Originally posted by -Pr-
You say that like low showings matter. They don't.
Also, the original argument was that Jane Thor doesn't struggle with moon level mass.
I then showed three examples of her struggling with far less.
Baz's response? To show a single showing of Jane with a supernova. And that, therefore, was her average.
And therefore, her multiple showings of her struggling with MUCH less, were non applicable.....
Very hypocritical.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Where did it say this? I've read JLA/Avengers many times. Never seen that.
JLA/Avengers collector's edition has it.
Busiek's plot reveals that Thor combined with several other avengers couldn't beat Superman in raw power and Superman adds his own power to mjolnir to destroy Krona's barrier which Thor couldn't.
Also Superman/Fantastic Four.
Apples and oranges. Very different dynamics in the two Universes (Mutants, and Marvels propensity for new characters and DC's legacy mentality makes a big difference).
Don't play dumb. Most Thor/Avengers comics don't even acknowledge mutants.
Ironically Kurt Busiek was probably the last writer who stated Thor was the most powerful avenger ever.
That's not true...? A few writers would have Thor > Superman, so saying that NO COMIC would do so is preposterous. Even JLA indirectly implied it when Superman lifted Mjolnir. Regardless, you're spouting a lot of assumptions as fact. Maybe you're just having a tease, I at least hope you haven't been drinking your koolaid.
Superman tends to be the most powerful hero in almost any setting, Thor doesn't. That's more Hulk's role.
JLA/Avengers had Superman add his power to mjolnir to break Krona's barrier.
Lol what are you even saying? Do you even remember the original post you replied to? If you think that, then why would it be Thor with just his strength and durability vs full powers Superman or even Superman strength and durability.If you think that, why are you so afraid to have Thor at full power if the strength and durability is a foregone conclusion iyo? You're inconsistent af.
Are you having a stroke? What is this gibberish? Superman with just strength and durability>Thor with just strength and durability. Just like Superman>Thor in general.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
DS why do you continue to bother?How have I never seen this scan before?
FFS, Jane struggled with a ****ing vending machine where she was handling Mangog five issues later.
Originally posted by Baziemarc123
where?
Originally posted by abhilegend
JLA/Avengers collector's edition has it.Busiek's plot reveals that Thor combined with several other avengers couldn't beat Superman in raw power and Superman adds his own power to mjolnir to destroy Krona's barrier which Thor couldn't.
Thor and several avengers combined were less than Superman in raw power. Explicitly stated.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Thor and several avengers combined were less than Superman in raw power. Explicitly stated.
ROFL yet he was beaten down by 4 low tiers (She Hulk), Vision, Iron Man in his 1st armor, and Wonder Woman
Originally posted by Baziemarc123
ROFL yet he was beaten down by 4 low tiers (She Hulk), Vision, Iron Man in his 1st armor, and Wonder Woman
That's not Wonder Woman....
Originally posted by Baziemarc123
ROFL yet he was beaten down by 4 low tiers (She Hulk), Vision, Iron Man in his 1st armor, and Wonder Woman
Not by raw power as Busiek stated.
I like how Hercules is a low tier and Simon is now wonder woman.
