Originally posted by CosmicComet
Herc admitted Jane was tougher at arm wrestling than Thor was, this is despite his arms being much longer than hers (better leverage).
He is totally reliable when it comes to Thor, so must be true.
I mean considering she failed to demonstrate any physical advantage against Thor when they fought under the same writer
Originally posted by Baziemarc123
I mean considering she failed to demonstrate any physical advantage against Thor when they fought under the same writer
Originally posted by Baziemarc123
hercules is notorious for being a dick to get under people’s skin. You'd KNOW this, if you read his appearances
since current Superman was struggling with a DAMN elephant which is embarassing , let's see Thor doing something far more impressive lmao. I still to this day don't understand why there's even a debate between them. Thor's in a way entirely different class
Casually with carries the largest mountain in jotunheim
This is jotunheim
Originally posted by abhilegend
Writers are shown wrong about the very comics they write?News for me.
'So' what the writer wrote is not what actually happened in the comic. The writer's outline of what he plans to write is not necessarily what hits the page.
And yes, the writer can be wrong, sometimes. It does happen. Writers make mistakes. Writers say things that don't actually match with what happened on page. So really? One needs to decide whether or not you believe the WRITER, or you believe what is on the page with regards to feats.
Basically, do you believe Word of God, or do you believe what actually hits the page?
To muddy the waters further, what you are quoting there seems to be an outline for the story, BEFORE the story was written in detail. Well, things change. Look at what happens with Clark using the Hammer. THOR doesn't try to break the shield, and then Clark grabs the Hammer on the Rebound. That was what you have red-squared in the outline, but nope, that doesn't happen in the actual comics. Thor just throws Mjolnir to Superman, who then uses it to break the shield.
So, do I believe the writer or what was shown? I guess I could believe the writer, but in the actual story? What the writer says in his outline DOESN'T HAPPEN.
PERIOD.
Originally posted by Baziemarc123
'So' what the writer wrote is not what actually happened in the comic. The writer's outline of what he plans to write is not necessarily what hits the page.And yes, the writer can be wrong, sometimes. It does happen. Writers make mistakes. Writers say things that don't actually match with what happened on page. So really? One needs to decide whether or not you believe the WRITER, or you believe what is on the page with regards to feats.
Basically, do you believe Word of God, or do you believe what actually hits the page?
To muddy the waters further, what you are quoting there seems to be an outline for the story, BEFORE the story was written in detail. Well, things change. Look at what happens with Clark using the Hammer. THOR doesn't try to break the shield, and then Clark grabs the Hammer on the Rebound. That was what you have red-squared in the outline, but nope, that doesn't happen in the actual comics. Thor just throws Mjolnir to Superman, who then uses it to break the shield.
So, do I believe the writer or what was shown? I guess I could believe the writer, but in the actual story? What the writer says in his outline DOESN'T HAPPEN.
PERIOD.
I think that Byrne means that they outnumbered Superman, they didn't overpower him.
Originally posted by Baziemarc123
So?
Originally posted by Baziemarc123
Thor can aswell hold back while trying to kill. I mean he's known for this
Originally posted by Baziemarc123
since current Superman was struggling with a DAMN elephant which is embarassing , let's see Thor doing something far more impressive lmao. I still to this day don't understand why there's even a debate between them. Thor's in a way entirely different classCasually with carries the largest mountain in jotunheim
This is jotunheim
But since you are asking for lifting feats, here is weakest Superman since crisis, lifting a living mountain able to crush metropolis.
http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx28/PhilosophiaKMC/SupermanMountain1.jpg
http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx28/PhilosophiaKMC/SupermanMountain2.jpg
http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx28/PhilosophiaKMC/SupermanMountain3.jpg
http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx28/PhilosophiaKMC/SupermanMountain4.jpg
Lulz at lowballing though. I mean "current" Thor isn't strong enough to break titanium level ropes.
Originally posted by Baziemarc123
'So' what the writer wrote is not what actually happened in the comic. The writer's outline of what he plans to write is not necessarily what hits the page.And yes, the writer can be wrong, sometimes. It does happen. Writers make mistakes. Writers say things that don't actually match with what happened on page. So really? One needs to decide whether or not you believe the WRITER, or you believe what is on the page with regards to feats.
Basically, do you believe Word of God, or do you believe what actually hits the page?
To muddy the waters further, what you are quoting there seems to be an outline for the story, BEFORE the story was written in detail. Well, things change. Look at what happens with Clark using the Hammer. THOR doesn't try to break the shield, and then Clark grabs the Hammer on the Rebound. That was what you have red-squared in the outline, but nope, that doesn't happen in the actual comics. Thor just throws Mjolnir to Superman, who then uses it to break the shield.
So, do I believe the writer or what was shown? I guess I could believe the writer, but in the actual story? What the writer says in his outline DOESN'T HAPPEN.
PERIOD.
Wanna cry?
