Who would be a bigger threat: Thor vs. Superman

@h1, multiple times in these threads, it was already pointed out that an Asgardian farmer casually crumpled a tactical knife in his hand without injury. That's proof that a human knife was unable to cut Asgardian skin.

Originally posted by Robtard
@ H1

That means: "Today I Learned"

No, I don't have to prove that Asgardians are durable enough to withstand a regular human man knife, logic dictates that they are as we've seen then handle greater.

Also of note and you've been told this before, an Asgardian nigh-midget scrub casually crumbled a tactical knife in his hand without a single scratch.

The Frost Giant ice-weapons do have feats, they're strong enough to damage Asgardian armor and skin 🙂

Any other ridiculous low-ballings?

What’s greater than resisting being stabbed by a knife?
Let’s see if you know any science.

The asgardian didn’t crumble a knife. It’s funny how you used the same false wording as the other poster. The asgardian bent the knife along its flat edge. At best, he resisted being cut somewhat. But you and I should know that being stabbed >>>>>>being cut along the edge of a blade.

Damaging Asgardian skin is a circular argument. We are debating their durability against getting cut, not assuming it to prove it.

No one is low balling. Aircraft bullets can penetrate thick solid steel like tissue paper. They have put holes in IM armor. I’m not going to accept such bullets bouncing off Thor without good evidence.

Originally posted by Silent Master
If you want to claim it was somethin other than the daggers Loki has been shown to use on multiple occasions across several movies. Prove it, show examples from the movies where Loki is shown to posses energy weapons.

@h1, in other words, you have zero proof that human-made weapons can actually injure Thor.

That's like saying that a cave man made spear with a bone spearhead can pierce Superman because DD killed him with a bone spear.

Originally posted by h1a8
When we see the actual dagger in other movies, they don’t glow. Therefore it’s possible those were energy objects. If you believe they were magical metal daggers then clearly post a still shot showing it. Otherwise we don’t know and you are just guessing..

In order for them to possibly be energy objects, energy objects would have to exist in the MCU and Loki would need to have access to them.

So, prove your claim.

Originally posted by Inhuman
That's like saying that a cave man made spear with a bone spearhead can pierce Superman because DD killed him with a bone spear.

That’s not saying that at all. Not even close to the same thing.
I noticed that you have a superhuman logo but are incredibly bias towards Thor and Marvel. Why?

Originally posted by FrothByte
@h1, in other words, you have zero proof that human-made weapons can actually injure Thor.

They way debating goes, you can’t prove a negative.
Thor, without feats, doesn’t get abilities.
That means he’s not stab proof unless you can provide feats to show it.

@ H1 your arguments are foolishly clownish and yes, you resort to low-balling and nonsense tactics as a means to debate-troll. eg You comparing a bullet proof vest as being comparable to Thor.

ps The F-22 20mm cannon only did superficial damage to the Mark III armor, as did an A1M1 Abrams tank shelling. Yes, Thor is far more durable than the Mark III armor as fact, as we've seen him take greater. Do your thing now.

@h1 - first of all fix your damn posts so we can quote you.

Second, of that's your reasoning then Superman isn't stabproof either.

Originally posted by Silent Master
In order for them to possibly be energy objects, energy objects would have to exist in the MCU and Loki would need to have access to them.

So, prove your claim.

Energy objects do exist is the MCU. Dr Strange can conjure them like nothing. MCU is a fictional universe. Many things are possible under the suspension of disbelief.
It’s not against the suspension of disbelief or an impossibility that Loki doesn’t have access to energy objects. He has access to magic after all.

Dr Strange uses magic, so that would by magical objects and not energy objects. nor did you show proof that Loki could conjure magical projectiles.

Try again.

Originally posted by FrothByte
@h1 - first of all fix your damn posts so we can quote you.

Second, of that's your reasoning then Superman isn't stabproof either.

He is purposely using the wrong apostrophe so we can't quote, it's one of his more subtle forms of trolling.

Originally posted by Robtard
@ H1 your arguments are foolishly clownish and yes, you resort to low-balling and nonsense tactics as a means to debate-troll. eg You comparing a bullet proof vest as being comparable to Thor.

ps The F-22 20mm cannon only did superficial damage to the Mark III armor, as did an A1M1 Abrams tank shelling. Yes, Thor is far more durable than the Mark III armor as fact, as we've seen him take greater. Do your thing now.

Wrong! Stop being stupid and creating strawmen. I’m not comparing a bulletproof vest to Thor. I used an example to show the faultiness of your argument. Your argument was, Thor can withstand being stabbed by a knife because he is bulletproof. It’s faulty. Deal with it.

If you want to give evidence that Thor can withstand aircraft bullets then give feats supporting it. Stop giving faulty and circular arguments. It’s makes you appear stupid, and I don’t want to believe that.

You can’t even begin to say I’m lowballing if you then at least give evidence supporting it.

And characters don’t share feats. Characters have inconsistent high and low showings. Using a character’s highest showing as a basis for another is faulty.
That’s like saying Supergirl casually lifted a half million tons so that anyone who overpowers her or can physically go toe to toe with her can lift a half million tons too. Or that Colossus, Thing, etc can tank planet destroying punches because they yanked Gladiators punches.

Originally posted by FrothByte
@h1 - first of all fix your damn posts so we can quote you.

Second, of that's your reasoning then Superman isn't stabproof either.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Dr Strange uses magic, so that would by magical objects and not energy objects. nor did you show proof that Loki could conjure magical projectiles.

Try again.

I dont have to prove a possibility.
Its possible he can. If I show it, then its more than a possibility, it’s a fact.

Originally posted by h1a8
How do I fix it?

You've been told before, stop using the crappy apostrophe.

h1 couldn't prove his claim, thus it will be ignored. Loki's daggers are thus confirmed as magical.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You've been told before, stop using the crappy apostrophe.

You just used it here though in this post.

Originally posted by h1a8
You just used it here though in this post.

No, I used a normal apostrophe, take a good like at mine ' and compare it to the one you're using.

Its possible for Cap to be able to use magic.
Its possible for Loki to have access to magical energy objects.

I can go on and on. Only an idiot would think you have to prove such things in a fictional universe.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No, I used a normal apostrophe, take a good like at mine ' and compare it to the one you're using.

Its the keyboard on my phone then. Im using iPhone keyboard with word prediction.. I'll long press on it to change it.