Originally posted by Nibedicus
BS. You think too highly of yourself (not surprised as you've always been arrogant) if you think ppl will be biased just because it's you.Enough stalling. Do you accept or not?
I'm not stalling (do you realize what that word means?).
I don't leave my fate in the hands of people I do not know.
Like I said, I don't gamble.
Originally posted by h1a8
I'm not stalling (do you realize what that word means?).
I don't leave my fate in the hands of people I do not know.Like I said, I don't gamble.
Lol. All talk no walk. That's what you are.
You won't even accept a BZ, making an excuse that people would be biased against you on something as non-subjective as MATH.
We all know you don't believe in your own math. Thus, everyone can just ignore your "math" and call you a liar every time you bring it up.
Til you accept my BZ, you're done here.
Originally posted by h1a8
I don't care personally. Anyone who has a problem with any of the calculations can just say it.
I'll keep an open mind.
Failure to point out which calculations are wrong implies that they must be correct and someone is butthurt.
You mean refusal for someone to play your dishonest game of constantly shifting goalposts without a medium for resolving it is butthurt? Sure whatever you say, sport.
🙄
I'm more than willing to point out where I find your calculations are wrong once you accept the BZ. Why won't you accept? It's math, you're either wrong or you're not. You seem pretty sure of yourself. What are you afraid of? 6 months is nothing, I'm sure you have a life outside KMC (as do I), should be nothing for a kung fu master scientist teacher like you.
I'm certainly not wasting my time arguing with you for 20 pages about where you're wrong only for you to again shift to another goalpost, sorry but I'm not stupid, and I won't waste any more of my time with dishonest weasels.
Originally posted by h1a8Peoole destroys you in every thread. You are a wimp. No balls. You know you’re full of shit and don’t even have the balls to accept the challenge. You’re weak, kid. You’ve always been weak. Get lost.
I don't care personally. Anyone who has a problem with any of the calculations can just say it.
I'll keep an open mind.
Failure to point out which calculations are wrong implies that they must be correct and someone is butthurt.
Originally posted by Nibedicus
You mean refusal for someone to play your dishonest game of constantly shifting goalposts without a medium for resolving it is butthurt? Sure whatever you say, sport.🙄
I'm more than willing to point out where I find your calculations are wrong once you accept the BZ. Why won't you accept? It's math, you're either wrong or you're not. You seem pretty sure of yourself. What are you afraid of? 6 months is nothing, I'm sure you have a life outside KMC (as do I), should be nothing for a kung fu master scientist teacher like you.
I'm certainly not wasting my time arguing with you for 20 pages about where you're wrong only for you to again shift to another goalpost, sorry but I'm not stupid, and I won't waste any more of my time with dishonest weasels.
You pointed out that the distance of 15-20m is wrong. It is more like 8m.
What did I do afterwards? I gave timestamps to the scene where I made the estimate. I even said that we can accept the 8m distance. It would reduce the total average force for the feat though.
Nowhere did I shift goalposts. You pointed out the problem, I gave you the scene where I got it from and I even said I'll accept your estimate instead.
You are just making shit up at this point.
Originally posted by h1a8
You pointed out that the distance of 15-20m is wrong. It is more like 8m.
What did I do afterwards? I gave timestamps to the scene where I made the estimate. I even said that we can accept the 8m distance. It would reduce the total average force for the feat though.Nowhere did I shift goalposts. You pointed out the problem, I gave you the scene where I got it from and I even said I'll accept your estimate instead.
You are just making shit up at this point.
Wasn’t talking about that instance, I’m talking about your behavior much earlier.
How about a bet, I post the definition of shifting goalposts, then I point out where you did it in our debate this week. If I do so, we let a mod decide if it is correct, if he agrees with me, you leave for a month? Fair?
As for that argument, I refuse to engage you further because I’m saving my arguments for the BZ.
Originally posted by NibedicusWasn’t talking about that instance, I’m talking about your behavior much earlier.
How about a bet, I post the definition of shifting goalposts, then I point out where you did it in our debate this week. If I do so, we let a mod decide if it is correct, if he agrees with me, you leave for a month? Fair?
As for that argument, I refuse to engage you further because I’m saving my arguments for the BZ
What behavior earlier? Point it out.
I gave you a good explanation of the situation. You ignored it. I swear to you there was no dishonesty at all intented.
Apparently there are two valid ways to calculate acceleration.
I chose time and velocity (our velocity estimates were close to each other's)
Josh chose velocity and distance.
I found out that would make the time be WAY OFF. So much that it becomes hilarious (as we clearly see the time is approximately 10s).
Josh told us time was a lie and PIS. You knew that was full of shit (as we need time to calculate the speed) and yet you said nothing to him about that.
So I thought about it.
We can't argue against time and we can't argue against distance since those two are shown explicitly and can't be argued against. But we don't see the actual speed before the punch and therefore it is more of a speculation. So the speed before impact must be wrong. Otherwise, the 3 quantities would just contradict each other in the equations.
Now if you have any suggestions then I'm all ears. But please be objective and fair. I'll do the same.
I do have a suggestion.
In the BZ. Do you accept?
You might think I’m being especially and unecessarily mean to you h1 (where I am corteous to most everyone else), but I find your style of dishonest debating extremely disgusting. And while you sound reasonable in this one single post, I have no doubt that you would resort to more dishonest BS again the second you are no longer being scrutinized.
I find it especially wasteful that you have a geniune interest in physics but you frequently tarnish everything you say with such absurd level of bias that it is practically unpalatable to most anyone reading (except for the biased few).
Do you do this to troll? Are you genuinely mentally impaired in some way? Idunno. I’m hoping the former since I’d feel terrible if it was the latter.
Superman would be sent flying and be feeling it. He might even be temp KO like against Non. He wouldn't be damaged and would get back into the fight unharmed. Superman is impossible to put down long-term, and it's easier to stun him than to make him bleed confusingly.
I don't think any other response is consistent with what we saw in MoS, BvsS and even JL. He felt Wonder Woman's head Butt, Cyborg's canon and was stunned by the Motherbox separation. Those were the only 3 attacks he took, Hulk is all of them to the third power imo. Which again is consistent with MoS, it's easier to stun him and knock him down with sufficient force, than to make him bleed.