WWHulk Vs WW3 Black Adam

Originally posted by -Pr-
I won't warn you; I'm just getting tired of this fake "i could own you any time i want" bullshit; makes me wish I wasn't a mod sometimes.

You've made statements without backing them up, and then when you get called on them, you either change the subject or just ignore them entirely.

I don't say this to be mean, but: Man the f*ck up. It's just comics. If you're wrong, then you're wrong, but at least have the guts to admit it.

Honestly, it's just tired at this point.

I genuinely don't want to sound mean or like I'm making a personal attack here; I don't know you in person, this is just a forum. You are just not conducting yourself very well, and it's gotten to the point where people say "Oh, That Carver", the way they say "oh, that Quagmire". It's become a form of parody that just glosses over the real issue.

Lol. Nearly 7 years ago!

And that post is still in my mind. Pr ticked on me. Went straight berserk. Hes still my buddy and even though he said we dont know each other personally, I feel like I know the guy.

Originally posted by -Pr-
We had this exact discussion years ago, and I showed you the scans that proved that the poxy arrows were not normal arrows.

For shame, Carter. For shame.

We did?. I dont remember.

Lol I literally quoted a post from that exchange.....

Originally posted by carver9
We did?. I dont remember.

Awful convenient.

He remembers specific posts from that convo though, lol. If you click through, you'll see that the post I quote at the top of the page is .....from a debate about Celestial Archer and his arrows, and Black Adam.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85

Ok. So IYO, BA, witht the power of six/seven gods, whilst running riot through DC, when throwing lethal punches, out for the kill, can only crack the ribs of a human?

I mean, that's what this is all about. If that is truly your opinion, then ok. You can hide behind the excuse 'thats what the comic shows!' if you want, but deep down....if it's PIS, then we can disregard it. If however you truly think a rampaging guy who is one of the top dogs in strength in DC is....human level, then OK.

This was your sentence, that I had issues with:

Not playing games. Am genuinely curious. Is that the level you're seeing a rampaging BA at? You double down in the post I am replying to, by saying Gardner has no shielding that you can see.

So are you genuinely of the belief that BA can only crack human ribs when he's out for the kill?

Or are you using PIS as proof? Your logic is like me saying Hulk isn't strong because he can't even split his pants...... [/B]

I'm at work so I'll need to catch up with this a bit later. All that I have to say at the moment is that you do the same thing that seems to have made you disgusted. You want to hand cuff the Hulk, and then make it seem as if the Thing or any of those heroes on Earth were truly a challenge, while skating around the context of the character.

Originally posted by Stoic
I'm at work so I'll need to catch up with this a bit later. All that I have to say at the moment is that you do the same thing that seems to have made you disgusted. You want to hand cuff the Hulk, and then make it seem as if the Thing or any of those heroes on Earth were truly a challenge, while skating around the context of the character.

My first post in here was in reply to you and your post.

I was deliberately doing what you were doing....so yes, I would hope it would be the same lol.

Context around the character is that no matter who the Hulk fights or is a bystander, he does not kill. And does not fully cut loose.

And never has. Not until Heart of the Monster, where he cuts loose once he realises there are no permanent implications (i.e everyone can be resurrected).

IOW, in character, the Hulk always holds back. You're basically applying very specific storyline arguments to all forum fights, which is ...wrong. IMO.

An analogy is with Batman. He doesn't use guns....unless he really has to, in order to save the world (against Darkseid, in Final Crisis).

So does that mean in every forum fight, if the OP stipulates Batman is fighting to win..... he'll use guns?

Think back to my analogy for Sin. Sure, you're mad at your kid for covering your brand new TV in paint. The maddest you've ever been with them.

Doesn't mean you're one shotting them. You still hold back. I'm not 'cuffing' the Hulk, I'm using the forum rules of CIS. As part of his nature, the Hulk always holds back. Gamma maths.

Until he doesn't have to, specifically because he knows the person he's atomising will come back to life.

Let me look back and see what happened because Dark does enjoy lowballing Hulk qnd mentioning the Thing showing like Hulk would literally try to kill Thing. Let's see.

Lol I didn't even mention him here......

Edit:. FFS Carver, lol. I'm not bringing any low showings in this thread. STOIC brought low showings in. All I did was say we shouldn't use low showings.

I never once brought Thing in here, lol.

Dark didnt start this one with the low balling. I see where it started.

Carver, moments ago:

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Lol I didn't even mention him here......

Edit:. FFS Carver, lol. I'm not bringing any low showings in this thread. STOIC brought low showings in. All I did was say we shouldn't use low showings.

I never once brought Thing in here, lol.

And I'm saying no problem, I figured that by proxy the Green Scar gets the low ball treatment, which is exactly why people use WW Hulk instead of Green Scar, because they know that he's hand cuffed to react as if he were stuck in plot mode. No one will acknowledge the fact that WW Hulk could in fact do everything that he did in the Dark Dimension.

This is why people place him up against guys that should never be a challenge to him in a neutral setting. Guys like Black Adam.

Originally posted by Stoic
And I'm saying no problem, I figured that by proxy the Green Scar gets the low ball treatment, which is exactly why people use WW Hulk instead of Green Scar, because they know that he's hand cuffed to react as if he were stuck in plot mode. No one will acknowledge the fact that WW Hulk could in fact do everything that he did in the Dark Dimension.

This is why people place him up against guys that should never be a challenge to him in a neutral setting. Guys like Black Adam.

Then Batman goes into every match, and shoots his grappling gun through his opponents, or Cap starts a match by throwing his shield and decapitating his opponents.

Can they do it? Sure.

But they don't. Because they don't go all-out.

They still fight in character. Hulk only went all out in the Dark Dimension because he knew if he did, everyone would be magically wished back to life. No harm, no foul. He didn't do it before, and he doesn't do it again. Is it because he physically can't? One can argue that as the Hulk, where his powers are dependent on his character, he can't do it because he stops himself.

Putting them in a forum battle doesn't suddenly mean that Batman suddenly uses the 5 point palm exploding heart technique on everyone. Nor does it mean Strange is suddenly turning everyone inside out. Or Firestorm is turning people into salt (heh).

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Same way when one's kid has decided to help paint the room, by covering your entire, new, 60 inch LED screen with paint.

Are you mad? Sure. MAddest you've ever been with them. But you're not backhanding them across the room.

Naw. Because if i was truly the angriest ive ever been i would've killee them.

So the angriest you've ever been, you've killed?

Edit: and I don't mean under sanctioned means (law enforcement, armed forces etc). You've actually taken a life and was angry enough to not care about the law.

Good point Saint.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
So the angriest you've ever been, you've killed?

Edit: and I don't mean under sanctioned means (law enforcement, armed forces etc). You've actually taken a life and was angry enough to not care about the law.

I haven't killed no but i have hit someone or attacked someone with the intent to kill at my angriest. Just because i didnt kill doesnt mean i couldn't kill. In Hulks case and he's at his angriest then there is no room for rational thought. It's simply destroy. If in the back of his mind he's still holding back or formulating ways not to kill he's either not truly angry or just playing a part imho

Originally posted by Sin I AM
i have hit someone or attacked someone with the intent to kill at my angriest

What did he/she do?

They were being a very naughty gimp, most likely.