Originally posted by carver9He did not use the stone against Hulk. Carver I know you didn’t grasp when he used the stones. It was pretty obvious since they would light up. He fought Hulk with his own strength and beat the shit out of him. Directors confirmed he’s stronger than the Hulk. 😂
I know this is off topic but I just watched the movie (I know I am late) and Thanos had the freaking gem on him when he beat the Hulk. This is why I dont visit this area of KMC... people troll here hard to make other characters look bad. Its freaking sad.
Originally posted by carver9We clearly see when he uses the stones and they don’t amp his durability, etc. like in the comics. We didn’t see him activate any stones during that fight and even against the other heroes we see him use it but any other feat is accomplished under his own reflexes/strength. Sorry but contest isn’t your friend. Thanos is stronger which I have always told you. He owned the Hulk decisively and quickly.
Him having the stone is major context. The showing is invalid and unusable.
Originally posted by Nibedicus
h1 has now completely down-low disavowed his "600k K" equation as "proof of YT video's math error" and moved the goalposts to the values of the source (who likely used a different sampling method via the words "typical" vs the YT video's word "average"😉 I provided. Practically admitting that the math he provided was at best false, at worst (and most likely) manipulated.h1 has already admitted that he cannot prove what the YT guy's numbers were and yet insists that the YT guy's numbers are those he wants them to be.
We all know that if h1 had not been exposed, he would have been (dishonest lying turd as he is) used this as facts and truths by default. Fortunately, that ended with this debate. Due to known propensity for deceit, h1's math can now be dismissed as false by default unless corroborated exactly by a credible source or credible poster (who is familiar with the science).
This debate is over and h1 is already exposed but he wants to carry it on to get the last word because he knows this will haunt him in future debates so he needs to get the last word so that in future debates he can go "I didn't manipulate the numbers, see I got the last word in!". Even though all he is doing now is just repeating the same flawed arguments over and over again.
I never lied. The definition of lying is to tell false statements ON PURPOSE in order to deceive. Lying is never just about telling false statements.I said he made a mistake AFTER calculating the power using 10km and 600,000k. Then I watched the video again after you posted the link and realized he most likely used 10^6k (because that what he posted in the video) instead of 600,000k (his link gives 600,000k as the temperature of a years old neutron star). After calculating with 10^6k to get the 0.186Lo result I still saw that he committed an error. So that’s why I didn’t reverse my statement about him making an error when I used 600,000k to show it. I should have posted immediately after that “even using 10^6k that his result is still off”. Instead, I allowed you to first post your source showing the calculation with 10^6. This made me look as if I was being deceitful. I swear, it looks bad but it isn’t. I’m one of the most honest people in the world. I gain nothing if I have to lie in a debate.
That’s like believing one character wins while lying that he doesn’t. That doesn’t make any sense as the belief itself defeats you.In other words, I didn’t pay attention to the 10^6k posted in the video. I just paid attention to the Formula and researched the values myself (I didn’t even know he linked to his sources at the time).
Now. To prove I’m not lying.
Here is my claim
Science Guy made a mistake. If you plug in the numbers he gave then you will not get his result. I can not find in his links numbers he used to get his result.
Therefore, I continue to stand by this claim.
If I’m lying then clearly prove me wrong. Show me how he didn’t make a mistake. Because if you can’t then you are the liar.
h1, why do you do this? Do you know how weasely, dishonest and pathetic you sound?
"Durrr! I didn't lie, I just made an honest mistake Durr!"
Just a few posts ago you were practically grovelling for us to believe you. No on believes you. Why do you think anyone would want to engage you using YOUR standards of proof (aka double standards) when you are more than willing to change narratives whenever it suits you?
You are a liar. Everyone knows you're liar. Now you're just ending up looking like a pathetic liar.
No one needs to believe you, no one needs to believe me. They can just go back a several pages and look how the discussion has went and see for themselves.
We know you are just trying to bury the posts. Just stop it, the debate is over and you have been exposed. IF you have any pride left you'd take a break and think about this experience with a little introspection and learn from it.
But we all know that you're just going to keep going, aren't you?
Originally posted by h1a8
Now. To prove I’m not lying.
Here is my claimScience Guy made a mistake. If you plug in the numbers he gave then you will not get his result. I can not find in his links numbers he used to get his result.
Therefore, I continue to stand by this claim.
If I’m lying then clearly prove me wrong. Show me how he didn’t make a mistake. Because if you can’t then you are the liar.
Provide the timestamp where Science guy gave the numbers for his equation.
Originally posted by Nibedicus
You are a liar. Everyone knows you're liar. Now you're just ending up looking like a pathetic liar.
Yeah, Comic Book Versus Forum knows him too well.
He even once claimed that Green Goblin started his career with actual superpowers... hell, he didn't even have his glider back then.
Originally posted by Silent Master
IOW, you can't back up your claim.That makes you a liar.
You are not the judge on how and if someone backed up their claim with evidence.
And you just proved that you are an idiot since you think someone not backing up their claim to your standards means they are lying. I think you need to look up the definition of lying.
Hint: one can say a false statement and it not be a lie.
Originally posted by h1a8
You are not the judge on how and if someone backed up their claim with evidence.And you just proved that you are an idiot since you think someone not backing up their claim to your standards means they are lying. I think you need to look up the definition of lying.
Hint: one can say a false statement and it not be a lie.
You're not backing up your claim because you know that you can't. thus you are knowingly stating something(your claim) that isn't true.
IOW, you're a liar.
Originally posted by Silent Master
You're not backing up your claim because you know that you can't. thus you are knowingly stating something(your claim) that isn't true.IOW, you're a liar.
1. Knowingly stating something that isn't true still isn't lying. It has to be with the purpose to deceive.
2. You don't know if I stated something untrue while believing it is untrue.