Originally posted by Surtur
You can have issues with my original comment, but I have further elaborated on what I am talking about. Yes, this does bother me, I do see it as bad. And I'm afraid of it just being a single drop in the ocean of outrage that surrounds this man.
No, you didn't "elaborate." You said the MSNBC lady's comparison "overshadowed legit gripes" people might have about...
Oh no...
NOT AGAIN...
... One of the most powerful developed nations on Earth feeding disinformation to the public through a GOVERNMENT website?
So, no, it didn't overshadow a goddamn thing and it's not even relevant anyway and I don't care if you see it as bad because you went off about some MSNBC contributor's comparison and just said, "Yeah, this is bad too." You're playing down what Trump has done here.
Anyway, Wine-Banks was discussing when Trump sided with Putin about Russian election interference, which happened. Then, she said she felt it would live in infamy with other enormous historical events. Is it because she was on MSNBC and Maddow was discussing the White House website shit on MSNBC? Is that, like, the connection you did there?
So, comments about a Pearl Harbor comparison overshadows Trump agreeing that there wasn't election interference by Russia with the guy who was BEHIND it and Trump's administration purposely putting blatant disinformation on their website? The WHOLE point is that this is NOT hysteria. It's not an overreaction. It's a justified reaction to more tremendously awful shit.
You're trying to distract from that and it's an indirect way of saying, "This is worse." Do you know what "overshadow" means? Christ almighty. Why are you like this?