making up numbers in order to prove it.

In other words, H1 is being massively dishonest.

Well he calls himself the best physics/mathematician in KMC and yet fears to battlezone Nibe...

The guy has high self-esteem.

OMG!! I just read a couple of pages....

Is H1 actually stating that a neutron's star energy is < the sun?????

H1 has actually tried to imply that cutting a steel I-beam with heat vision was a comparable feat to Thor withstanding the full force of a neutron star

Originally posted by Silent Master
H1 has actually tried to imply that cutting a steel I-beam with heat vision was a comparable feat to Thor withstanding the full force of a neutron star

SERIOUSLY!!?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
SERIOUSLY!!?

Yep, he kept insisting that it took Star level heat to cut an I-beam with heat vision, the obvious implication he was going for was that Superman's heat vision was comparable to the energy Thor withstood during the neutron star scene.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
OMG!! I just read a couple of pages....

Is H1 actually stating that a neutron's star energy is < the sun?????

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yep, he kept insisting that it took Star level heat to cut an I-beam with heat vision, the obvious implication he was going for was that Superman's heat vision was comparable to the energy Thor withstood during the neutron star scene.

Poor h1. He's become insane!

Originally posted by quanchi112
Like you don’t know what your dad is suggesting. Lol.

h1 isn't related to me. And no, i haven't been spying on him like you.

He got hurt by a steel beam
A punch from Hulk is gonna at the very least knock him down

Originally posted by NemeBro
Seriously though, just ask dadudemon or Astner to take a look at your calcs. A Battlezone would be pointless if its filled with judges that don't actually have a solid grasp of math or physics. I can't think of anyone more qualified than them to.

There's actually one person who considers himself more qualified than anyone here:

Originally posted by h1a8
I know more about math and physics than any member on this site. Facts

😱

Originally posted by Nibedicus
There's actually one person who considers himself more qualified than anyone here:

😱

And somehow a neutron star's power< a sun.....Damnnn

Originally posted by h1a8
So it's true. You don't know what a conditional statement is.

Basically you are the idiot in this scenario.

CHARACTER:
"If it just rained then the grass got wet."

IDIOT :
"You are lying. How can you say that the grass is wet?"

Yes, because no one here understands what is implied by your statements when:

>He obviously didn't use your numbers.

>You state that he'd be lying (or wrong as per my statement) if he didn't use your numbers.

Yes, no one can definitely add 1 and 1 here. Definitely.

You understand you calling me an idiot is more a reflection of you, than me right? As you have been too afraid to accept any of my multiple BZ's.

Just pointing out that neutron stars can come in a variety of sizes.

https://www.space.com/22180-neutron-stars.html

Neutron stars pack their mass inside a 20-kilometer (12.4 miles) diameter

I've seen numbers ranging from 10 to 20 km

h1's complete and utter lack of self-awareness never ceases to amaze me.

Originally posted by Silent Master

I've seen numbers ranging from 10 to 20 km

Neutron stars are city size bodies... They are no where near the size of the sun, and yet a tea spoon size of it weights just as the Everest.

The mass of a neutron star is above the sun, and therefore it's power is obviously above too...

H1 lacks logic.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Just pointing out that neutron stars can come in a variety of sizes.

https://www.space.com/22180-neutron-stars.html

I've seen numbers ranging from 10 to 20 km

And their temperatures can range too and can be 600,000k.

But this does not destroy my point. His first link gave 10km as a source. That's evidence.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Yes, because no one here understands what is implied by your statements when:

>He obviously didn't use your numbers.

>You state that he'd be lying (or wrong as per my statement) if he didn't use your numbers.

Yes, no one can definitely add 1 and 1 here. Definitely.

You understand you calling me an idiot is more a reflection of you, than me right? As you have been too afraid to accept any of my multiple BZ's.

> My numbers? You see how you create a strawman. You are the deceitful one. You mean the numbers he provided? Prove it.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
And somehow a neutron star's power< a sun.....Damnnn

And it's funny how these two won't correct you here.
Basically someone else can state a false statement that is used against me but won't comment on it at all.
But if I say something they think is false then they are quick to pounce on it.

Originally posted by Silent Master
H1 has actually tried to imply that cutting a steel I-beam with heat vision was a comparable feat to Thor withstanding the full force of a neutron star

False. My post implied temperature of the Sun. The heat temperature from the hv would most certainly be less than the temperature of a neutron star but not by a super whole lot.
You left out cutting a steel I-beam "in half with a quick swipe". Taking an hour to melt that amount of steel vs a few seconds is a vast difference in temperature

Originally posted by Silent Master
He's trying to prove Kyle Hill made math errors, problem is he's making up numbers in order to prove it.

In other words, H1 is being massively dishonest.

This is a lie.
My claim is that he made an error using the numbers he provided. I did not make up the numbers he provided.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
OMG!! I just read a couple of pages....

Is H1 actually stating that a neutron's star energy is < the sun?????

The average neutron star's energy OUTPUT is less than the Sun after a few years. They are not as luminous as the Sun because their radii are vastly smaller and are constantly getting cooler.