Originally posted by Silent Master
Everyone can clearly see that you lied when you told Darth that you were responding to me and not him. You're just making yourself look even worse at this point.By the way, I never said paintballs were greater than bullets so that's another lie you just told.
Darth mentioned something about me claiming something about paintballs.
I told him that (the claim about paintballs) was in response to you.
Now do you understand?
Originally posted by h1a8
Darth mentioned something about me claiming something about paintballs.
I told him that (the claim about paintballs) was in response to you.Now do you understand?
BS, Darth didn't mention paintballs until here.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Movie logic? Yeah great point!Yes the bullets must have missed, and the near misses may have caused holes in his armour. Again great point 👆
Yes Thors durability being > Iron Mans is a silly point to bring up. I apologise for my childness. But wait? Didnt you just logically claim a bullet > paintballs? Was that not changing goal posts? No wait, your the science and maths teacher, so Im sure you know best.
Your next post is this
Originally posted by h1a8
I was responding to Silent. Hes trolling about the paintballs.
"I was responding to Silent" meaning the post Darth quoted was in response to me. sed post was
Originally posted by h1a8
Movie logic. There were holes in him though. maybe the bullets missed?
Thor's durability being greater is irrelevant (moving the goalposts).
Yet no proof that aircraft bullets will bounce off him.
That was a response to Darth, not me. which means, you lied. you also lied when you said "EVERYONE PLEASE READ THE EXCHANGE OF BETWEEN ME, SILENT AND DARTH. START WITH THE POST WHERE SILENT TROLLS ABOUT PAINTBALLS >>>BULLETS." as I never said paintballs >>>> bullets.
IOW, h1 is a confirmed liar.
Originally posted by Silent Master
BS, Darth didn't mention paintballs until here.Your next post is this
"I was responding to Silent" meaning the post Darth quoted was in response to me. sed post was
That was a response to Darth, not me. which means, you lied. you also lied when you said "EVERYONE PLEASE READ THE EXCHANGE OF BETWEEN ME, SILENT AND DARTH. START WITH THE POST WHERE SILENT TROLLS ABOUT PAINTBALLS >>>BULLETS." as I never said paintballs >>>> bullets.
IOW, h1 is a confirmed liar.
NO! Darth commented on my statement about paintballs. That statement was a reply to your post (you were the first to mention paintballs). He basically commented on my response to something you said.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Someone said Lightning would be enough to bring down jets... Planes get hit by lightning often they don't go down. Cars get hit by lighting they don't stop and the people inside are safe. Ummm, look up Faraday cage.
I'm assuming you forgot about the scene in Avengers 1 where Thor is taking out alien ships with his lightning?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QcT2yCOYxU
4:39 mark. Thor's lightning really is different from regular lightning.
Originally posted by emporerpants
I'm assuming you forgot about the scene in Avengers 1 where Thor is taking out alien ships with his lightning?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QcT2yCOYxU
4:39 mark. Thor's lightning really is different from regular lightning.
Why is it different? Regular lightning is very powerful (10 billion watts).
A typical lightning bolt lasts for about 30 microseconds (0.00003 seconds) and has 10 billion watts of power.
Thor absorbed more than 10 seconds of lightning energy. That's over 300,000 times more energy than a typical lightning bolt. But Thor transfered the same amount of energy at nearly the same rate he absorbed it. Therefore the power output of the lightning should be nearly identical as the rate in which Thor absorbed it (10 billion watts).
In conclusion, Thor's lightning delivers more energy (lasts longer) but has the same power output as regular lightning.
Originally posted by h1a8
Why is it different? Regular lightning is very powerful (10 billion watts).A typical lightning bolt lasts for about 30 microseconds (0.00003 seconds) and has 10 billion watts of power.
Thor absorbed more than 10 seconds of lightning energy. That's over 300,000 times more energy than a typical lightning bolt. But Thor transfered the same amount of energy at nearly the same rate he absorbed it. Therefore the power output of the lightning should be nearly identical as the rate in which Thor absorbed it (10 billion watts).
In conclusion, Thor's lightning delivers more energy (lasts longer) but has the same power output as regular lightning.
I'd like to see regular lightning smash acres of solid ice like Thor's lightning did in Jotunheim.
Originally posted by FrothByte
I'd like to see regular lightning smash acres of solid ice like Thor's lightning did in Jotunheim.
Please learn reading comprehension. Again little one, a regular lightning bolt only lasts 0.00003 of a second. If the regular bolt last about the same time as Thor's lightning then it could potentially do far more damage than Thor's lightning.
3 seconds of lightning > 100,000 lightning bolts in total energy.
Thor's power output is equal or less than regular lightning, it's just has way more energy (because it lasts longer).